Jump to content
Susie4

Real Love, but Real Problems?

 Share

71 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline

On the bright side, if it's true that she can live on a cruise ship for $7/day as his family member - it's cheaper than any rent and they could be together. Not sure where it leaves her daughter though.

LOL I work for a bank and I have some older retired members that actually sold thier houses and live on a cruise ship... its like living in a retirement home of sorts except you can travel and see new places, they food is included in the cost, so no cooking needed... I didnt even know ppl did this until recently but it does happen.

As long as they have valid proof of the relationship being genuine even if she left her husband to marry him it wont matter....as long as her address at the time she files is different from her ex husband then it should be ok... still a lot of red flags but that would be a biggie if she wasnt livng somehwere else at the time she filed. There was recently someone who was denied at the interview because her divorce was final but she was still listed on the deed to her house with her ex so the embassy thought she was still married. They were able to get another interview but it took about another 8 or 9 months to get it.

And of cos the issue of income is a huge obstacle but she can still overcome this... either by finding a job she can do with her health issues or getting a good co sponsor.

Good luck

10/02/2010 Nikah/Marriage in Karachi
USCIS JOURNEY
11/10/2010 -Sent
03/24/2011 i 130 approved!!!
NVC JOURNEY
03/30/2011 NVC received case-04/07/2011 NVC Case Number Assigned
05/03/2011 CASE COMPLETE- In Que for INTERVIEW!!-05/17/2011 Received interview letter and info via email
EMBASSY JOURNEY
05/20/2011 Medical Appt/passed
06/15/2011 Interview result AP
06/21/2011 Submitted requested docs..under review
07/25/2011 CO called did phone interview result: PENDING MANDATORY AP/CO told us they have to do namechecks

03/07/2013 Case returned to USCIS waiting for NOIR/reaffirmation

04/18/2013 USCIS received case for review

08/19/2013 Received NOIR to respond by 9/18/2013

9/9/2013 Responded to NOIR/USCIS received documents awaiting response

9/20/2013 USCIS reaffirmed sent to embassy

1/04/14 Case opened for review

8/31/15 Interview- no questions visa approved on the spot

9/8/15 visa status issued

9/10/15 visa received

9/19/15 POE Charlotte

p9WGm4.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Turkey
Timeline

As far as the crew visa I have some insight into that since my husband works as an officer on a ship. His options are sign off the ship and leave the country. Crew members can't adjust status here. They are only allowed to come to the us to work on the ship and then leave. (I just spoke to my husband and he said that even if you have a C1/B1 visa, it is still difficult to switch it from a crew visa even though he was successful.) Crew visas don't let anyone do much and be wary of someone that says that their crew visa will allow them to stay for a while after they sign off, it is not true.

My husband changed contracts so he could work on a ship that stopped in the US. While we were going through the spousal visa he had to interview with customs (which is common) and even there they did not hold back punches. He said that it was the toughest interview he has ever had to do as long as he has been working on board and he has been all over the place.

I have heard so stories of crew members jumping ship, but they are illegal and you can't adjust status by leaving the ship. Crew visa allows you to come here, work on the ship and leave as soon as your contract is up. If you want to come back, get a tourist visa or choose another contract that comes here.

As far as evidence, traveling with her bf is good. For evidence we just pulled off the ship's log which had me listed as a passenger. She will definitely need a cosponsor because this process is not cheap by far.

Everyone on here has been spot on with their assessments and I would try to tell your friend about everything that you have read here. PM me if you have any more questions regarding what a crew visa entitles him to do.

Wedding: 7/10/2010

I-130 Sent: 10/08/2010

NOA 1: 10/20/2010

Touched: 10/26/2010

NOA2: 2/10/2011

NVC: 3/6/2011 approx.

No I-864, DS-230 Notification NVC says download files

Emailed Agent form: Response Confirming Change Arrived the Next Day

Mailed I-864 Package: 4/2/2011, Arrived 4/4/2011

DS-230 Received: 4/19/2011

RFE: 5/3/2011, emailed documents same day, email confirmation 5/4/2011

NVC Case Complete: 5/20/2011 (approx. called NVC and they said it was complete so don't know exact date)

Email with Instructions: 5/27/2011

Interview scheduled: 7/14/2011

Consulate had to reschedule, new interview 7/20/2011

APPROVED 7/20/2011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
she goes to court [...] On those documents, she does indeed have listed a different separation date than is true.
This disturbed me from the start. She's committing a crime.
She keeps telling me that they are trying to find him a job
She's contemplating the commission of ANOTHER crime.
once immigration starts to look at her background information [...] it might be obvious to them that the divorce was obtained through fraud and that the matter could come back to haunt her in her quest to have her new love living on U.S. soil.
Not just haunt the relationship, but herself, too -- the penalties for lying on immigration forms are 5 years's imprisonment or a fine of $250,000.

If USCIS doesn't flag this, any consul with half a brain at even the easiest embassy would absolutely barbecue them.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Romania
Timeline

Now I know that he has both a crewman's visa (the C1/D) and a B2 visa, I presume he is here at the moment on the B2 visa... but I am not sure how that process works. She is now officially, legally divorced and in a state with no cooling off period. She is legally free to marry, immediately.

Is it possible to apply for AOS with the B2? Even though I suspect there may be at least some problem there because he entered the US with what appears to me to be the intent to stay and not as a true "tourist". Is that a problem that is real or I'm I overthinking that one?

