FDA Strikes Again With Power Wave of BS Labels on Cigarettes

[Obama 2012 1,714]

idiocy.

Stupid labels by a loving and caring government.

Propaganda machine 101! Gotta love it.

-------

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/06/21/cigarette.labels/index.html

Washington (CNN) -- Nine new graphic cigarette warning labels were unveiled Tuesday by the Food and Drug Administration, part of the agency's sweeping new powers to regulate tobacco and tobacco products.

Cigarette packages will now carry one vivid color image and one of these warnings about the consequences of smoking: "Cigarettes are addictive"; "Tobacco smoke can harm your children"; "Cigarettes cause fatal lung disease"; "Cigarettes cause cancer"; "Cigarettes cause strokes and heart disease"; "Smoking during pregnancy can harm your baby"; "Smoking can kill you"; "Tobacco smoke causes fatal lung disease in nonsmokers"; and "Quitting smoking now greatly reduces serious risks to your health."

The warnings will cover the upper portion of the pack both front and back. Fifty percent of the package must be covered. The warnings must also cover at least 20% of a cigarette ad.

Small ads less than 12 inches don't have to cover as much, but must still have a warning. Each warning will also have a phone number -- 1-800-QUIT-NOW -- that smokers can call to get help if they want to quit.

See all the new labels

"President Obama is committed to protecting our nation's children and the American people from the dangers of tobacco use. These labels are frank, honest and powerful depictions of the health risks of smoking and they will help," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in an FDA statement. "These labels will encourage smokers to quit and prevent children from smoking. President Obama wants to make tobacco-related death and disease part of the nation's past, and not our future."

The new packaging and ads must be in place by September 2012.

The move is a result of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA), which mandates cigarette packs and advertisements have larger and "more visible graphic health warnings" as part of an effort to educate the public about the health risks associated with smoking.

"The Tobacco Control Act requires FDA to provide current and potential smokers with clear and truthful information about the risks of smoking -- these warnings do that," Commissioner of Food and Drugs Margaret A. Hamburg said in the FDA statement.

Thomas Glynn, director of cancer science and trends for the the American Cancer Society, said the old labels have been virtually invisible because they're small and have been around for so long. He said people have become immune and don't really "see" them anymore, but the new labels will be hard to ignore and will help focus attention on the problem.

"It's the first change we've had in 25 years. This is going to be a very important element in the tobacco control tool box, but it's not a panacea," Glynn said. "For smokers, it's a new and very visible reminder that smoking can harm them, harm people around them, including children. For nonsmokers, it's a reminder that smokers need their help and concern as far as quitting. The labels are not just for smokers, the labels are for anyone interested in public health."

Glynn says about 20% of the population still smokes, a number that has been pretty steady over the past five years. He hopes the new labels will jump start a downward trend and re-ignite discussions about tobacco use.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 443,000 people in the U.S. die from smoking or exposure to secondhand smoke annually and more than 8 million are living with a disease that's directly tied to smoking. The CDC says smoking is responsible for 90% of all lung cancer deaths in men and 80% in women. It estimates smoking causes 90% of all chronic obstructive lung disease deaths such as bronchitis and emphysema.

But both R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, the two largest tobacco companies in the U.S., responded in January to the required warnings in letters to the FDA.

R.J. Reynolds, maker of some the country's best-selling brands like Camel, Kool, Winston and Salem, said the new requirements violate the First and Fifth Amendments. The company said, in part, "The anti-smoking message is not intended to provide information that smokers and potential smokers can consider rationally in weighing the risks and perceived benefits from smoking. Rather, it plainly conveys -- through graphic images and designs intended to elicit loathing, disgust, and repulsion -- the Government's viewpoint that the risks associated with smoking cigarettes outweigh the pleasure that smokers derive from them and, therefore, that no one should use these lawful products."

R.J. Reynolds said "by confiscating" the top 50% of the package and 20% of the ads, the government is not warning consumers about smoking risks -- it is telling consumers, "Don't buy or use this product." The company is asking the FDA to withdraw the new rule, which it says is flawed, and issue a new one.

Philip Morris, the country's largest tobacco company, supported the FSPTCA. But in its letter, the company also raised questions about the constitutionality of the labels.

"Any government requirement that compels a private entity to carry a message not of its own choosing raises constitutional concerns ... To the extent that FDA were to select warnings based on their ability to evoke negative or cognitive reactions --not their ability to objectively inform consumers about the health risks of smoking -- such warnings would not pass constitutional muster," the company wrote.

It said the sheer size of the warnings violates the First Amendment.

The tobacco companies are footing the bill for the new labels. But Glynn said with $95 billion a year being spent on tobacco-related disease and health problems, it's money well spent.

"It's not an expensive intervention," Glynn said. "The cost of putting the pictures on is at the expense of the tobacco industry; there is no cost to the government. So this is not the government spending money, and yet what we are going to gain from it is less death and less disease -- and that's going to save the government money."

