Jump to content

2 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

September 19, 2011

Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has won a significant legal battle concerning gun control in New York.

The case of Kachalsky, et al. v. Cacace, et al, raised the question of whether or not individuals have a right to carry a concealed handgun in public.

The Second Amendment Foundation, along with five individual plaintiffs, filed a federal lawsuit against Westchester County, seeking a permanent injunction against enforcement of a state law that requires a person applying for a concealed gun permit to show "good cause" for his or her application.

The plaintiffs argued that this requirement infringes on their Second Amendment rights. Two of the plaintiffs, Alan Kachalsky and Christina Nikolov, applied for a permit and were denied. Kachalsky was denied because he could not "demonstrate a need for self protection distinguishable from that of the general public" and Nikolov because she could not prove that there was "any type of threat to her own safety anywhere."

The constitutional challenge was rejected by Southern District Judge Cathy Seibel who, agreeing with the state's gun control laws, granted the state a motion for summary judgment and dismissed the plaintiff's case.

The plaintiffs cited two recent Supreme Court decisions in their arguments. In the 2007 case of District of Columbia v Heller and the 2009 case of McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court confirmed that the right to bear arms is guaranteed not only to citizens who own firearms for militia purposes, but who wish to possess them for lawful reasons, and that this right is guaranteed not only by the federal government, but applies to state governments as well, as per the Fourteenth Amendment.

Schneiderman's office represented the defendants.

Along with Westchester County, Susan Cacace and Jeffrey Cohen were named as defendants because they both served as handgun permit licensing officers for Westchester County.

The defendants argued that the "proper cause" provision was not unconstitutional because it did not violate the precedents set by the Supreme Court in Heller and McDonald. Seibel agreed with the defendants, ruling that the Second Amendment does guarantee a person's right to keep and bear arms in his home, but does not guarantee without restriction, a person's right to carry concealed handguns in public.

Seibel went on to elaborate that even if the Second Amendment did guarantee that right, New York State's "proper cause" provision would still be considered constitutional because the law exists to preserve the important government interest of promoting public safety by cutting down crimes committed by concealed handguns. She additionally ruled that the provision did not violate the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution because it didn't discriminate between license applicants. Despite his organization's loss in New York State Southern District Court, Dave Workman, spokesman for the Second Amendment Foundation, remains optimistic. "I think it's a little too soon for the defendants to be having a victory dance … this case is going to be appealed," he said. "Our attorney Alan Gura lost the two cases (Heller and McDonald) … in the lower courts, but managed to bring them all the way to the Supreme Court … he won where it counts."

Executive Vice President of the Second Amendment Foundation Alan Gottlieb echoed Workman's sentiment. "Thanks to our recent victory before the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in this country, not a 'Bill of Needs,'" Gottlieb said. Executive Director of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence Jackie Hilly is satisfied with the court's decision.

"It was a really good victory for the public safety in New York." She was pleased that "the proper cause provision has been named constitutional." In response to the idea that this case could go to the Supreme Court, Hilly answered "the Supreme Court was pretty clear in Heller. As [supreme Court Justice Antonin] Scalia said, '[the Second Amendment] doesn't mean any gun, anywhere, any time.'"

link

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

So they didn't actually win the lawsuit, and both sides are claiming victory. #######?

demotivational_posters_merica_VERY_Demotivational_Pics_2-s492x454-80152.jpg

'Merica...... who gives a sh!t about our schools falling behind, an economic recession, or another war in the middle east, when we can spend our time and money fighting to carry concealed weapons in public. We're one step closer to a shootout at McDonalds cause they ran out of Batman commemerative cups.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...