Jump to content
Enigma11561

IMPORTANT- BIA RULES K2S DO NOT AGE OUT

 Share

16 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Please read this. The BIA has finally ruled that K2s do NOT age out as of June 23. 2011.

http://immdaily.com/pdfs/Verovkin%2012-21-07.pdf

The PDF you've linked to is the 2007 Verovkin decision which was issued by a district court in California. Where is the BIA decision you alluded to?

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Belarus
Timeline

Jim, having a hard time with the link so I did a copy and paste of the beginning of the decision.Self explanatory. Will try to fix later.

Cite as 25 I&N Dec. 541 (BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3719

541

Matter of Hieu Trung LE, Respondent

Decided June 23, 2011

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board of Immigration Appeals

A derivative child of a nonimmigrant fiancé(e) visa holder under section 101(a)(15)(K)(iii)

of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(K)(iii) (2006), is not

ineligible for adjustment of status simply by virtue of having turned 21 after admission to the

United States on a K-2 nonimmigrant visa.

FOR RESPONDENT: Lisa H. York, Esquire, Denver, Colorado

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Leila Cronfel, Assistant

Chief Counsel

BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, PAULEY, and GREER, Board Members.

GREER, Board Member:

In this case, we address issues pertaining to the child of a nonimmigrant

fiancée visa holder who obtained admission as a derivative of his mother’s

fiancée status. The respondent, a K-2 visa holder, sought to adjust his status

to that of a lawful permanent resident, but he had turned 21 prior to the

adjudication of his application for adjustment of status by the Immigration

Judge. We conclude that to adjust status based on a K-2 visa, an alien

derivative child must establish that he or she was under 21 years of age at the

time of admission to the United States. The respondent’s appeal will

be sustained and the record will be remanded to the Immigration Judge

to allow the respondent to renew his application for adjustment of status

pursuant to sections 245(a) and (d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,

8 U.S.C. §§ 1255(a) and (d) (2006).

I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline

The new determination would be made at the time of admission, as per "prior law"

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/287035-calling-all-k-2-aosers-past-and-present/page__view__findpost__p__4741809

玉林,桂 resident
Feb 23, 2005 ........ Mailed I-129F to TSC . . . . . . . . .March 8th ............. P1 from CSC
April 11 ................. P2 from CSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 25 ................ NVC sends packet to GUZ
June 22 ................ P3 received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov 22 ................. PASSED Interview
Dec 2 ................... Made it! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec 16 .................. Married
May 23, 2006 ..... TDL, EAD, AP received. . . . . . . . . June 16, 2006 ........ AOS interview - wait for FBI bkgrnd check
Apr 19, 2007 .... EAD # 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct 7, 2008 ......... 10-year green card
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - K2 (son) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dec 2 ..................... AOS/EAD filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec 17 ................... 21st birthday
Jan 4, 2007 .......... transferred to CSC . . . . . . . . . . . Feb 6, 2007 ............ transferred to MSC
Feb 23 .................... EAD card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Apr 16 .................... AOS denied (over 21)
Jul 26 .................... Master Calendar hearing . . . . . . Nov 15 ...................... Removal hearing
Jan 29, 2008 ........ Voluntary departure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Belarus
Timeline

I typed this in personally rather than copy and paste. If this does not work try to google bia decision3719.It came up as the first entry.

http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol25/3719.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

I typed this in personally rather than copy and paste. If this does not work try to google bia decision3719.It came up as the first entry.

http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol25/3719.pdf

Thanks! I saw walserr's post in the K2 thread. This is good news. :thumbs:

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Great News! Some people have questioned the need and validity of the K visa over the CR visa in the past. This is one reason to choose the K-1 as it includes children over age 18 but under age 21. Now that this has been cleared up with a very logical decision this should stop the non-sensical rush people get into to adjust status.

There is no particular deadline for a K-1 to adjust status and a K-2 cannot adjust status until the K-1 has (or simultaneously) so how was it ever logical to apply this artificial deadline to K-2s? :wacko: It never did make any sense. It now appears that the "deadline" is that the 21st birthday does not occur before the petition is approved. At the very least, the issuance of the visa. Makes sense. Given that the processing times vary widely (my petition was approved in 58 days vs. 6-7 months for some people) why should a K-2 be denied because the Service Center is running slow? I would have preferred the ruling to state that the cut-off should be the filing date of the I-129f. I guess that will be next.

For you, Enigma, great news and congratulations! I am sure it is a big relief for you and your wife. Thanks for updating us.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline

Great News! Some people have questioned the need and validity of the K visa over the CR visa in the past. This is one reason to choose the K-1 as it includes children over age 18 but under age 21. Now that this has been cleared up with a very logical decision this should stop the non-sensical rush people get into to adjust status.

