Arctic scientist under investigation

[luckytxn 2,265]

Can you provide examples?

Already have. I posted every major GW study that everyone has touted as proof of GW and how they were shown to be wrong under scrutiny. Want me to repost them?

[Zero Sum 305]

Go for it!

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Already have. I posted every major GW study that everyone has touted as proof of GW and how they were shown to be wrong under scrutiny. Want me to repost them?

If you would. I looked through this thread for instance and saw none, only opinion pieces by journalists. In the other thread that resurrected, I only saw one which discussed temperature feedback, there too were mostly opinion pieces. Maybe you could post them in the newest thread of DFH's as a central location.

This may mean finding the original study brought up in a given article.

[Zero Sum 305]

And having him realize that he needs to choose his actual scientific articles more carefully. Or at the least, not pick articles that contradict the bias he says it proves.

[luckytxn 2,265]

If you would. I looked through this thread for instance and saw none, only opinion pieces by journalists. In the other thread that resurrected, I only saw one which discussed temperature feedback, there too were mostly opinion pieces. Maybe you could post them in the newest thread of DFH's as a central location.

This may mean finding the original study brought up in a given article.

All the articles were posted that showed every major GW study or research conclusion that was highly touted by the GW zealots. Now I have done this 3 times now and will keep this thread and the other one and repost later when I am done. Not one major GW scare study/research has withstood scrutiny. Morons can claim they are wrong and just pieces by non GW crowd but the pieces were made to bring out the other scientists scrutiny. Of course the zealots are going to keep their head in teh sand and cower.

I will repeat. If the study or article is in favor of GW it is a masterpiece. If it refutes it is a hack piece.

[Zero Sum 305]

Hopeless.

I did ask you for your opinion. Still chicken? All you showed ad nauseam was inconclusive 'evidence' that goes nowhere in terms of proving anything, if not just your ignorance of the science involved.

[luckytxn 2,265]

Hopeless.

I did ask you for your opinion. Still chicken? All you showed ad nauseam was inconclusive 'evidence' that goes nowhere in terms of proving anything, if not just your ignorance of the science involved.

As usual nothing of substance. I put effort in showing the studies and research conclusions were shown to be not just wrong but actually manipulated and faked and all you got is............nothing.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

All the articles were posted that showed every major GW study or research conclusion that was highly touted by the GW zealots. Now I have done this 3 times now and will keep this thread and the other one and repost later when I am done. Not one major GW scare study/research has withstood scrutiny. Morons can claim they are wrong and just pieces by non GW crowd but the pieces were made to bring out the other scientists scrutiny. Of course the zealots are going to keep their head in teh sand and cower.

I will repeat. If the study or article is in favor of GW it is a masterpiece. If it refutes it is a hack piece.

Thats what i'm interested in.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Just like there are some people that will never believe humans have walked on the moon, or that we evolved from apes, there are those who just can't seem to grasp the science of Global Warming, but such denialism requires embracing a conspiracy theory that is so fantastical that it defies logic and reason. Such denialism is irrelevant in the bigger picture. The world is responding and trying to adapt to the changes of GW, with or without those who choose to stick the heads in the sand.

[luckytxn 2,265]

Just like there are some people that will never believe humans have walked on the moon, or that we evolved from apes, there are those who just can't seem to grasp the science of Global Warming, but such denialism requires embracing a conspiracy theory that is so fantastical that it defies logic and reason. Such denialism is irrelevant in the bigger picture. The world is responding and trying to adapt to the changes of GW, with or without those who choose to stick the heads in the sand.

GW is an unproven theory. Theory is not a science yet. You and other sheep want us to pretty much dismantle our society on an unproven theory. Now I am all for looking into this theory more but from now on we need total openness and no more fraud. All research and studies must withstand all peer reviews. As the emails showed plainly there is to be no more deceit or dishonesty. Any science that has come into being has had to go through this process and GW to move from a theory to being a science has to do so also.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Just like there are some people that will never believe humans have walked on the moon, or that we evolved from apes, there are those who just can't seem to grasp the science of Global Warming, but such denialism requires embracing a conspiracy theory that is so fantastical that it defies logic and reason. Such denialism is irrelevant in the bigger picture. The world is responding and trying to adapt to the changes of GW, with or without those who choose to stick the heads in the sand.

Why do you hate Buddhists?

“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.” (Hindu Prince Gautama Siddharta, the founder of Buddhism, 563-483 B.C.)

Edited August 25, 2011 by Crusty Old Perv

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

"Who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?" Marx,

Chico

Edited August 25, 2011 by Crusty Old Perv

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

GW is an unproven theory. Theory is not a science yet. You and other sheep want us to pretty much dismantle our society on an unproven theory. Now I am all for looking into this theory more but from now on we need total openness and no more fraud. All research and studies must withstand all peer reviews. As the emails showed plainly there is to be no more deceit or dishonesty. Any science that has come into being has had to go through this process and GW to move from a theory to being a science has to do so also.

To be a theory it must be verified, otherwise its still a hypothesis.

Edited August 25, 2011 by Sousuke

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

To be a theory it must be verified, otherwise its still a hypothesis.

Perhaps theory is too strong a word.

A theory is a well-established principle that has been developed to explain some aspect of the natural world. A theory arises from repeated observation and testing and incorporates facts, laws, predictions, and tested hypotheses that are widely accepted.

• A theory predicts events in general terms, while a hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a specified set of circumstances.
  
• A theory has been extensively tested and is generally accepted, while a hypothesis is a speculative guess that has yet to be tested.
  

[luckytxn 2,265]

Perhaps theory is too strong a word.

I was being a bit generous and throw the sheep a bone. I actually think it is an interesting hypotheses and maybe should be looked at but we need Al Gore to hand back his Oscar and Nobel prize.