The on going effort of Homosexuals, reaching out to children.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Well what exactly do you mean by pro-gay stuff? Criticising folks who base their opinions out of fear and anger is hardly irrational.

Why? Most of you are pro-gay just because it makes you feel good about yourselves. You accuse anyone who disagrees with you of being latent homos. That's not based on rational thinking either.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

According to the pro ** crowd on here, anyone that finds ** sexuality vulgar and disgusting is a closet **.

Well when you seem obsessed by the act of two men having buttsex, and using this as the reason for your dislike there would seem to be a subtext there. Who spends their days wondering about the specifics of the sexual acts of gay men? I know I don't...

[The_Dude 1,142]

Fighting words are not protected in certain contexts. On a message board, they are.

What you find laughable, I find ironic for you to find laughable.

You are absurd Sofiyya. I thought you "live in the real world".

Why? Most of you are pro-gay just because it makes you feel good about yourselves. You accuse anyone who disagrees with you of being latent homos. That's not based on rational thinking either.

Further evidence to support the point made in the previous post.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I find smoking to be vulgar and disgusting.

You must be a closet smoker.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Why? Most of you are pro-gay just because it makes you feel good about yourselves. You accuse anyone who disagrees with you of being latent homos. That's not based on rational thinking either.

At the end if the day, I don't spend a great deal of time thinking about gay rights. I do wonder why some people here appear to obsessed over the mechanics of male gay sex, but not of say female gay sex which they apparently find erotic (unless they are "bull dykes"). As I say, I see a subtext there.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

You are absurd Sofiyya. I thought you "live in the real world".

If I said the same about you, would you believe it?

Further evidence to support the point made in the previous post.

Is this how the difference between the rational argument and the irrational argument is determined?

[The_Dude 1,142]

If I said the same about you, would you believe it?

Is this how the difference between the rational argument and the irrational argument is determined?

Maybe in your mind it is....

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Well when you seem obsessed by the act of two men having buttsex, and using this as the reason for your dislike there would seem to be a subtext there. Who spends their days wondering about the specifics of the sexual acts of gay men? I know I don't...

Maybe you should. If you're not thinking about something you're in support of, what are you basing your support on?

Maybe in your mind it is....

Not really. Frankly, the pro-gay side needs better arguments as much as Kip does.

[The_Dude 1,142]

Maybe you should. If you're not thinking about something you're in support of, what are you basing your support on?

Not really. Frankly, the pro-gay side needs better arguments as much as Kip does.

So now gay people need to justify their existence, their desire for equal rights? .

Edited August 11, 2011 by Rob & Mel

[Sofiyya 1,687]

So now gay people need to justify their existence, their desire for equal rights? .

Apparently so.

[_Simpson_ 250]

You must be a closet smoker.

I'm a Muslim terrorist.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I have thought about it and I have an opinion. The issue doesn't occupy my every waking thought.

That said kip and Danno, the posters you are defending by proxy apparently feel that homosexuality represents some critical threat to society. However, what has never been made clear is the nature of this supposed threat. Do you by any chance know what it might be?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I'm a Muslim terrorist.

FBI notified.

I have thought about it and I have an opinion. The issue doesn't occupy my every waking thought.

That said kip and Danno, the posters you are defending by proxy apparently feel that homosexuality represents some critical threat to society. However, what has never been made clear is the nature of this supposed threat. Do you by any chance know what it might be?

They're social traditionalists and don't like being forced to consider non-traditional morals and practices to be normal and acceptable.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

You must be a closet smoker.

Not any more. I have been reformed. Nobody protests more than a former smoker.

Edited August 11, 2011 by Crusty Old Perv

[The_Dude 1,142]

They're social traditionalists and don't like being forced to consider non-traditional morals and practices to be normal and acceptable.

Is that the new PC word for bigot? I find it absurd that a religious morality is being used to justify denying American citizens civil rights.