Jump to content

76 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I never worked for a poor guy.

You know, if a few more people actually spent some time figuring out how to make more money rather than how to limit others, they just might actually realize that making money is not that hard.

event.png

July 5, 2011 - Mailed 129f

July 8, 2011 - NOA1

July 10, 2011 - Touch

October 4, 2011 - NOA2

October 18, 2011 - NVC Receive

October 20, 2011 - NVC Depart

October 24, 2011 - Consulate Receive

November 28, 2011 - Appointment scheduled.

November 28, 2011 - Visa Approved!

December 2, 2011 - Visa in hand,

December 22, 2011 - Fly to Russia.

January 5, 2012 - Return together - POE - IAD (Dulles)

February 25. 2012 - Marriage

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

perhaps you could spend some time reading about bonds.

Enlighten me because apparently my understanding of public bonds is limited to what I've read in the news.

Case in point - our federal and state prisons. Many of them are privately operated facilities and for-profit, but are built using bonds.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

I'm sure my inferior intelligence fails to grasp that isn't the same with what I was talking about - private enterprise using public funding.

FINANCING PRISONS



Until about the mid-1980's, when total state expenditures on prisons and related activities were $9.6 billion, about 40 percent of all state prison construction was financed by the pay-as-you- go method and 50 percent by general obligation bonds. The remaining 10 percent was financed using lease revenue bonds and other revenue streams.1

By 1996, when total state expenditures for prisons were estimated to be $22 billion, more than half of all the debt issued to finance prisons was carried out through a specific variant of lease-revenue bonds called certificates of participation (COPs).2
  • In the pay-as-you-go method, total capital projects are fully paid for in cash at the time of construction from current revenues or accumulated cash. Its obvious advantage is that it does not involve interest payments or other expenses associated with debt as no money is borrowed.
  • With general obligation bonds, projects are paid out of tax revenues and backed by the full faith and credit of the government. Many states have statutory and constitutional limits on both the total amount as well as the amount of new debt that they can issue. General obligation bonds also require voter approval.
  • In the case of lease revenue bonds, an entity or agency is specifically created to build the project, which then leases the right to use it to the government. The bonds are repaid by rent or lease payments that are appropriated by the legislature and paid for by taxpayers.



STATE AND FEDERAL EXPENDITURES ON CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

Total Expenditures and Capital Expenditures3

  • State expenditures (including the District of Columbia) for adult prisons were estimated to be $22 billion for 1996, the most recent data available from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Overall, between 1990 and 1996, state prison expenditures increased 83 percent from $12 billion to $22 billion.
  • Of these, capital expenditures (on construction, land and equipment) were 6 percent of total expenditures, i.e., a total of $1.3 billion. Construction costs at $0.8 billion represented 4 percent, while equipment and land at $0.3 and $0.2 billion each represented about 1 percent of total expenditures.
  • Federal prison expenditures increased 160 percent, from $946 million to $2.5 billion, during the same period.

NUMBER OF FACILITIES AND SECURITY LEVELS According to the 2000 edition of the Census of State and Federal Correctional Facilities, there were a total of 1,668 state, federal and privately operated correctional facilities in 2000, or 204 more than in 1995.4 These included prisons, boot camps, prison hospitals, centers for substance abuse, community-based facilities and other places of confinement.

  • Of the total 1,668 correctional facilities in the country in 2000, 1,320 were state facilities, 264 were private and the remaining 84 were federal facilities.
  • Of the 204 new facilities built between 1995 and 2000, 154 or three quarters were private facilities, an increase of 140 percent in the number of such facilities from 1995.

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I'm sure my inferior intelligence fails to grasp that isn't the same with what I was talking about - private enterprise using public funding.

I think you got that backwards, dude.

Public bonds means the government is borrowing money from private enterprise, not vice versa.

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

I think you got that backwards, dude.

Public bonds means the government is borrowing money from private enterprise, not vice versa.

Privately owned and operated state and federal prisons were built using public bonds. While the bond holders maybe investors, the ones footing the cost in the end are the taxpayers, which was the point I was making. Without that public funding, these private prisons would not be able to build, unless they found private investors willing to risk without any government backed guarantee and there aren't any. So the fact is that private enterprise often relies on public funds in the form of bonds in order to build.

A general obligation bond is a common type of municipal bond in the United States that is secured by a state or local government's pledge to use legally available resources, including tax revenues, to repay bond holders.

Most general obligation pledges at the local government level include a pledge to levy a property tax to meet debt service requirements, in which case holders of general obligation bonds have a right to compel the borrowing government to levy that tax to satisfy the local government's obligation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_obligation_bond

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Enlighten me because apparently my understanding of public bonds is limited to what I've read in the news.

Case in point - our federal and state prisons. Many of them are privately operated facilities and for-profit, but are built using bonds.

Not likely. Left wing misconceptions and propaganda maybe.

Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Privately owned and operated state and federal prisons were built using public bonds. While the bond holders maybe investors, the ones footing the cost in the end are the taxpayers, which was the point I was making. Without that public funding, these private prisons would not be able to build, unless they found private investors willing to risk without any government backed guarantee and there aren't any. So the fact is that private enterprise often relies on public funds in the form of bonds in order to build.

http://en.wikipedia....obligation_bond

Seems you are still confused. Now show a link to where the private prisons issue public bonds. Now if it is a state prison they do issue public bonds and tax payers have to pay for the bonds. Now the private prisons in Texas issue corporate bonds. They are paid back by tax payers in that the private prisons get a certain amount per day for each prisoner in revenue from the state and they use this revenue to pay their corporate bonds. (taxpayers) Now the costs has been shown that the private prisons can do cheaper than what it costs the state to do and even get a profit.

Edited by luckytxn
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...