Jump to content

226 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Disagree - winners of DV lottery in majority cases do not have any immediate family in the US and DV is their only way to get in. They have to prove appropriate education levels before they are issued the visa, and often times have more than the highschool education required. Not the case with the family based visas.

I understand your point. However, what is more important keeping a nuclear family together or education level? For me it is the family. How sad that some children have to do without one of their parents for YEARS while they wait on their number to come up.

Posted

I understand your point. However, what is more important keeping a nuclear family together or education level? For me it is the family. How sad that some children have to do without one of their parents for YEARS while they wait on their number to come up.

I'm sorry, but no. These are law mandated 55,000 visas (5000 goes for NACARA - Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act) and you don't get to re-allocate just because nuclear family should be kept together. All 50,000 are used up in each fiscal year and nothing is re-distributed to other categories as this is specifically for DV. We're talking about people who have sufficient or above required level of education (bachelors, masters and even doctorate degrees) and English speaking skills who find jobs pretty much on landing in the US.

On the other hand, I know people who brought family members who end up on means tested benefits within a month of arriving, speak no English and don't even care to learn it, let alone seek gainful employment.

ROC 2009
Naturalization 2010

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted

For those who have not, please read the article that Rika60607 posted earlier. I think there are some very valid ideas here. What do you all think of his propsals?

http://www.cis.org/marriagefraud

Also, the article was written by a CO and has some very interesting stories in it.

It's good article and at least it comes from somebody with enough frame of reference to the applicable issues to have many valid points. I don't agree with some of his recommendations but many are very good. Unfortunately, most of the either good or IMO bad recommendations are likely to be implemented anytime soon.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Posted

It's good article and at least it comes from somebody with enough frame of reference to the applicable issues to have many valid points. I don't agree with some of his recommendations but many are very good. Unfortunately, most of the either good or IMO bad recommendations are likely unlikely to be implemented anytime soon.

fixed for you.

ROC 2009
Naturalization 2010

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted

fixed for you.

good.gif

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Posted

jenkatx I thought this thread was about Fraud?????????? please tell me if i am wrong

How is getting rid of the DV Lottery going to help? it will just add more positions for fraudulent marriages. if there was a way of reducing the fraud, surely this would make more places available to the married couples that deserve them.

Posted

jenkatx I thought this thread was about Fraud?????????? please tell me if i am wrong

How is getting rid of the DV Lottery going to help? it will just add more positions for fraudulent marriages. if there was a way of reducing the fraud, surely this would make more places available to the married couples that deserve them.

Your right I got off topic, sorry!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted

Maybe if real couples had the right to seek compensation if they are wrongfully denied. Nothing make the governement pay more attention than having to pay for their mistakes.

This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Cyprus
Timeline
Posted

OnMyWayID, I diagree with you on the 4 out of 5. Be it 1 out of 10 or 3 out of 10 or whatever, yes I would agree to a lie detector test if it was read by an outside entity, not a CO with an agenda. COs have lied and I do not trust a warped CO. Many are doing the best they can and are fair, some aren't. We don't know the ratio and to speculate is not a venue to debate from. My petition was not returned, we are currently in AP, a process I don't mind to undergo in a reasonable time frame, I don't yet consider myself a victim of returned petitions but understand clearly the hell couples go through whose petitions were returned.

I don't want the government doing me any favors "saving me" by returning my case because according to your numbers 4 out of 5 have a potential to be fraud. I am responsible and accountable for my actions and choices and analysis of personal dynamics and don't need anyone to do me such favors, neither will I cry and whine to the government about it later. But you will hear me banging on Mr. Gut Feel's door demanding factual evidence. Mr. Gut Feel also clearly has no answer to the question....why the gut feel ?! None. Mr. Gut Feel needs to get busy analysing facts and evidence brought to him to proof a genuine relationship, instead of replying .....am not reading all that,it's too much.

Spoiler

 

I-129F Sent : 3-31-2014, NOA2: 4-6-2014

NVC Received : some dinkelsberry yehoo in the house of clingons send our petition to the wrong consulate.

Consulate Received : July 30,2014 Transfer to right embassy complete.

Interview Date : Oct 22, 2014

Interview Result : AP , requesting another PC (not expired) and certified divorce decree (was submitted)Stokes interview via phone for petitioner 4 hrs after interview.

Oct 23 email notification visa approved.
Visa Received : Nov. 3 , 2014 VISA IN HAND.

