my wife cheated on me when i was in morocco

[almaty 19]

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

you did a gooooooood job sister faith

[john_and_marlene 162]

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

oral sex with some other than your spouse across state borders - who's public indecency laws would you be violating? both states? what if you are on the line exactly - meaning you are neither here nor there....then what?

i think we should get someone to test it out and see how the courts rule. very important thread we have going here.

... and where do they bury the survivors?

[faith 0]

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

oral sex with some other than your spouse across state borders - who's public indecency laws would you be violating? both states? what if you are on the line exactly - meaning you are neither here nor there....then what?

i think we should get someone to test it out and see how the courts rule. very important thread we have going here.

we need a guinea pig, yes.. we could put an ad out in the St. Louis Post Dispatch. And would my clout with the lawyers here in town corrupt the results if I retained one of them to defend our guinea pig?

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

you did a gooooooood job sister faith

*bows* thank you very much

[honeyblonde 0]

Someone has to be the leader and somehwere there should be laws. or there will be complete anarchy and chaos

You mean like in this thread?

Islamic law does not, as you would have me believe, cure the underlying ill by making it legal for males to enage in polygamy, i.e. have multiple spouses.

Islamic law does accomodate the natural male need to pork more than one woman. Western law turns the fulfillment of that need into something ugly - adultery. Islamic law beautifies it by allowing you to call it marriage.

Lipstick on a pig, y'know.

pigs are forbidden in islam. all we got left with is the lipstick.

So now you're all just crossdressers?

Well thats easy Et, how can a woman look after the needs of two housholds of men and kids. I guess can get a room house in the middle have intercom and cell phone. and thent here is the inherent difference between men and women in reagarding sex and love. I would have a hard time being able Love and care for more than one man and set of kids. would not be able to do it

AJ you having harem fantasies again??

Cindi, you have it backwards. With more than one man the woman can relax and let the men take care of the kids and do all the work. There was a documentary on a tribe in South America recently and that's how they did it there. Each man took care of his kids, each had specific tasks in supporting the family, and each did some of the chores. The woman just had a lot of sex and ran things.

again back to the someone should look after the widows , divorcees ,and single mommas etc.

If there is brothers capable and strong enough to do it , then more power to them

I thought that's what the extended family was good for? Or can't an Islamic man support a woman he can't legally take to bed?

Also Cindi, I was not in any way condoning infidelity in my previous post. You had said to the guy to just get over it, and everyone else was acting like he was fake. I was trying to justify the fact that he might actually be for real. But then again, we're off topic now, so how dare I refer back to the original post!

[dawnnhatem 0]

Look what you guys have done to this thread. You made me feel really bad about not kindly addressing the OPs dilemma with useful answers...and I caved. ohhh, never again. It was you guys that pointed out that his sorry self should have a safe place to find answers and that I was discouraging new members from asking questions....I felt obligated to apologize for interferring with his thread and look at this now???

Unbelievable

It is funny, though

the guy was an obvious troll chopf##k, dawn.. you are too sweet to put up and be concerned over his need for group attention....

no one called me sweet yesterday

[Ameristralian 0]

it's better than missouri.... (not sure if it's still on the books but...) oral sex is illegal there.

what if you are on the illinois/missouri border engaged in oral sex (with someone other than a spouse) over state lines, can you be tried in both states for both being adultrous and engaging in oral sex?

what part of you is in which state? .... Nevermind .... I really don't want to know

thanks guys.. now i'm at work picturing someone on the poplar street bridge (bridge between st louis and illinois) having oral sex

Now it's on a public bridge???? I think you just involved a few more violations.

well considering that the mississippi river is the border between illinois and missouri, it would have to involve a bridge..... or a barge...

or scuba gear or a ski boat .... or skiing behind a ski boat ... this couple may be multi-talented

Ooh my two cents! What about on Metrolink?? It goes over there! And as far as bridges go, I'd go with the chain of rocks bridge, so no worries about traffic...it's for nonvehicles only.

[faith 0]

Ooh my two cents! What about on Metrolink?? It goes over there! And as far as bridges go, I'd go with the chain of rocks bridge, so no worries about traffic...it's for nonvehicles only.

oooh the metro... i didn't even think about that!!!!! or the chain of rocks bridge (it's a pedestrian bridge for you non st louisians) hmmm that brings out some new ideas

[almaty 19]

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

oral sex with some other than your spouse across state borders - who's public indecency laws would you be violating? both states? what if you are on the line exactly - meaning you are neither here nor there....then what?

i think we should get someone to test it out and see how the courts rule. very important thread we have going here.

we need a guinea pig, yes.. we could put an ad out in the St. Louis Post Dispatch. And would my clout with the lawyers here in town corrupt the results if I retained one of them to defend our guinea pig?

