Jump to content

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Service sector growth slows, employment mixed

(Reuters) - Service sector activity growth slowed in September, but other data on Wednesday showed private employment up modestly for the month, suggesting that overall the economic recovery is sluggish.

Service sector activity slowed as a contraction in employment eclipsed a jump in new orders, but a second report showed private-sector employers overall added more jobs than expected, while a third report showed a jump in planned layoffs in the month.

"Beneath the surface, it's actually a fairly mixed report," said Tom Porcelli, chief economist, at RBC Capital Markets, in New York.

"The hard data are not pointing toward a recession yet. Financial markets are telling you a completely different story. Copper, equities, Treasuries -- they're all pointing in the direction of a downturn."

The data comes ahead of Friday's monthly report on total U.S. nonfarm payrolls from the U.S. Labor Department which is expected to see a gain of 60,000 payrolls last month, according to a Reuters survey, after being unchanged in August.

U.S. SERVICE SECTOR GROWTH MODERATES

The Institute for Supply Management said its services index dipped to 53.0 last month from 53.3 in August. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the sector. Economists polled by Reuters had expected a reading of 52.9 in September.

Employment in the sector, which accounts for about 80 percent of U.S. economic activity and nonfarm payrolls, fell last month to its lowest level since April 2010. A gauge of new orders rose to 56.9 from 52.8 in August.

But in a separate report from payrolls processor ADP overall private payrolls rose by 91,000 above expectations for a gain of 75,000 in a Reuters poll.

August private payrolls were revised down to an increase of 89,000 from the previously reported 91,000.

A third report showed the number of planned layoffs at U.S. firms in September jumped to its highest in more than two years due to heavy cutbacks by the U.S. military and Bank of America, another report on Wednesday showed.

Employers announced 115,730 planned job cuts last month, more than double August's total of 51,114, according to the report from consultants Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

The figure was the highest since April 2009 when 132,590 layoffs were announced.

September's job cuts were also much higher than the same time a year ago, tripling from the 37,151 job cuts announced in September 2010. For 2011 so far, employers have announced 479,064 cuts, up 16.5 percent from the first nine months of 2010.

"It looks like we're still seeing the private sector create jobs, which is consistent with a slow-growing economy," said Gary Thayer, chief macroeconomic strategist, at Wells Fargo Advisors, in St. Louis, Missouri.

"The problem is the government sector is cutting jobs. So it looks like we'll get a weak, but slightly positive, jobs number on Friday."

PLANNED LAYOFFS FROM TWO EMPLOYERS

The rise in the number of planned layoffs in September was largely from the military and Bank of America.

"It is important to keep in mind that 80,000 cuts, or nearly 70 percent of last month's total, came from just two organizations: Bank of America and the United States Army," John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said in a statement.

"Neither of these cuts is directly related to recent softness in the economy."

Bank of America's 30,000 planned cuts stemmed from continued fallout from the U.S. housing market collapse and restructuring efforts to remake the bank into a smaller, more efficient company, Challenger said.

The 50,000 military cuts were the result of drawing down forces in two wars and cost-cutting efforts in all areas of the federal government. September's cuts followed an announced 17,500 reduction in August, he added.

On the hiring front, employers announced plans to add 76,551 workers in September, down from 123,076 a year ago, according to the Challenger report.

It predicted seasonal hiring would be about the same as 2010 when retailers hired more than 600,000 holiday workers in the last three months of the year.

Friday's total September nonfarm payrolls report from the U.S. Labor Department is seen being boosted by the return to work of 45,000 striking Verizon Communications workers. However, the underlying labor market trend likely remained weak, with no improvement in the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent and average weekly work hours at 34.2 hours.

The economy needs to grew by at least an annual rate of 2.5 percent and payrolls expand 150,000 a month on a sustained basis to keep the jobless rate from rising.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/05/us-usa-economy-idUSTRE78C33C20111005?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=22&sp=true

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

short version...

Obama is toast

The long version is, Gary is a political neophyte and has no idea what he is talking about. I don't think it will be an easy re-election, but if you're writting him off now, you have no clue.

Edited by The_Dude
Filed: Timeline
Posted

The long version is, Gary is a political neophyte and has no idea what he is talking about. I don't think it will be an easy re-election, but if you're writting him off now, you have no clue.

I agree. I am just surprised that we haven't seen any challenger from the left. When California holds its primary next year, I may have to leave that bubble blank. However, Lynn Woolsey is finally retiring, so that will be satisfying enough to chose someone else to replace her.

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I agree. I am just surprised that we haven't seen any challenger from the left. When California holds its primary next year, I may have to leave that bubble blank. However, Lynn Woolsey is finally retiring, so that will be satisfying enough to chose someone else to replace her.

Has Feinstein said when she is going to retire yet? As to someone running on the left, I bet Kucinich runs, just to remind Obama that he technically leans to the left.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...