Proof of god

[danae 0]

Ahhh atheism - the path to intolerance.

HA!! Are you kidding me? Have you not read all of the intolerant arguments between people who believe 'their' god is the real one? oh but of course you have- you are usually one of those people.

Yeah, we're WAY intolerant as opposed to say, YOU who turns your nose up at the mere mention of God. Now THAT is tolerance. You atheist liberals who point and laugh at the religious, you're the epitome of tolerance.

I don't claim to be open-minded. The path to heaven is straight and narrow, as the Bible says. But liberals - you guys claim to be tolerant and open-minded of EVERYONE and EVERYTHING. What a load of #######.

Erm who actually said I was a 'liberal'? That is just your assumption- 'oh she's atheist and loves animals, lets put her in the liberal category'. Sure I have some liberal point of views, but not on everything.

Therefore I never claimed to be tolerant of EVERYONE and EVERYTHING. Am I tolerant of child abuse? No. Am I tolerant of animal abuse? No. Am I tolerant of murderers? No. Am I tolerant of religion? No not really. The reason? Because it is that very thing that causes prejudice, war, hatred, selfishness, self-absorbancy, speciesism, (and before you say it, yes that is a word), and many many other world problems.

You are all so concerned with the 'next life' that you forget to do right in the one youve got.

[incanada1234 0]

Erm who actually said I was a 'liberal'? That is just your assumption- 'oh she's atheist and loves animals, lets put her in the liberal category'. Sure I have some liberal point of views, but not on everything.

Can you name me some issues you're conservative on? Really, I'm curious.

Therefore I never claimed to be tolerant of EVERYONE and EVERYTHING. Am I tolerant of child abuse? No. Am I tolerant of animal abuse? No. Am I tolerant of murderers? No. Am I tolerant of religion? No not really. The reason? Because it is that very thing that causes prejudice, war, hatred, selfishness, self-absorbancy, speciesism, (and before you say it, yes that is a word), and many many other world problems.

You are all so concerned with the 'next life' that you forget to do right in the one youve got.

Wow, I didn't realize that only atheists are non-prejudice, anti-war, loving, selfless, and not responsible for any of the world's problems. Thanks for educating me! Your way of thinking is so twisted, there's no reason to even TRY to discuss anything with you.

Edited September 16, 2006 by incanada1234

[danae 0]

Erm who actually said I was a 'liberal'? That is just your assumption- 'oh she's atheist and loves animals, lets put her in the liberal category'. Sure I have some liberal point of views, but not on everything.

Can you name me some issues you're conservative on? Really, I'm curious.

Therefore I never claimed to be tolerant of EVERYONE and EVERYTHING. Am I tolerant of child abuse? No. Am I tolerant of animal abuse? No. Am I tolerant of murderers? No. Am I tolerant of religion? No not really. The reason? Because it is that very thing that causes prejudice, war, hatred, selfishness, self-absorbancy, speciesism, (and before you say it, yes that is a word), and many many other world problems.

You are all so concerned with the 'next life' that you forget to do right in the one youve got.

Wow, I didn't realize that only atheists are non-prejudice, anti-war, loving, selfless, and not responsible for any of the world's problems. Thanks for educating me! Your way of thinking is so twisted, there's no reason to even TRY to discuss anything with you.

Ditto- byeeeeeeee

[incanada1234 0]

Can you name me some issues you're conservative on? Really, I'm curious.

byeeeeeeee

Why am I not surprised?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Being "anti-war" and opposed to increasing the power of the executive branch, is in fact conservative, technically speaking. But it really depends on your definition of conservative - as apparently a lot of people can't form a conception as to what is 'liberal' or 'conservative' without relying on partisan politics to define it for them.

[rasmussen 0]

Being "anti-war" and opposed to increasing the power of the executive branch, is in fact conservative, technically speaking. But it really depends on your definition of conservative - as apparently a lot of people can't form a conception as to what is 'liberal' or 'conservative' without relying on partisan politics to define it for them.

Exactly-just like you can have a fascist athiest.

By definition, a fascist promotes the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population based upon superficial qualities or belief systems-for example your attack of believers would fall as a fascist comment.

[Veiled Princess 1]

RE: Cain and Abel, I once had a christian friend who had a theory... she firmly believed that Earth is not the only planet on which God placed people. Her theory was that God brought some women from another planet to marry them. ... interesting theory but I've never heard it before her...

aha! i always thought women were aliens!

Gives a whole new meaning to men are from mars women from venus

[dalegg 143]

So for anyone who has a wife who refuses to, uh "eat a bannana", make sure she watches and pays attention to the selling points:

"Notice how gracefully it sits over the human hand.

It has a point at the top for ease of entry,

just the right shape for the human mouth,

chewy easy to digest

and it's even curved toward the face to make the whole process so much easier"

Although I cannot guarantee this other quote:

"contents don't squirt in your face"

[Mirorgate 0]

So for anyone who has a wife who refuses to, uh "eat a bannana", make sure she watches and pays attention to the selling points:

"Notice how gracefully it sits over the human hand.

It has a point at the top for ease of entry,

just the right shape for the human mouth,

chewy easy to digest

and it's even curved toward the face to make the whole process so much easier"

Although I cannot guarantee this other quote:

"contents don't squirt in your face"

So it was really a sex-ed video in disguise. cle-ver

[Jenn! 918]

So it was really a sex-ed video in disguise. cle-ver

Anything having to do with bananas is always a sexual reference.

[Mirorgate 0]

So it was really a sex-ed video in disguise. cle-ver

Anything having to do with bananas is always a sexual reference.

"Today we shall demonstrate the proper way to apply this condom to this banana"

"Why? is it contagious?"

actually got me kicked outa sex-ed class for that.

[Jenn! 918]

So it was really a sex-ed video in disguise. cle-ver

Anything having to do with bananas is always a sexual reference.

"Today we shall demonstrate the proper way to apply this condom to this banana"

"Why? is it contagious?"

actually got me kicked outa sex-ed class for that.

Bad boy!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Being "anti-war" and opposed to increasing the power of the executive branch, is in fact conservative, technically speaking. But it really depends on your definition of conservative - as apparently a lot of people can't form a conception as to what is 'liberal' or 'conservative' without relying on partisan politics to define it for them.

Exactly-just like you can have a fascist athiest.

By definition, a fascist promotes the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population based upon superficial qualities or belief systems-for example your attack of believers would fall as a fascist comment.

I must have missed that.