California flubs again

[^_^ 5,021]

Pretty sad that Charles posted in the thread after the obvious baiting/trolling started from the original poster. Yeah, I know, it's report driven, but if something is blatantly in front of you, you still going to ignore it? Willfull ignorance is bliss I guess.

maybe he forgot he has powers in PR now... cut him some slack.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

what Morons!

I assure you they can be converted back and any of the parts except the receiver (which is unaltered for this modification) can be ordered on the internet and I can do the change in about 3 minutes.

That aside, so a guy walks into the 7-11 with an MP5 and you are going to argue with him? Sure, bash him a coffee pot because maybe it is one of those that can't shoot real bullets. #######????????????? Then CA will try to outlaw coffee pots.

Read it again. What effin' idiots!

I couldn't agree with you more Gary. What really worries me is that there's a good chance that once these weapons are converted back that they will be used by violent criminals to commit crimes against unarmed citizens.

[Leatherneck 693]

Pretty sad that Charles posted in the thread after the obvious baiting/trolling started from the original poster. Yeah, I know, it's report driven, but if something is blatantly in front of you, you still going to ignore it? Willfull ignorance is bliss I guess.

Quite unfortunate you find it necessary to characterize a worthy news story with obvious impact to those that care and seek to exercise 2nd Amendment rights in California, as

"baiting/trolling started from the original poster."

[^_^ 5,021]

Quite unfortunate you find it necessary to characterize a worthy news story with obvious impact to those that care and seek to exercise 2nd Amendment rights in California, as

"baiting/trolling started from the original poster."

You have no idea which post he's talking about.

[The_Dude 1,142]

I couldn't agree with you more Gary. What really worries me is that there's a good chance that once these weapons are converted back that they will be used by violent criminals to commit crimes against unarmed citizens.

That is quite scary. There are so many criminals out there, who in my opinion should be kicked out of the country competely.

Quite unfortunate you find it necessary to characterize a worthy news story with obvious impact to those that care and seek to exercise 2nd Amendment rights in California, as

"baiting/trolling started from the original poster."

You haven o clue ####### you're talking about, so just stop right there. If you read the first two posts, you'd actually know, but you didn't, and now you can't because the blatant trolling posts are invisible.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

That is quite scary. There are so many criminals out there, who in my opinion should be kicked out of the country competely.

You haven o clue ####### you're talking about, so just stop right there. If you read the first two posts, you'd actually know, but you didn't, and now you can't because the blatant trolling posts are invisible.

I see the OP and Gary's post but I don't see any baiting in those post.

[^_^ 5,021]

I see the OP and Gary's post but I don't see any baiting in those post.

The bait post (very early in this thread) that was removed (or made invisible, whatever) was written by you.

Edited October 18, 2011 by \

[The_Dude 1,142]

I see the OP and Gary's post but I don't see any baiting in those post.

Don't play coy Kip, you're not good at it. You know full well your troll posts were made invisible.

[Leatherneck 693]

That is quite scary. There are so many criminals out there, who in my opinion should be kicked out of the country competely.

You haven o clue ####### you're talking about, so just stop right there. If you read the first two posts, you'd actually know, but you didn't, and now you can't because the blatant trolling posts are invisible.

I errorously related your remarks to the now closed thread.

Edited October 18, 2011 by Leatherneck

[Ban Hammer 13,746]

Pretty sad that Charles posted in the thread after the obvious baiting/trolling started from the original poster. Yeah, I know, it's report driven, but if something is blatantly in front of you, you still going to ignore it? Willfull ignorance is bliss I guess.

i replied to the op, then had some work to do - at work. annoying, i know. i'd rather be on vj.

[The_Dude 1,142]

i replied to the op, then had some work to do - at work. annoying, i know. i'd rather be on vj.

Right, you didn't see the post immediately after the OP. Sure Charles, I believe that.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Don't play coy Kip, you're not good at it. You know full well your troll posts were made invisible.

Besides he isn't even paid to answer! Oh, wait.

[Ban Hammer 13,746]

Right, you didn't see the post immediately after the OP. Sure Charles, I believe that.

you may believe what you like.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

i replied to the op, then had some work to do - at work. annoying, i know. i'd rather be on vj.

You are not a professional poster Charles. Then again, I bet no one is going to walk in and steal all your guns either.

[Ban Hammer 13,746]

You are not a professional poster Charles. Then again, I bet no one is going to walk in and steal all your guns either.

i hate it when work gets in the way of vj and facebook!