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

you did a gooooooood job sister faith

*bows* thank you very much

...

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

oral sex with some other than your spouse across state borders - who's public indecency laws would you be violating? both states? what if you are on the line exactly - meaning you are neither here nor there....then what?

i think we should get someone to test it out and see how the courts rule. very important thread we have going here.

we need a guinea pig, yes.. we could put an ad out in the St. Louis Post Dispatch. And would my clout with the lawyers here in town corrupt the results if I retained one of them to defend our guinea pig?

i thought it was some kind of unspoken rule that we (meaning all message board users) had to corrupt a thread by at least page 6??? *shrugs*

you did a gooooooood job sister faith

*bows* thank you very much

Faith, you don't need a lawyer for a guinea pig..let me round up a couple of my more risque clients and i sent them over..and in fact, suggest they do it on the middle of the eads bridge...

Edited February 23, 2006 by almaty2004

[Welshcookie 17]

Look what you guys have done to this thread. You made me feel really bad about not kindly addressing the OPs dilemma with useful answers...and I caved. ohhh, never again. It was you guys that pointed out that his sorry self should have a safe place to find answers and that I was discouraging new members from asking questions....I felt obligated to apologize for interferring with his thread and look at this now???

Unbelievable

It is funny, though

the guy was an obvious troll chopf##k, dawn.. you are too sweet to put up and be concerned over his need for group attention....

no one called me sweet yesterday

You weren't mean at all I didn't think....and you certainly weren't the only one...say it as you see it, plenty do...I am not getting involved in heated discussions at the moment in an attempt to be 'good'....hehehehehehe

This thread has got far more interesting anyway...

[almaty 19]

Look what you guys have done to this thread. You made me feel really bad about not kindly addressing the OPs dilemma with useful answers...and I caved. ohhh, never again. It was you guys that pointed out that his sorry self should have a safe place to find answers and that I was discouraging new members from asking questions....I felt obligated to apologize for interferring with his thread and look at this now???

Unbelievable

It is funny, though

the guy was an obvious troll chopf##k, dawn.. you are too sweet to put up and be concerned over his need for group attention....

no one called me sweet yesterday

well, they are blinded by their own importance..you are always sweet in my book...............

[junglee069 0]

i'm so foncused.

what if its two way oral? 69?

then what happens - is that two seperate charges of oral sex?

[faith 0]

i'm so foncused.

what if its two way oral? 69?

then what happens - is that two seperate charges of oral sex?

again that's a theory that we need to have someone test out

[dawnnhatem 0]

Look what you guys have done to this thread. You made me feel really bad about not kindly addressing the OPs dilemma with useful answers...and I caved. ohhh, never again. It was you guys that pointed out that his sorry self should have a safe place to find answers and that I was discouraging new members from asking questions....I felt obligated to apologize for interferring with his thread and look at this now???

Unbelievable

It is funny, though

the guy was an obvious troll chopf##k, dawn.. you are too sweet to put up and be concerned over his need for group attention....

no one called me sweet yesterday

well, they are blinded by their own importance..you are always sweet in my book...............

thank you!!!

[ceriserose 1]

Islamic law does not, as you would have me believe, cure the underlying ill by making it legal for males to enage in polygamy, i.e. have multiple spouses.

Islamic law does accomodate the natural male need to pork more than one woman. Western law turns the fulfillment of that need into something ugly - adultery. Islamic law beautifies it by allowing you to call it marriage.

Lipstick on a pig, y'know.

pigs are forbidden in islam. all we got left with is the lipstick.

I was doing nicely staying out of this thread until I became compelled to ask.

So what shade do you wear, Junglee?

[almaty 19]

Islamic law does not, as you would have me believe, cure the underlying ill by making it legal for males to enage in polygamy, i.e. have multiple spouses.

Islamic law does accomodate the natural male need to pork more than one woman. Western law turns the fulfillment of that need into something ugly - adultery. Islamic law beautifies it by allowing you to call it marriage.

Lipstick on a pig, y'know.

pigs are forbidden in islam. all we got left with is the lipstick.

I was doing nicely staying out of this thread until I became compelled to ask.

So what shade do you wear, Junglee?

aw just wrong sister ceCrise..but i am curious too..

Edited February 23, 2006 by almaty2004