There is no particular deadline for a K-1 to adjust status and a K-2 cannot adjust status until the K-1 has (or simultaneously) so how was it ever logical to apply this artificial deadline to K-2s? :wacko: It never did make any sense. It now appears that the "deadline" is that the 21st birthday does not occur before the petition is approved. At the very least, the issuance of the visa. Makes sense. Given that the processing times vary widely (my petition was approved in 58 days vs. 6-7 months for some people) why should a K-2 be denied because the Service Center is running slow? I would have preferred the ruling to state that the cut-off should be the filing date of the I-129f. I guess that will be next.

For you, Enigma, great news and congratulations! I am sure it is a big relief for you and your wife. Thanks for updating us.

No - the age used is the age at the time of entry. This is also the deadline to use the visa - the K-2 visa holder must be under 21 at the POE.

The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) still does not apply.

玉林,桂 resident
Feb 23, 2005 ........ Mailed I-129F to TSC . . . . . . . . .March 8th ............. P1 from CSC
April 11 ................. P2 from CSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 25 ................ NVC sends packet to GUZ
June 22 ................ P3 received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov 22 ................. PASSED Interview
Dec 2 ................... Made it! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec 16 .................. Married
May 23, 2006 ..... TDL, EAD, AP received. . . . . . . . . June 16, 2006 ........ AOS interview - wait for FBI bkgrnd check
Apr 19, 2007 .... EAD # 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct 7, 2008 ......... 10-year green card
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - K2 (son) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dec 2 ..................... AOS/EAD filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec 17 ................... 21st birthday
Jan 4, 2007 .......... transferred to CSC . . . . . . . . . . . Feb 6, 2007 ............ transferred to MSC
Feb 23 .................... EAD card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Apr 16 .................... AOS denied (over 21)
Jul 26 .................... Master Calendar hearing . . . . . . Nov 15 ...................... Removal hearing
Jan 29, 2008 ........ Voluntary departure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline

Doh! Delete me

Edited by RandyW

玉林,桂 resident
Feb 23, 2005 ........ Mailed I-129F to TSC . . . . . . . . .March 8th ............. P1 from CSC
April 11 ................. P2 from CSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .April 25 ................ NVC sends packet to GUZ
June 22 ................ P3 received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nov 22 ................. PASSED Interview
Dec 2 ................... Made it! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec 16 .................. Married
May 23, 2006 ..... TDL, EAD, AP received. . . . . . . . . June 16, 2006 ........ AOS interview - wait for FBI bkgrnd check
Apr 19, 2007 .... EAD # 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oct 7, 2008 ......... 10-year green card
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - K2 (son) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dec 2 ..................... AOS/EAD filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dec 17 ................... 21st birthday
Jan 4, 2007 .......... transferred to CSC . . . . . . . . . . . Feb 6, 2007 ............ transferred to MSC
Feb 23 .................... EAD card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Apr 16 .................... AOS denied (over 21)
Jul 26 .................... Master Calendar hearing . . . . . . Nov 15 ...................... Removal hearing
Jan 29, 2008 ........ Voluntary departure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

No - the age used is the age at the time of entry. This is also the deadline to use the visa - the K-2 visa holder must be under 21 at the POE.

The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) still does not apply.

This is correct. According to the BIA decision, the child's age when they are admitted to the US using the K2 visa now determines their eligibility to adjust status. This makes it relatively clear cut - if the child is under 21 when they enter the US, then they're eligible to adjust status, provided that they adjust as a K2. There is still one way it could blow up for a K2 - if the K1 marries after the 90 day window has expired then the K1 is still eligible to adjust as an immediate relative of a US citizen, but a K2 who is over 18 years of age would not be eligible as an immediate relative and would not be able to adjust status.

So, this decision effectively moves the line. A K2 who is over 18 years of age no longer needs to complete AOS before they are 21. They only need to enter the US before they are 21.

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Belarus
Timeline

This is correct. According to the BIA decision, the child's age when they are admitted to the US using the K2 visa now determines their eligibility to adjust status. This makes it relatively clear cut - if the child is under 21 when they enter the US, then they're eligible to adjust status, provided that they adjust as a K2. There is still one way it could blow up for a K2 - if the K1 marries after the 90 day window has expired then the K1 is still eligible to adjust as an immediate relative of a US citizen, but a K2 who is over 18 years of age would not be eligible as an immediate relative and would not be able to adjust status.

So, this decision effectively moves the line. A K2 who is over 18 years of age no longer needs to complete AOS before they are 21. They only need to enter the US before they are 21.

As a follow up, I am happy to report that my step son got his NOA today offering congratulations of being approved for his green card. I guess that BIA ruling is actually working. I hope it helps all the others in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Congratulations, si man! :)

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...