FSU women and Sexual Harassement

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Most women start with a glance. They quickly look away but then they look back, smile coyly, and then giggle a little.

The hair sweep is crucial. Do it, and you'll set in motion two million years of evolution.

Alla has extremely short hair so cannot do that (she is growing it longer again so maybe there is hope) Women with very short hair can also lean over the kitchen counter and raise their skirt in back. It is kind of the same thing for short haired women. Subtle, yet somehow still effective.

[Leatherneck 693]

Alla has extremely short hair so cannot do that (she is growing it longer again so maybe there is hope) Women with very short hair can also lean over the kitchen counter and raise their skirt in back. It is kind of the same thing for short haired women. Subtle, yet somehow still effective.

Gary, there is nothing subtle about that. Very suggestive and even more effective! :yes:

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Gary, there is nothing subtle about that. Very suggestive and even more effective! :yes:

That is subtle.

Walking up and opening your zipper and saying "I want sex" is the direct approach

Now?

NOW.

Here?

HERE.

ok.

I wonder if she ever thinks about my soul or my emotional needs?

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

That is subtle.

Walking up and opening your zipper and saying "I want sex" is the direct approach

Now?

NOW.

Here?

HERE.

ok.

I wonder if she ever thinks about my soul or my emotional needs?

You gotta love RUB chicks. No games, just down and dirty.

[slim 1,525]

lean over the kitchen counter and raise their skirt in back. It is kind of the same thing for short haired women. Subtle, yet somehow still effective.

This is what I call passive initiation.

It's my job to constantly hound her. 24/7 I'm actively initiating through suggestive speech, contact, dancing naked directly in her line of sight, etc. A man does not passively initiate (except by keeping the bank account charged up!) we go right for it. It's no secret what we want.

Women, on the other hand, are more often passive initiators. They'll do the hair flip. They'll wear a short skirt. They'll get out of the shower and "whoops" with their towel.

Walking up and opening your zipper and saying "I want sex" is the direct approach

Now?

NOW.

Here?

HERE.

ok.

When women are the active initiator, there is no question what's on the table.

... and they get p!ssed when you're feeling "passive" that day! "Not now, honey. I'm watching NASCAR."

I wonder if she ever thinks about my soul or my emotional needs?

It's like we're just some big ol' piece of man meat they can take a bite of whenever they want. They don't even want to cuddle or anything.

I have needs!

[Ban Hammer 13,337]

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

This is what I call passive initiation.

It's my job to constantly hound her. 24/7 I'm actively initiating through suggestive speech, contact, dancing naked directly in her line of sight, etc. A man does not passively initiate (except by keeping the bank account charged up!) we go right for it. It's no secret what we want.

Women, on the other hand, are more often passive initiators. They'll do the hair flip. They'll wear a short skirt. They'll get out of the shower and "whoops" with their towel.

When women are the active initiator, there is no question what's on the table.

... and they get p!ssed when you're feeling "passive" that day! "Not now, honey. I'm watching NASCAR."

It's like we're just some big ol' piece of man meat they can take a bite of whenever they want. They don't even want to cuddle or anything.

I have needs!

We do not have TV so NASCAR is never an excuse.

Yes, they have to feel pursued every moment, if not they think you do not love them anymore or that they became "fat" (since yesterday) and not attractive.

But please, no more "dancing naked" comments, I am now afraid to close my eyes for what I might see.

They are not for beginners, Charles.

[Leatherneck 693]

That is subtle.

Walking up and opening your zipper and saying "I want sex" is the direct approach

Now?

NOW.

Here?

HERE.

ok.

I wonder if she ever thinks about my soul or my emotional needs?

Ok, considering the comparison, that would be subtle.

I like that "direct approach,"

[Leatherneck 693]

We do not have TV so NASCAR is never an excuse.

Yes, they have to feel pursued every moment, if not they think you do not love them anymore or that they became "fat" (since yesterday) and not attractive.

But please, no more "dancing naked" comments, I am now afraid to close my eyes for what I might see.

They are not for beginners, Charles.

I guess not!

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

This is what I call passive initiation.

It's my job to constantly hound her. 24/7 I'm actively initiating through suggestive speech, contact, dancing naked directly in her line of sight, etc. A man does not passively initiate (except by keeping the bank account charged up!) we go right for it. It's no secret what we want.

Women, on the other hand, are more often passive initiators. They'll do the hair flip. They'll wear a short skirt. They'll get out of the shower and "whoops" with their towel.

When women are the active initiator, there is no question what's on the table.

... and they get p!ssed when you're feeling "passive" that day! "Not now, honey. I'm watching NASCAR."

It's like we're just some big ol' piece of man meat they can take a bite of whenever they want. They don't even want to cuddle or anything.

I have needs!

That's what I don't get. If a gal says; "not now, I'm not in the mood" then that's that. But if a guy wants to watch the game...especially when the Washington Huskies are on, the guy is a total arsehole in their eyes and they have a fit. It's a double standard.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

That's what I don't get. If a gal says; "not now, I'm not in the mood" then that's that. But if a guy wants to watch the game...especially when the Washington Huskies are on, the guy is a total arsehole in their eyes and they have a fit. It's a double standard.

I have not heard that phrase since 2004! Brings back memories.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

I have not heard that phrase since 2004! Brings back memories.

Touche

I only hear it on the weekends when she sleeps in. I have a habit of waking up around 5am and Iv'e learned that's not a good time to make romantic advances.

[slim 1,525]

But please, no more "dancing naked" comments, I am now afraid to close my eyes for what I might see.

I'm sure if you searched hard enough you could find a video somewhere on this interwebz thingy.

I like that "direct approach,"

The indirect approach is the exact same thing, just leaves all the work up to you.

That's what I don't get. If a gal says; "not now, I'm not in the mood" then that's that. But if a guy wants to watch the game...especially when the Washington Huskies are on, the guy is a total arsehole in their eyes and they have a fit. It's a double standard.

And this is what feminism is built upon.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I'm sure if you searched hard enough you could find a video somewhere on this interwebz thingy.

Not sure where to start with the search engines.

Slim>dancing>naked maybe?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Ok, considering the comparison, that would be subtle.

I like that "direct approach,"

Oh not me!

Indirect involves all sorts of high heels, lacy stuff, provocative posing oh no, indirect is much better!

Direct is only for when she is afraid indirect may not get the erection reaction that is desired. OR it is needed right now and not later.