G325A

[meadowzephyr 26]

I guess you could say I'm transitioning to the paranoia phase of the visa journey. I have a question. On both mine and my fiance's G325A forms where it asks for "city and county of birth" I only put our city and state of birth. My fiance is Mexican. Later in the packet I included birth certificates for both of us. Do you think this will result in an RFE?

[skiptex 225]

i don't know.. why did you not put country

[meadowzephyr 26]

i don't know.. why did you not put country

It was a mistake. I didn't' realize I had done that until I looked over my copy.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I guess you could say I'm transitioning to the paranoia phase of the visa journey. I have a question. On both mine and my fiance's G325A forms where it asks for "city and county of birth" I only put our city and state of birth. My fiance is Mexican. Later in the packet I included birth certificates for both of us. Do you think this will result in an RFE?

I doubt it.

You can mention it at the interview if you want. But by then the use of the form is pretty much done.

The G-325a is used for many visa types and many procedures. You will do another one for the AOS. The MAIN purpose of the G-325a for the K-1 is to use it to sort out name matches on background checks. For example, if your name happens to be John Dillinger, the G-325a helps them to figure out you are not THAT John Dillinger. Lacking information may cause you a delay in a name check, if needed.

[meadowzephyr 26]

I doubt it.

You can mention it at the interview if you want. But by then the use of the form is pretty much done.

The G-325a is used for many visa types and many procedures. You will do another one for the AOS. The MAIN purpose of the G-325a for the K-1 is to use it to sort out name matches on background checks. For example, if your name happens to be John Dillinger, the G-325a helps them to figure out you are not THAT John Dillinger. Lacking information may cause you a delay in a name check, if needed.

Thank you for that clear, informative reply.

[skiptex 225]

It was a mistake. I didn't' realize I had done that until I looked over my copy.

i noticed that too.. LOL>> i was a little taken aback by that.. i am not submitting till JAN so i think i got that one covered..

[meadowzephyr 26]

i noticed that too.. LOL>> i was a little taken aback by that.. i am not submitting till JAN so i think i got that one covered..

Yes, check an double check and then check again!