Is Obama behind Cains trouble?

[Leatherneck 693]

Also confident that the Obama the Socialist crowd keeps touting Romney.

Yeah, it's normal for them to attempt to pick the conservative candidate they'd like to smash.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I know exactly who is behind Herman Cain's trouble. Herman Cain himself. He could have simply conducted himself decently throughout his career and there would be no touble out there whatsoever. He chose not to do that and behave live an old pervert instead. It's time to show a display of some personal responsibility for Mr. Cain. He is sure fast to demand it from others.

This will soon become the GOP's slogan: Personal responsibility for thee but not for me.

Edited November 14, 2011 by Mr. Big Dog

[Leatherneck 693]

Interesting none of this came up before Cain was leading in the polls.

Guess it's okay with the accusers for Cain to be a pervert, just not a pervert leading in the polls.

[^_^ 5,021]

Interesting none of this came up before Cain was leading in the polls.

Guess it's okay with the accusers for Cain to be a pervert, just not a pervert leading in the polls.

That's how it works. If you're competing with a bunch of people for a job, you don't go after the lowly intern with delusions of grandeur... you go after the guy (or woman) who has an actual shot.

Real life is hard but do try to keep up.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Interesting none of this came up before Cain was leading in the polls.

That's how it always goes. As a candidate rises in the polls the candidate gets put under the microscope. There's no mystery here at all.

[luckytxn 2,264]

Interesting none of this came up before Cain was leading in the polls.

Guess it's okay with the accusers for Cain to be a pervert, just not a pervert leading in the polls.

When I saw the lady in question with Atty. Allred I knew at that time it was a hit.

I also laughed because I remember when Obama the Socialist was making his first splash a guy came out that said how he used to do coke and give BJ's to him but the press buried that story. The anointed one could do no wrong back then.

[luckytxn 2,264]

http://www.amazon.co...e/dp/0578013878

Google Larry Sinclair.

Edited November 14, 2011 by luckytxn

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

I'm sure Alexrod used that same time machine to go back to 1997 to file the original complaints that he used to travel to 1961 to put Obama's birth announcement in the Honolulu newspaper

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I'm sure Alexrod used that same time machine to go back to 1997 to file the original complaints that he used to travel to 1961 to put Obama's birth announcement in the Honolulu newspaper

That's right. I'm sure Axelrod is also responsible for Perry fcuking up in the debates. And for all of Newt's indiscretions. It's not like they could in any way be responsible for their own issues. They're Republicans and Republicans do not take responsibility. Ever.

[luckytxn 2,264]

Very sordid.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/mom-of-murdered-obama-gay-lover-speaks-up/

[TBoneTX 45,156]

I'd like to hear someone refute the following reasoning, si man:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=367569

Monday, November 14, 2011

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cain's profile: Neither Casanova nor rapist

Exclusive: Dr. Gina Loudon, Dr. Dathan Paterno analyze case against GOP candidate

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: November 13, 2011

5:30 pm Eastern

We all read fables as children. While we learn morals, we also are inadvertently conditioned to readily believe the unlikely and even the impossible.

Such is the case made against Herman Cain by Sharon Bialek, whose accusations read more like a fable than historical fact.

One would think that in this evidence heavy culture, physical evidence would be necessary to convince a discerning public of a political candidate's predatory nature. Bill Clinton's scandal provided a stained dress; Anthony Weiner broadcast his scandalous behavior online. In the case of Herman Cain, we have nothing, except a woman's report of an egregious act. It would be wise to examine her contentions.

There are two psychological profiles to consider when we look at the behavior pattern of a sexual predator. The first is the Casanova – the man who fancies himself irresistibly desirable. He can lure women with expensive hotel rooms, suave demeanor and, ultimately, his sexual prowess. The Casanova revels in the chase, the innuendo and the pursuit. He lures, flatters and elicits. He utilizes a wide array of well-rehearsed pick up lines. While he exerts power in compartmentalized ways, he unconsciously questions his own personal power. He compensates by controlling and conquering.

He is overdressed, self-doubting and compensatory, as his inadequacy is intolerable. Deep down, he loathes himself for using sex to try to cover his insecurities. He uses women to mask his failures in life, but his failure to secure a deeper and permanent intimacy necessitates an unending supply of superficial conquests. Here, despair manifests in his showmanship, and his ever-frantic effort to prove himself worthy in some pseudo-masculine arena. Ultimately, sex becomes a means of conquering, no matter how low he has to take his standards to achieve his ego strokes, sometimes resorting to prostitution, serial marriage and other problems.

The second profile matches the rapist, the bona fide sexual offender. The rapist can stem from the latter personality, becoming ever more desperate and demented. The rapist has a different approach to sex, but a consistent one – he refuses to take "no" for an answer. His insecurity about his masculinity and lack of control in most parts of his life are so pervasive that his ego cannot tolerate rejection, or he would risk admitting that he has no control, no personal worth and no power. The rapist comes on bold, fast, with no foreplay, no tenderness, no invitation. He can allow no room for rejection. His is not a game, but an act of war. There is no victory, only conquering.

