West Hollywood approves first fur ban in U.S.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

http://news.yahoo.com/west-hollywood-approves-first-fur-ban-u-181344531.html

By Jason Kandel | Reuters – 2 hrs 22 mins ago

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Putting animal rights over fashion imperatives and its own vibrant shopping scene, West Hollywood's leaders have given final approval to a first-in-the-nation ban on the sale of fur clothing within city limits.

The five-member City Council of the tiny, tony municipality wedged between Beverly Hills and Hollywood voted 3-1 with one abstention early on Tuesday to approve the ordinance, said City Councilman John Heilman, who voted no.

The ban was tentatively adopted by the council on September 20 and had been expected to win easy enactment two weeks later.

But it ran into stiff opposition from the local Chamber of Commerce and the fur industry, whose main trade group, the Fur Information Council of America, happens to be based in West Hollywood.

Opponents say nearly half of the 200 apparel stores in town sell at least some fur items, and that merchandise made with animal pelts is estimated to account for up to $2 million in revenues for those businesses each year.

But the city's famously left-leaning political establishment ultimately embraced the ban, won over by supporters' arguments that furs are produced from animals that are inhumanely killed for their pelts.

However, the date the measure will take effect was pushed back to September 21, 2013, from the original June 30, 2012, in part because city officials want to conduct their own study on how the ordinance will affect businesses, Heilman said.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Some city ought to seriously consider a ban on PETA (and similar chop#### "animal-rights" groups)!

[natty bumppo 297]

However, the date the measure will take effect was pushed back to September 21, 2013, from the original June 30, 2012, in part because city officials want to conduct their own study on how the ordinance will affect businesses, Heilman said.

translated .... let's pass this ordinance before we figure out what impact it will have on business within our district

whatever happened to ... let's do the homework before class, not after class is dismissed ...

[The_Dude 1,142]

I know this is Kip's pathetic attempt to poke at California, but I think the salient point in this is the lost tax revenue versus a moral decision. The article mentions that there are quite a few clothing retailers that sell some sort of fur lined or based product. I really hope that the business' move out of West Hollywood and give them the finger on the way.

[_Simpson_ 250]

Mississippi is banning abortion why hollywood bans fur, you have to love their priorities.

Edited November 9, 2011 by _Simpson_

[mawilson 2,133]

A furban? Is that like a turban made out of fur?