Female sailor sues Aussie Navy for failing to detect pregnancy

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

But to be accurate you were actually given a general discharge under honorable conditions. When you say it like you did up there ^^^- you are making it sound like you were given an honorable discharge, which you were not.

Reading comprehension problems? Maybe. It's just you SAY so much and to use Alan's terminology use weasle words, and I see you are bitter about not getting BTZ....Sorry you blew it.

He didn't imply anything other than the facts. Normally I would say use "google" but seeing how you were in the air force you know that discharge exist. If peeps on here take it different than what he posted, maybe they should try using google.

[Robert&Liliya 31]

I think we should get back on topic. There are way too many Seamen jokes to pass up here not to mention the amount of jokes about the number of ships in port as well as the welcome aboard jokes we could be making.

Join in if you know the words. “If you’re pregnant and you know it sue the Navy”

[Captain Oates 911]

I think we should get back on topic. There are way too many Seamen jokes to pass up here not to mention the amount of jokes about the number of ships in port as well as the welcome aboard jokes we could be making.

Join in if you know the words. “If you’re pregnant and you know it sue the Navy”

Love it !!!

Hope the audience lets go of their bone (in the non US sense) and gets back to some real smut!

What we need is the Dutchy to tell us how John Boehner's name is pronounced in German. It sure aint Bayner

oh and while she is at it - the Koch brothers in Wisconsin too - even better - it aint coke

MSNBC are missing a glorious feast of smut if they went there

Come on Knufflebeest and tell us !

Edited August 31, 2011 by Alan the Red

[tmma 467]

................. Normally I would say use "google" but seeing how you were in the air force you know that discharge exist. .................

Everyone gets discharged! It's the differences in the manner of discharge. No confusion here, are you understanding it all OK so far?

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Maybe clicking +1 on TOS violations should be a TOS violation too

+1

[Captain Oates 911]

+1

yippee look out you chocolate soldiers - the field marshall is here to sort out all your dishonorable green discharges !

+20 xxxxxx

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

yippee look out you chocolate soldiers - the field marshall is here to sort out all your dishonorable green discharges !

+20 xxxxxx

[slim 1,533]

the implication of your words was loud and clear.

If you want to talk about implications, maybe you could tell us why you agreed with a poster who violated TOS?

But to be accurate you were actually given a general discharge under honorable conditions. When you say it like you did up there ^^^- you are making it sound like you were given an honorable discharge, which you were not.

I didn't make it sound like anything. I stated the facts of my discharge. I was discharged under honorable conditions.

The poster who brought this into the fray insinuated that my misconduct discredited my military service. Obviously, it didn't.

Reading comprehension problems? Maybe. It's just you SAY so much and to use Alan's terminology use weasle words,

See above. There was nothing weasle words about my post.

and I see you are bitter about not getting BTZ....Sorry you blew it.

Speaking of blowing it.... why do you think so many females get BTZ?

I've never seen any hard facts on the number of females that get BTZ but one has to ask why such a disproportionate number end up with that free stripe.

[The_Dude 1,142]

If you want to talk about implications, maybe you could tell us why you agreed with a poster who violated TOS?

Slim, you must be new to these forums. You profess to know the TOS, yet you breach it right there in that post, soliciting a TOS violations. Tsk tsk.

[slim 1,533]

Slim, you must be new to these forums. You profess to know the TOS, yet you breach it right there in that post, soliciting a TOS violations. Tsk tsk.

Where'd I say I know the TOS? I said you're not entitled to violate the TOS.

And by your post... you're acknowledging you violated TOS because it would be impossible for me to solicit a TOS violation by asking you a question about your post unless it quoted a TOS violation.

[nane1104 146]

Love it !!!

Hope the audience lets go of their bone (in the non US sense) and gets back to some real smut!

What we need is the Dutchy to tell us how John Boehner's name is pronounced in German. It sure aint Bayner

oh and while she is at it - the Koch brothers in Wisconsin too - even better - it aint coke

MSNBC are missing a glorious feast of smut if they went there

Come on Knufflebeest and tell us !

It's NOT pronounced like a certain male part in a certain condition, sorry to disappoint

[tmma 467]

If you want to talk about implications, maybe you could tell us why you agreed with a poster who violated TOS?

I didn't make it sound like anything. I stated the facts of my discharge. I was discharged under honorable conditions.

The poster who brought this into the fray insinuated that my misconduct discredited my military service. Obviously, it didn't.

See above. There was nothing weasle words about my post.

Speaking of blowing it.... why do you think so many females get BTZ?

I've never seen any hard facts on the number of females that get BTZ but one has to ask why such a disproportionate number end up with that free stripe.

Lets not fool ourselves here. A General discharge under honorable conditions is given to folks whose service does not warrant an ' honorable' discharge. There had to have been circumstances according to your chain of command that warranted the manner of discharge you got & you know, you could have got that GENERAL DISCHARGE ( under honorable conditions) changed to 'honorable' after getting out of the AF......but you had that little run in w/the law, didn't you?...pity, that...

And it may have been a freebie stripe in your AFSC, but not mine.

[Kathryn41 3,205]

A number of comments violating TOS have been removed along with a number of posts quoting the violations. The misogyny, stereotyping, personal attacks and derailment of this thread are all inappropriate. The topic under discussion is a woman who believes her pregnancy should have been diagnosed when she enlisted for military service -not whether women should enlist, not whether men get pregnant, nor any of the other variety of topics that have been discussed rather than the article.

So, discuss the article and if you can't I will be happy to end your participation or close the thread.

[Captain Oates 911]

better let it continue on thread

Edited August 31, 2011 by Alan the Red

[keysjangle 145]

not whether men get pregnant

is it the 25+ hours i've gone without sleep or is that reaaaaaaaaaaallyy funny