The EPA is arguably the most economically beneficial of government entities. If you like breathing, that is.

[Zero Sum 305]

credibility is lost come page 36.

Explain how this is skepticism and not denialism. I bet you know more than the actual scientists too right?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

credibility is lost come page 36.

That's okay. The chart is presented on page 3 long before the loss of credibility occurs 33 pages later.

[slim 1,525]

So let me get this straight, all I have to do to gain credibility on VJ is post a chart that I made?

[Zero Sum 305]

So let me get this straight, all I have to do to gain credibility on VJ is post a chart that I made?

Read the link.

[slim 1,525]

Read the link.

Posting links works too?

[Zero Sum 305]

Posting links works too?

Its a PDF. Maybe reading the posts in the thread would help.

[slim 1,525]

Maybe if you'd think about what posts mean you'd see that I'm suggesting someone who makes a point can't be the same someone that creates the proof.

[Zero Sum 305]

Maybe if you'd think about what posts mean you'd see that I'm suggesting someone who makes a point can't be the same someone that creates the proof.

That's why there is a reliance on external sources, if you cared to look at the link and the information hopefully discussed.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Maybe if you'd think about what posts mean you'd see that I'm suggesting someone who makes a point can't be the same someone that creates the proof.

I merely provided the source for the chart and the document that answered the other questions Paul had. Not sure what you think I created aside from a bit of confusion on your end.

Edited June 29, 2011 by Mr. Big Dog