Jump to content
one...two...tree

Why the Best Male Doesn't Always Win

 Share

8 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

NORMAN, Okla.—Survival of the fittest really boils down to reproduction of the fittest. If an animal can survive long enough to pass on its genes to a new generation, it has won out in the evolutionary competition.

So, understandably, many animals put a lot of effort into attracting the attention of the opposite sex, explained Alison Pischedda, of University of California Santa Barbara, showing pictures of sparring male elephants, a colorful peacock and Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino from MTV's Jersey Shore.

But winning the female is only part of the game in many species even more promiscuous than those featured on cable TV. "We often assume mating success was the primary marker of male fitness," Pischedda noted. But in many animals, a female might mate with several males before producing a brood of offspring with mixed paternity. This so-called post-copulatory sexual selection is "kind of a big deal" in the biological sciences, Pischedda said here June 21 at the Evolution 2011 annual conference.

The post-deed weeding can happen either via sperm competition or rejection by the female's body of some mates' goods—a process known as cryptic female choice.

Although both strategies have been described previously, Pischedda noted, there was still one "pretty fundamental question" that had yet to be answered: How much do these processes influence the number of offspring a male actually ends up siring?

So Pischedda set out to figure out just how much post-copulatory sexual selection matters in terms of the number of offspring a male ends up fathering. "I thought it would be a piece of cake—turns out not so much," she said of the project. Rather than try to assess animal populations in the wild, Pischedda and her colleagues used fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) in a controlled laboratory experiment, studying the genetic patterns of some 1,800 breeding flies in their "very promiscuous mating system," she explained.

The team found that the number of females that a male mated with was not the only determinant of how many offspring they sired. In fact, post-copulatory factors explained about 27 percent of the males' success rate.

The data also revealed that the number of offspring that a male ended up fathering from a female's batch of eggs had more to do with how recently he had mated with her than with his overall genetic quality. The last male to mate with a female fruit fly before she lays her eggs fathered an average of about 79 percent of the brood even though "those males are not necessarily the best in the population," Pischedda said.

So after factoring that steep statistic in to the analysis, mating order explained about a quarter of a male's reproductive success and number of offspring, whereas any cryptic or other internal sperm selection was responsible for about 2 percent of sexual success. Although that factor is small, Pischedda pointed out that it has "a statistically significant impact" in figuring out fitness, and "should really be included" in future work, she noted.

But just playing the numbers, males that get to mate with the most females might have the best odds of being the last one in, and thereby fathering the majority of the offspring—at least in the fruit fly world. Mating dynamics on Jersey Shore might need further study.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=why-the-best-male-doesnt-always-win-2011-06-22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

it seems the scientists are now telling us sloppy seconds are best.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

#1 in your heart, #38 on your scorecard, si man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

it seems the scientists are now telling us sloppy seconds are best.

Ha ha! If you want kids. If you don't, then you better find a basketball team to pull a train on her after you are done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Ha ha! If you want kids. If you don't, then you better find a basketball team to pull a train on her after you are done.
One of the best that I ever heard was "Your mother swims after troop-ships," si man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

One of the best that I ever heard was "Your mother swims after troop-ships," si man.

Apparently she was chasing after the Big Red One. I bet that she also wears combat boots, USMC man!

IR5

2007-07-27 – Case complete at NVC waiting on the world or at least MTL.

2007-12-19 - INTERVIEW AT MTL, SPLIT DECISION.

2007-12-24-Mom's I-551 arrives, Pop's still in purgatory (AP)

2008-03-11-AP all done, Pop is approved!!!!

tumblr_lme0c1CoS21qe0eclo1_r6_500.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

post-copulatory sexual selection ? oh my - something new to worry about.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...