With this new move, the United States will be the 40th country to have picture warnings on our cigarette packs, making the country compliant with the World Health Organization's global treaty on tobacco. Under the treaty, 35% of a cigarette pack must have warnings and pictures.

The treaty has already been ratified by 173 of 192 member nations of the United Nations. The United States is one of 19 countries that has not ratified the treaty, but with the new labels, will be compliant.

Countries such as Canada, Brazil and Australia have long been leaders in tobacco control and have had very graphic art on their packaging for years.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Keep smoking Paul, it's actually good for you.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Smoking costs the government - i.e. all of us - a lot of money. Nothing wrong with taking steps to curb the use of this product.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Keep smoking Paul, it's actually good for you.

I don't smoke. I choose not to. See how that works?

I choose whether or not I want to go into a smoking establishment. See how that work?

Choice without government interference. Amazing isn't it?

It's erroneous to say that "smoking is addictive" and "Smoking kills" in blanket terms. If a company uses blanket terms and doesn't put an asterik next to it, they get in trouble. However the hypocrisy in Government is allowed? It's bull, all of it.

For some people it's addictive, yes. For some people it brings out the cancer cells in their body, yes. Does it happen to everyone? Does it happen all the time? No.

For every person you point out to me that's died or is addicted, I can point out one who smokes every day and is 80 years old and in decent health. I can point out social smokers who choose when and when not to smoke.

I'm all about education on POSSIBLE effects, but not for blanket BS ads that aren't 100% truthful.

[Zero Sum 305]

Smoking contains nicotine. Nicotine is addictive. End of story. Unless, of course- you are immune to nicotine.

[Darnell 8,478]

i likw the warning labels in singapore, printed on each cigarette pack.

One shows the cancer, another shows the teeth and gums, there were 10 that rotated .

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Smoking contains nicotine. Nicotine is addictive. End of story. Unless, of course- you are immune to nicotine.

It's not that simple. Nicotine triggers addictive genes is some individuals, but it's not some blanket drug that magically makes you addicted to things.

Addiction is a part of genetics and a mental symptom as well. It's not something that is just caused by a magic drug.

As I said, for every person you know that is addicted to cigarettes, alcohol, etc. I can point out people that aren't and use the products on an infrequent basis, who even used it on a more frequent basis and who had no problems whatsoever with just stopping instantly. Or who did it for a couple of weeks, said meh.. and moved along.

You cannot blanket this one, just as you can't with many things out there.

[Zero Sum 305]

Here we go again with another fallacious opinion of what statistical significance means.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I don't smoke. I choose not to. See how that works?

I choose whether or not I want to go into a smoking establishment. See how that work?

Choice without government interference. Amazing isn't it?

And your choice is impacted how by the label mandates? Do you now have less of a choice or a less educated choice or what? I don't understand what the impact of this move is to you?

[Zero Sum 305]

It's not that simple. Nicotine triggers addictive genes is some individuals, but it's not some blanket drug that magically makes you addicted to things.

Addiction is a part of genetics and a mental symptom as well. It's not something that is just caused by a magic drug.

As I said, for every person you know that is addicted to cigarettes, alcohol, etc. I can point out people that aren't and use the products on an infrequent basis, who even used it on a more frequent basis and who had no problems whatsoever with just stopping instantly. Or who did it for a couple of weeks, said meh.. and moved along.

You cannot blanket this one, just as you can't with many things out there.

Really?

And your choice is impacted how by the label mandates? Do you now have less of a choice or a less educated choice or what? I don't understand what the impact of this move is to you?

The big bad government is lying to people that the choice to smoke may cause cancer. Obviously.

[SMOKE 1,426]

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in an FDA statement. "These labels will encourage smokers to quit and prevent children from smoking. President Obama wants to make tobacco-related death and disease part of the nation's past, and not our future."

so why doesn't he lead by example & quit? did he give himself a waiver?

[Zero Sum 305]

so why doesn't he lead by example & quit? did he give himself a waiver?

I'd say he made his choice. A bad one- usually associated with addicted behavior.

Is this a mandate he can waive himself from? I don't think so.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

The big bad government is lying to people that the choice to smoke may cause cancer. Obviously.

The big bad government is lying to us every day. One of the available choices is to ignore those lies. More lies, more choices. Paul should be happy.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I'd say he made his choice. A bad one- usually associated with addicted behavior.

Is this a mandate he can waive himself from? I don't think so.

The real question is whether he'll waive the label requirement for the packs he intends to smoke himself. The investigators of the World Nut Daily and other true investigative publications are all over than one already. I expect the shocking news to hit the shelves soon.

[Zero Sum 305]

The real question is whether he'll waive the label requirement for the packs he intends to smoke himself. The investigators of the World Nut Daily and other true investigative publications are all over than one already. I expect the shocking news to hit the shelves soon.