US Entry : Nov. 21, 2014

Marriage : Dec 27, 2014

AOS send : May 12, 2015, received May 14, 2015 USPS priority

Email &text : May 18, 2015, check cashed May 19,2015, return receipt May 21, 2015 stamped USCIS Lockbox, NOA1 (3x) May 22,2015

Biometrics : June 1, 2015 letter received for appointment June 8, 2015, successful walk-in June 1, 2015

RFE : June 12, 2015 for income not meeting guideline. Income does ( ! ) exceed guideline.

RFE response : June 26, 2015 returned with a boat load full of financial evidence.

UPDATE: July 5, 2015 updated on all 3 cases, RFE received June 30, 2015.

Service request : Aug 12, 2015, letter received that it will be processed within 90 days from receipt of RFE.

UPDATE: Aug 24, 2015, EAD card being produced/ordered. ( 102 days from AOS receipt day and 55 days from RFE response received.) Thank you Jesus !

Emails : Aug 24, 2015, EAD approved, EAD card ordered.

I-797 EAD/AP approval notice received : Aug 27, 2015

EAD/AP combo card mailed : Aug 27, 2015, EAD/AP combo card received: Aug 31, 2015

Renewal application send for EAD/AP : May 31,2016 (AOS pending over 1 year). Received June 2, 2016,Notice date June7, 2016, emails,texts, NOA1 hard copy

Service request for pending AOS April 21, 2016, case not assigned yet.
Service request for pending AOS June 14, 2016, tier 2 said performing background checks.
Expedite request for EAD/AP Aug 3, 2016, Aug10 notification >request was received, assigned, completed. RFE letter requesting evidence for expedite, docs faxed Aug18

*Service request for I-485 Aug 3, 2016, Aug11 notification> request was assigned. Service request Dec 2, 2016.
AOS Interview letter received Aug 12, 2016

AOS Interview September 21, 2016.

Second Biometrics appointment letters received for EAD and AOS on Aug 15, 2016 for Aug 17 ( 2 day notice).

Second Biometrics completed Aug 17, 2016

Third Biometrics appointment letter received Aug 19, 2016 for Sept. 1, 2016. WTH ?!

EAD/AP (renewal) approval Aug 22, 2016, NOA2 received Aug 25, 2016

Renewal EAD in production notification text and online, expedite successful 4 days after RFE request response was faxed, Aug25mailed,Aug29received.

Sept. 21 Interview, 2 hour interview, we were separated and asked about 50 questions each for an hour each. IO was firm but professional, some smiles.
Several service requests made, contacted Senator and Ombudsman. Background checks still pending.
July 21, 2017 HOME VISIT.  Went well. Topic thread in AOS forum.
Waiting to skip ROC and get 10 yr GC due to over 2 year while pending AOS
AOS APPROVED Oct. 4, 2017 * Green card in hand Oct 13, 2017 !!!!!

First K1 denied after 16 month of AP. Refiled. We are a couple since 2009. Not a sprint but a matter of endurance.

 

Posted

Couldn't disagree more with your stance. If you want to bring someone over, you must be willing to be accountable for that person. What's cohabitation going to do? Allow the person to stay for a whole year?

We've all seen it a thousand times....couple with red flags and the USC is screaming bloody murder that the gov't is 'STANDING IN THE WAY OF MY RIGHT TO PURSUE HAPPINESS!' then when the scam comes to light, they mistakenly believe it's the gov'ts job to deport their spouse asap.

How to stop fraud? Not gonna happen. Until people stop being so pie-in-the-sky and removing the rose colored glasses, until they understand their SO's country and societal norms, and until they stop really scrutinizing the red flags.

So yeah, it's like salmon swimming upstream.

I think that you are sadly right on many of these points. Particularly knowing the culture of our loved one. It shocks me how some of us have taken no time to research and understand were our SO is from. Not everyone fits into the societal norm but it is a good starting place. At the least it will give one the right questions to ask. On that note a lot of the duty to detect fraud is on us as the petitioner.

I do however believe it is the responsibility of the government to send back someone who is later found out to be fraudulent. On the petitioners dime if required even.

OnMyWayID, I diagree with you on the 4 out of 5. Be it 1 out of 10 or 3 out of 10 or whatever, yes I would agree to a lie detector test if it was read by an outside entity, not a CO with an agenda. COs have lied and I do not trust a warped CO. Many are doing the best they can and are fair, some aren't. We don't know the ratio and to speculate is not a venue to debate from. My petition was not returned, we are currently in AP, a process I don't mind to undergo in a reasonable time frame, I don't yet consider myself a victim of returned petitions but understand clearly the hell couples go through whose petitions were returned.

