need help plz

[RICARDO4EVA2 194]

had it bn Private,u never shld ve sought the opinions of thousands that will be reading you

You are saying that all the information above isn't given with a careful thought?

The poster knows what was done to allow entry into the USA even though the qualifications were not met.

[elkhris 7]

You are saying that all the information above isn't given with a careful thought?

The poster knows what was done to allow entry into the USA even though the qualifications were not met.

I believe he is referring to this:

What consulate did your wife go for the interview? just curious

am sorry this private thing

Edited September 8, 2011 by elkhris

[Boiler 46,125]

I have seen people in this situation post before, but have never found out what happened.

Seems quite common.

Ditto the Lawyer, be prepared to bend over and take it.

[Harsh_77 718]

had it bn Private,u never shld ve sought the opinions of thousands that will be reading you

That would not matter, as CO has already confronted her with her previous marriage certifcate.

Which means USCIS is aware of the fraud.

[SAKO 0]

BUT THE OFFICER ASK FOR MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE AND DEFERRING THINGS LIKE TAX RETURN 2010 AND NEW PHOTO

Edited September 9, 2011 by SAKO

[bigdog 376]

Material misrepresentation is not good, see an attorney immediately.

[RICARDO4EVA2 194]

BUT THE OFFICER ASK FOR MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE AND DEFERRING THINGS LIKE TAX RETURN 2010 AND NEW PHOTO

this means nothing. it is standard procedure to request new/updated information during the interview for qualified applicants. i would like to ask you a question... feel free to send me it in a private message. Why did you not tell the persons during your interview in 97 that you were married..?

[JimVaPhuong 4,863]

BUT THE OFFICER ASK FOR MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE AND DEFERRING THINGS LIKE TAX RETURN 2010 AND NEW PHOTO

You are deportable under INA section 237(a)(1)(A) because you were inadmissible when you entered the US. You were inadmissible because you got your visa under fraudulent circumstances - INA 212(a)(6)(c). You committed fraud again when you filed for your husband using fraudulent documents - another INA 212(a)(6)(c) violation.

Theoretically, an I-601 fraud waiver is possible to obtain a stay of deportation if the parent who petitioned for you can show your removal from the United States would cause them extreme hardship. If it was approved it would even nullify the fact that you weren't eligible for the visa when you received it. This is because the US government makes extraordinary exceptions in the interest of family unity. However, it's very difficult to get them to overlook intentional fraud to obtain an immigration benefit not just once but twice. I would personally be stunned beyond words if an I-601 was approved for you.