When refs make bad calls

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

That's a rather generous amount of spin on it.

Generally speaking, if someone says bigoted, sexist things, then the reasonable conclusion would be that they are indeed a woman-hating bigot.

I haven't seen a sexist mod on this site yet. Charles and Brad get labeled for being sexist just for the fact they don't cave into a certain VJ crowd who would have us all being politically correct and/or sexually confused on here if they had their way. Charles is about as good as it gets. He does like to start sh*t on here and then kick back and watch the sparks fly, but other than that he's fair and calls it like it is.

[Ban Hammer 13,491]

Well it certainly does makes you wonder why the powers-that-be made this crazy character a moderator.

there must be some sense to it, as you're not one

[natty bumppo 297]

Generally speaking, if someone says bigoted, sexist things, then the reasonable conclusion would be that they are indeed a woman-hating bigot.

why do you hate men?

or ... maybe you're implying that a man is not subjected to "bigoted, sexist things" ...

Edited June 20, 2011 by natty bumppo

[Vi-Jay 218]

This thread could easily be in Site Discussion.

Someone better hurry and post something political.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I haven't seen a sexist mod on this site yet. Charles and Brad get labeled for being sexist just for the fact they don't cave into a certain VJ crowd who would have us all being politically correct and/or sexually confused on here if they had their way. Charles is about as good as it gets. He does like to start sh*t on here and then kick back and watch the sparks fly, but other than that he's fair and calls it like it is.

Well Kip, how can I put this? I think the kindest way to say it is to suggest your judgement maybe at fault somewhat, given that you apparently believe it is perfectly fine to suggest that female VJers who are complaining about sexist commentary on the boards are not getting enough sex.

You can spin that however you want - and I imagine you will say it falls under the umbrella of political correctness and "sexual confusion". The truth is that you like to say these things for effect - because you think it gets under people's skin. On some level it might, but not with me. You simply aren't clever enough to pull it off - or to realise that your defence of Charles does him no favours at all.

[Vi-Jay 218]

political correctness and "sexual confusion".

Problem solved.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

there must be some sense to it, as you're not one

I have no desire to be, but I have made so secret of saying that the decision to give you that responsibility on this site was a gigantic mistake. And I am not the only person who believes this.

The sexism thing (it may have escaped notice but I deliberately didn't explicitly make reference to you on that in this thread - but since you have, I will oblige) is one example - and not simply of the sexual nature of the comments about female politicians, you've done it to several female VJers as well.

Then there's how you react to slightest provocation - and we end up in this bizarre game of oneupmanship. As I said - I was joking about that internet warrior reference, but clearly it is no joke to you...

[Ban Hammer 13,491]

This thread could easily be in Site Discussion.

Someone better hurry and post something political.

there, happy?

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

This thread could easily be in Site Discussion.

Someone better hurry and post something political.

Sarah Palin would make a horrible president, but she has nice boobs. OK...that's political.

Well Kip, how can I put this? I think the kindest way to say it is to suggest your judgement maybe at fault somewhat, given that you apparently believe it is perfectly fine to suggest that female VJers who are complaining about sexist commentary on the boards are not getting enough sex.

You can spin that however you want - and Iimagine you will say it falls under the umbrella of political correctness and "sexual confusion". The truth is that you like to say these things for effect - because you think it gets under people's skin. On some level it might, but not with me. You simply aren't clever enough to pull it off - or to realise that your defence of Charles does him no favours at all.

That crowd never stops...even when certain peeps like myself do. It's like they aren't happy unless their miserable. I mean how many threads do they start down there in the Site Discussion forum complaining about every mod and every RUB peep on this site. They just go on and on and on and on....

Edited June 20, 2011 by Why_Me

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

why do you hate men?

or ... maybe you're implying that a man is not subjected to "bigoted, sexist things" ...

Maybe you've cooked that craziness up in your head.

[Ban Hammer 13,491]

I have no desire to be, but I have made so secret of saying that the decision to give you that responsibility on this site was a gigantic mistake. And I am not the only person who believes this.

oh of course you don't have the desire.

The sexism thing (it may have escaped notice but I deliberately didn't explicitly make reference to you on that in this thread - but since you have, I will oblige) is one example - and not simply of the sexual nature of the comments about female politicians, you've done it to several female VJers as well.

Then there's how you react to slightest provocation - and we end up in this bizarre game of oneupmanship. As I said - I was joking about that internet warrior reference, but clearly it is no joke to you...

who cares? you don't joke about anything. it's not your nature. try again with your damage control.

[Vi-Jay 218]

(See post #36. )

Your post =

Thanks.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Sarah Palin would make a horrible president, but she has nice boobs. OK...that's political.

That crowd never stops...even when certain peeps like myself do. It's like they aren't happy unless their miserable. I mean how many threads do they start down there in the Site Discussion forum complaining about every mod and every RUB peep on this site. They just go on and on and on and on....

Now if they were doing their job and having more sex with their SO, they wouldn't have the time, want and need for that would they now ?

You see Kip, this is your mistake. You seem to think this kind of thing is funny, perhaps you even hope to make people angry with it. The fact of the matter is, it's just lame.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

oh of course you don't have the desire.

who cares? you don't joke about anything. it's not your nature. try again with your damage control.

As I see it YOU should care. After all - you are supposedly part of the moderation team.

Yet the code of conduct that other mods follow doesn't seem to apply to you. I find that curious.

Edited June 20, 2011 by fishdude

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

You see Kip, this is your mistake. You seem to think this kind of thing is funny, perhaps you even hope to make people angry with it. The fact of the matter is, it's just lame.

Let me do a "Vi-jay" as it was someone else who got on my laptop and posted that.