I don't want the government doing me any favors "saving me" by returning my case because according to your numbers 4 out of 5 have a potential to be fraud. I am responsible and accountable for my actions and choices and analysis of personal dynamics and don't need anyone to do me such favors, neither will I cry and whine to the government about it later. But you will hear me banging on Mr. Gut Feel's door demanding factual evidence. Mr. Gut Feel also clearly has no answer to the question....why the gut feel ?! None. Mr. Gut Feel needs to get busy analysing facts and evidence brought to him to proof a genuine relationship, instead of replying .....am not reading all that,it's too much.

Seconded.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

OnMyWayID, I disagree with you on the 4 out of 5. Be it 1 out of 10 or 3 out of 10 or whatever, yes I would agree to a lie detector test if it was read by an outside entity, not a CO with an agenda. COs have lied and I do not trust a warped CO. Many are doing the best they can and are fair, some aren't. We don't know the ratio and to speculate is not a venue to debate from. My petition was not returned, we are currently in AP, a process I don't mind to undergo in a reasonable time frame, I don't yet consider myself a victim of returned petitions but understand clearly the hell couples go through whose petitions were returned.

I don't want the government doing me any favors "saving me" by returning my case because according to your numbers 4 out of 5 have a potential to be fraud. I am responsible and accountable for my actions and choices and analysis of personal dynamics and don't need anyone to do me such favors, neither will I cry and whine to the government about it later. But you will hear me banging on Mr. Gut Feel's door demanding factual evidence. Mr. Gut Feel also clearly has no answer to the question....why the gut feel ?! None. Mr. Gut Feel needs to get busy analyzing facts and evidence brought to him to proof a genuine relationship, instead of replying .....am not reading all that,it's too much.

We can go round and round on this forever.... we will just have to agree to disagree..

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Maybe if real couples had the right to seek compensation if they are wrongfully denied. Nothing make the governement pay more attention than having to pay for their mistakes.

Why do you want ME to pay for government mistakes? Hint: The "government" has NO money until they take it from somebody else. I am SOMEBODY else and so is everybody you know and don't, love, like, dislike hate or find comical who lives in the USA or is a US Citizen. PLEASE, immigration is a fee for services proposition. You cannot punish the government without punishing all its people including yourself.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
Maybe if real couples had the right to seek compensation if they are wrongfully denied. Nothing make the governement pay more attention than having to pay for their mistakes.
Agree with pushbrk on the compensation part, but the idea of being able to drag some unaccountable COs back to the U.S. in chains for "abuse of a U.S. citizen" has some appeal, if there were a legal avenue therefor. Sadly, the consulates are almost completely untouchable.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted

Many CO's act as gods because they know there is almost nothing that can be done to them no matter how outlandish their decisions. If they were accountable for their decisions they should be more sane in what they do ( or if they are costing the government too much in lost legal actions they would be reassigned to trash collection ) People that don't have experience in having to work an extra year to bring their SO to the country don't care about the pain this causes they worry about the dollars it costs ( it would be less than a penny per citizen probably ) If we all had the same free pass to bring a bed toy our childrens age visa common from some cultures we wouldn't have this topic going on.

This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted

Many CO's act as gods because they know there is almost nothing that can be done to them no matter how outlandish their decisions. If they were accountable for their decisions they should be more sane in what they do ( or if they are costing the government too much in lost legal actions they would be reassigned to trash collection ) People that don't have experience in having to work an extra year to bring their SO to the country don't care about the pain this causes they worry about the dollars it costs ( it would be less than a penny per citizen probably ) If we all had the same free pass to bring a bed toy our childrens age visa common from some cultures we wouldn't have this topic going on.

:thumbs:

NigeriaorBust, you are attempting to prove a point, which continuously is being overlooked and ignored. The CO is being allowed to continue to act as "GOD" and rely on his gut feeling, and is being praised for having this complex!

Ultimately, what is being said here is why should everyone pay for an equal opportunity and treatment for all, if they don't directly benefit from these changes!

Also, I love how assumptions are being made about those who have "not been issued" visas. What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? Did we have a judgment day and I missed it! :rofl:

We can continue to agree to disagree, but the saddest thing is the problem continues. How do we solve this injustice people???

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...