These profiles both reflect deep unhealthiness, but they are quite distinct. The Casanova might ultimately resort to violent offence or the rapist role, but the reverse never occurs. The accusations against Herman Cain defy common sense in light of these personality profiles. Ms. Bialek asserts that Mr. Cain shoved her head in his lap in a car – an act of aggression – then asserts that he took "no" for an answer – a decidedly non-aggressive choice. Either contention would be believable exclusively, but they simply cannot co-exist.

The rapist doesn't take no for an answer. The Casanova doesn't move to sex until he has properly romanced his prey. It is part of the game. Bialek claims he attempted to shove her head in his lap without so much as a kiss or a kind word. This unrealistic accusation simply does not pass the smell test. It appears more like the work of a contrived, confused and counterfeit accuser who hasn't examined the psychological profiles of her supposed predator.

There are other problems with her contentions, too. Bialek contends that Cain upgraded her hotel room. The Casanova would take advantage of that situation, and come on to her with a visit to the nicer room he got for her. Again, this is part of the chase.

The rapist would not get her the room in the first place. He only needs a dark room, or a desolate corner to weave his trap for his victim, and his crime does not take long.

Why would the rapist ever go to the trouble of the Casanova hotel room at all? And why would the Casanova go to the trouble of the hotel room and then not light the candles, run the bathwater, put the flower petals on the bed and go for his conquest? He wouldn't. It just doesn't fit the profile.

But there are still more problems, such as Bialek's involvement in multiple lawsuits, bankruptcies and perpetual unemployment. She craves money, drama and attention. Her personality profile fits perfectly into the contrived victim/false accuser role. The parasitic nature of the repeat civil accuser is entirely consistent with the histrionic behavior exhibited thus far. The only problem is that while she so aptly fits the accuser profile, she forgot to do her homework to see that her accusations accurately fit her implied offender profile – and they are grossly contorted.

Even if she didn't happen to live in the same apartment building with known anti-American socialist and Obama cohort David Axelrod, her story is simply too full of fables for any thinking person to believe.

The "lady" doth indeed protest too much, methinks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gina Loudon, Ph.D., is the PM drive talk-show host of "The Dr. Gina Show" heard in eight states across the South and the Midwest. She appears regularly on Fox Business and Fox News, is a founding member of the National Tea Party and the founder of the BUYcott movement. She writes for WND, Big Government and Fox News Opinion, among others.

Dathan Paterno, Psy.D., is a licensed clinical psychologist and clinical director of Park Ridge Psychological Services, outside of Chicago. Working with children and families for 20 years, his expertise is equipping parents to reclaim their families using scientifically sound and proven methods. His parenting book, "Desperately Seeking Parents," includes his parenting philosophy and a wealth of practical advice for modern parents. He also maintains a parenting blog.

[IR5FORMUMSIE 850]

I'd like to hear someone refute the following reasoning, si man:

If there was si man from the C Man, then that would be something.

[mawilson 2,133]

She said he tried to stick his hand up her skirt and grab at her crotch while they were being driven in a car.

That's what she's alleging.

I don't know if it's true.

If it is true, it's pretty damn serious.

That makes him a normal red-blooded male.

I find it a lot more suspicious that no-one has any dirt on Obama. Seriously? He never fooled around with anyone? Is he even human?

[Leatherneck 693]

That's how it always goes. As a candidate rises in the polls the candidate gets put under the microscope. There's no mystery here at all.

1. In the month before her allegations, the woman walks up to Cain at a Tea Party Conference, hugs him and whipers in the mans ear.

2. Whereas 14 years before he tried to touch her genitals and force her head into his crotch- what sexually assaulted woman would be so friendly to a man that assualted her?

3. Her 13 year old son encouraged her to make her allegations public- so the alleged assault itself was not enough to go to the police, but a 13 yr was able to persuade her.

4. At no time prior to Cains three year period at the NRA and no time since has he been accused of such behavior- in 40 + years of business and work, only 3 years in question, seems odd and out of character.

5. Supposedly the man upgraded her room to a suite- yet he tried to 'do her' in a car.

6. The woman was allegedly fired for falsely accusing her boss of sexual harassment- possibly not her first time to make such claims.

Nope, "no mystery here at all," just a little credibility problem.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

1. In the month before her allegations, the woman walks up to Cain at a Tea Party Conference, hugs him and whipers in the mans ear.

That can't be true - remember that Cain claimed as recently as last week that he doesn't even know this chick.

Herman Cain: "I don't even remember" Sharon Bialek

Be that as it may, I encourage the GOP to nominate Hermann Cain. Please, nominate him.