A twist in Obama's health care law

[Vi-Jay 218]

An "accident" which provides coverage to more Americans and which - surprise, surprise - Republicans immediately want to "fix".

After initially downplaying any concern, the Obama administration said late Tuesday it would look for a fix.

Story unfolding.

Edited June 21, 2011 by Vi-Jay

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

which kinda says something about life in prison, eh?

or about the sad state of our healthcare system

[Zero Sum 305]

or about the sad state of our healthcare system

Get your overreaching government hands off of my healthcare system. Its awesome the way it is.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Get your overreaching government hands off of my healthcare system. Its awesome the way it is.

[SuperDuper! 230]

Who is "they" \ ? Your sense of humor cracks me up.

Someone has an obsession with pronouns....

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I thought it was the goal of socialized healthcare to give healthcare to everyone?

What is the big surprise?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

See post #6.

Seems the administration is seeking a "fix" too.

A fix for what? How? Less coverage for less people?

I about give up on this. Has anyone else figured out that the FEDERAL government can't do this? We will have single payer coverage for everyone in Vermont in three years, before this Federal mess goes into affect and a waiver from having to play this game (or pay for it)

Y'all have fun!

[mawilson 2,133]

I thought it was the goal of socialized healthcare to give healthcare to everyone?

What is the big surprise?

My point exactly. Whether it was an oversight or not, the goal is the same - make sure everyone has access to medical care.

[Vi-Jay 218]

My point exactly. Whether it was an oversight or not, the goal is the same - make sure everyone has access to medical care.

"The fact that this is being discovered now tells you, what else is baked into this law?"

I can't believe that Gary was the only one that came close to getting the point of the article.

While others are behaving like this guy..,

[rika60607 215]

Don't be silly. Point of the article is easy to get, but there is no obligation to agree with the agenda pushed by this article, is there?

I can't believe that Gary was the only one that came close to getting the point of the article.

While others are behaving like this guy..,

[The Dude 206]

I can't believe that Gary was the only one that came close to getting the point of the article.

While others are behaving like this guy..,

[Vi-Jay 218]

I'm surprised you had 1 form left to share. Thanks but I'm not butthurt and if I was, I know the "powers that be" are backlogged with your many reports. Will be many moons before they are finished processing yours.

Edited June 22, 2011 by Vi-Jay

[The Dude 206]

I'm surprised you had 1 form left to share. Thanks but I'm not butthurt and if I was, I know the "powers that be" are backlogged with your many reports. Will be many moons before they are finished processing yours.

So you getting upset because people don't agree with your point of view isn't getting butthurt?

[Vi-Jay 218]

So you getting upset because people don't agree with your point of view isn't getting butthurt?

Are you that tender sweetheart?

I'm not upset if someone disagree with my POV. I'm a married man. I'm used to it.

I'm not blind. They got the point of the article. They dodged it. Some don't like to see that OM is an incompetent administrator surrounded by incompetent rookies and snake oil salesmen/women.

It hurts their feelers.

[The Dude 206]

Are you that tender sweetheart?

I'm not upset if someone disagree with my POV. I'm a married man. I'm used to it.

I'm not blind. They got the point of the article. They dodged it. Some don't like to see that OM is an incompetent administrator surrounded by incompetent rookies and snake oil salesmen/women.

It hurts their feelers.

Nonetheless, you got butthurt over the internet.