Between two of them they have seem to have NO idea what they are doing. And neither of them seems to be capable of thinking clearly. I asked her today if she knew that he couldn't legally work here and she says "all he has to have is a letter from an employer that they want to hire him and he can get what he needs." When I asked where she got that information she said "just based on how he did it in the past, with the cruise line". I have done some reading and I don't think that is anywhere close to what is necessary for him to be legally employed.

And another question...can someone give me a rough idea of at what point in the process he CAN be legally employed? Does that happen when you start the process somehow or only after you are "approved" to be a resident?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Romania
Timeline

This disturbed me from the start. She's committing a crime.She's contemplating the commission of ANOTHER crime.Not just haunt the relationship, but herself, too -- the penalties for lying on immigration forms are 5 years's imprisonment or a fine of $250,000.

If USCIS doesn't flag this, any consul with half a brain at even the easiest embassy would absolutely barbecue them.

She won't be lying on the immigration form, just did on the divorce paperwork. I feel like the state won't bother with her the divorce paperwork because it has now been granted and filed. I just included that bit of information because I was worried about how far immigration officers go in research if they suspect something isn't right and I feel like, at least on the surface, this LOOKS like a case where someone may be trying to commit fraud. When, really, it's just two people ignorant and oblivious to what they have to do to make things legal. They just assume if they get married, he gets to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is with all the 3rd person talk?

I find it hard to believe this is just a friend. Some answers coming too quickly.

If this is just a friend why then can they not come here and ask the questions themselves? It is their situation and being so would always know more answers then anyone else.

This is one extremely odd situation. Screams fraud to me with a person who seems to have a history of doing so already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Romania
Timeline

What is with all the 3rd person talk?

I find it hard to believe this is just a friend. Some answers coming too quickly.

If this is just a friend why then can they not come here and ask the questions themselves? It is their situation and being so would always know more answers then anyone else.

This is one extremely odd situation. Screams fraud to me with a person who seems to have a history of doing so already.

My friend doesn't have access to a computer and is too caught up in her own lovestory to see that her situation might be something that will be difficult to make legal. She's not thinking clearly, and I am trying to think a little for her and help prepare her for what she thinks is going to be a piece of cake. She honestly doesn't know enough to know that there is any more to this than she just hast to get him a job offer and get a letter form someone saying they have a job fof him and then "voila! he can stay". I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way, so I've been trying to figure out how it DOES work so I can tell her what she needs to know.

When I have a question for her I just ask her and she tells me what she knows, or what he's able to tell her. And you'd be surprised how much she does NOT know about her own situation because she trusts what he says completely and she doesn't have a CLUE yet how difficult a process this can be for him to work here (I am a busines owner, and I know there is a good bit I have to do to verify someone's legal status to work before I can hire them). He doesn't know very much because he's not American and has spent very little time in our country. While he has a working English vocabulary, I think there is a lot he doesn't understand either because of the language barrier or because of his frame of reference due to the differences in how he's used to seeing things work (his mother, for instance, works in Italy despite being a Romanian citizen but I think rules are very different for members of EU countries than they are in the U.S.) They both seem very uninformed about the process and I'm just trying to help her gain perspective because I'm afraid the generosity of friends who have given them a place to live temporarily won't last forever and I think she will end up on the street. I don't want to see that for my friend and I think she just has herself in a nearly impossible situation -- especially because she doesn't even have the money they need to pay fees to file certain applications. I want to help her avoid making mis-steps due to her ignorant bliss that will end up making her situation more difficult than it already is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Y'know, you could telephone ICE and ask to speak with a visa expert (get a name, rank, & location). An ICE agent like that would be able to tell you exactly what the requirements and limitations are, and what the penalties are for violations. The information might get your friend to wake up.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Even if he is currently on B2 visa, they still will need to find a co-sponsor for adjustment of status. And no, he can't just take a job while he is in the US. He has to either find a job, leave and get a work visa (not really feasible after marriage to a USC) or he has to wait for EAD card to be sent to him (once they apply for AOS) or he has to leave and come back with CR-1 and be eligible for work almost immediately (he has to get SSN).

However, it is not illegal for him to look for a job. If he is looking for an offer letter from a company, then he is not trying to get a cash/ under table kind of job. So he is not trying to break the law, he's just not well informed about how it works.

As far as intent goes, it is, just like separation date, a grey area. As she was married at the time when he entered the US, he can argue that he could not possibly plan on marrying and staying.

If they find a co-sponsor for I864, they just might pull it off.

They just assume if they get married, he gets to stay.

CR-1 Timeline

March'07 NOA1 date, case transferred to CSC

June'07 NOA2 per USCIS website!

Waiver I-751 timeline

July'09 Check cashed.

Jan'10 10 year GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Romania
Timeline

Y'know, you could telephone ICE and ask to speak with a visa expert (get a name, rank, & location). An ICE agent like that would be able to tell you exactly what the requirements and limitations are, and what the penalties are for violations. The information might get your friend to wake up.

That is an excellent idea that hadn't even ocurred to me. I may do that today -- but with her in the room so she can also hear it for herself. Thank you for that suggestion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

You seem to think that their relationship is genuine and you seem to wish your friend the best and willing to go quite far with your involvement... yet it also looks like you are trying to find a way to convince her that it will never work.

Why?

Is it because you say their relationship is genuine, but you really think it is not?

That is an excellent idea that hadn't even ocurred to me. I may do that today -- but with her in the room so she can also hear it for herself. Thank you for that suggestion!

CR-1 Timeline

March'07 NOA1 date, case transferred to CSC

June'07 NOA2 per USCIS website!

Waiver I-751 timeline

July'09 Check cashed.

Jan'10 10 year GC received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...