Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

When gays start reproducing among themselves then I might start buying into the bs that they are an actual couple. Until that happens though they can keep barking up a tree.

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

I have read the bill 3 times now and no where am seeing gays singled out in the bill. You should look around at some of my posts. I have written that gays are no less human than straight people are. And I still do believe that to be true. But in this particular piece of legislation it does not violate their civil rights any more than it violates some one who chooses not to marry.

Oh come on. This law was designed to deny the civil rights of gay couples who have already been outlawed from marrying in Michigan. Pretending this wasn't targeted at gay couples is beyond absurd. Context is everything.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Greece
Timeline
Posted

Oh come on. This law was designed to deny the civil rights of gay couples who have already been outlawed from marrying in Michigan. Pretending this wasn't targeted at gay couples is beyond absurd. Context is everything.

We'll have to agree, to disagree. I'd tend to think that there will be just as many straight couples as gay couples affected by this particular bill. The difference is that the straight couples don't have a victim card to pull out.

Thank you Lord Infamous for showing us what the law clearly states in Michigan as voted on by the citizens and upheld by the courts. :thumbs:

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
When gays start reproducing among themselves then I might start buying into the bs that they are an actual couple. Until that happens though they can keep barking up a tree.

My wife and I aren't reproducing. Are we not a couple?

Oh come on. This law was designed to deny the civil rights of gay couples who have already been outlawed from marrying in Michigan. Pretending this wasn't targeted at gay couples is beyond absurd. Context is everything.

Context has nothing to do with the law. What the law says is what goes.

For example, check out the Gun Control Act of 1968. It was clearly put in place to limit the firepower of colored folks yet it's hampered all of us from private ownership without infringement.

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

My wife and I aren't reproducing. Are we not a couple?

you need to practice more :innocent:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
you need to practice more :innocent:

Why anyone would reproduce is beyond me.

Kids are annoying. They're expensive. They serve no purpose in the modern world.

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Civil Rights aren't limited to race. Do you not think that gay people have civil rights?

And not only gay people, Bi-sexuals too, how dare any state tell Bi-sexual people they must choose either a man or woman... but not both.

It's rather cruel to deny these folks the full expression of their orientation..... by not covering both partners of the employee.

Think about that, the State making this Bi-sexual employee choose which one will get coverage.

:whistle:

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

And not only gay people, Bi-sexuals too, how dare any state tell Bi-sexual people they must choose either a man or woman... but not both.

It's rather cruel to deny these folks the full expression of their orientation..... by not covering both partners of the employee.

Think about that, the State making this Bi-sexual employee choose which one will get coverage.

:whistle:

What an ignorant assumption to make Danno. You assume that Bi-sexuals are by default always in an open relationship and that they expect to be covered by their partner's benefits. You also assume that gay people want to have sex with you. Sorry, to be the one to inform you of this Danno, but gay people have morals and standards. Who are you to determine what civil rights are applicable to which citizens of this country? To actually address your insipid scenario, I imagine the state would handle a non-monogomous bi-sexual arrangement the same as if a man with a wife and a girlfriend wanted to insure both, and that is to make you pay for the 2nd beneficiary yourself.

Posted

And not only gay people, Bi-sexuals too, how dare any state tell Bi-sexual people they must choose either a man or woman... but not both.

It's rather cruel to deny these folks the full expression of their orientation..... by not covering both partners of the employee.

Think about that, the State making this Bi-sexual employee choose which one will get coverage.

:whistle:

:thumbs:

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

And not only gay people, Bi-sexuals too, how dare any state tell Bi-sexual people they must choose either a man or woman... but not both.

It's rather cruel to deny these folks the full expression of their orientation..... by not covering both partners of the employee.

Think about that, the State making this Bi-sexual employee choose which one will get coverage.

:whistle:

Does this mean that the taxpayers should have to cover all three of my wives, one is white, one is Latino"Brasilian" and the other is black, although the Braislian considers herself black.

Which one or ones would they deny ?

Does that make me trisexual ?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Does this mean that the taxpayers should have to cover all three of my wives, one is white, one is Latino"Brasilian" and the other is black, although the Braislian considers herself black.

Which one or ones would they deny ?

Does that make me trisexual ?

As a very real issue in Michigan, what is their policy on multiple spouses?

Michigan has a lot of "religious folks" who have more than one wife.

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...