"Assume the Position, Rep. Bachmann"

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Actually, I think it's commendable that you want to defend female politicians from below the belt sexist attacks. I can only presume that you've changed your attitude over the last 3 years.

Sexist remarks are demeaning to women and display misogyny and bigotry. Do you disagree?

[Ban Hammer 13,417]

i'll play your game. do they?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I would think that they do, surely you must do too. Why else would you be suggesting that female politicians running for president get it worse than anyone else?

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

I had the same thought. Then I found all this....

a mean hearted corrupt conniving ######?

White House gives out sex line number.

Is Hillary a hottie?

Send Hillary for OJ's conjugal visits.

As Hillary said to Bill...

If you get an e-mail with "nude photos of Hillary Clinton" in the subject line, do not open it. It might contain nude pictures of Hillary Clinton.

i just wanna see her in the same outfit brittney wore for that video

Only ugly chicks get to be Democrats

i'm sure that will be the first time hillary gave someone wood in several decades

OMG those are classics. The email one about "don't open, it may contain nude pics of Hillary" is gold.

[Ban Hammer 13,417]

I would think that they do, surely you must do too. Why else would you be suggesting that female politicians running for president get it worse than anyone else?

then why ask if you know the answer?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Because it's at odds with your earlier comments. You can't make a string of sexist remarks about a female politician, then turn around and complain that female politicians get it worse than everyone else if you yourself are contributing to the problem. It says either you don't really care about the treatment of female politicians or that you are being hypocritical.

[Ban Hammer 13,417]

Because it's at odds with your earlier comments. You can't make a string of sexist remarks about a female politician, then turn around and complain that female politicians get it worse than everyone else if you yourself are contributing to the problem. It says either you don't really care about the treatment of female politicians or that you are being hypocritical.

and again, it's about me now. how surprising!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I answered your question. Just wondered when you had the change of heart that making sexist comments about female politicians is wrong. What prompted it?

[Ban Hammer 13,417]

nice try, duncan, but i'm not going to play this game with you.

you'll have to troll someone else today.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It's not a game. Either making sexist comments about female politicians (and women in general) is wrong or or isn't.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

It's not a game. Either making sexist comments about female politicians (and women in general) is wrong or or isn't.

Come on, it's not that hard to figure out. It's okay and fun to do it when the female politician happens to be on the left of the spectrum but it's unacceptable when the female is on the opposite side of the spectrum.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Come on, it's not that hard to figure out. It's okay and fun to do it when the female politician happens to be on the left of the spectrum but it's unacceptable when the female is on the opposite side of the spectrum.

Thats certainly the conclusion you're left with

[Ban Hammer 13,417]

Come on, it's not that hard to figure out. It's okay and fun to do it when the female politician happens to be on the left of the spectrum but it's unacceptable when the female is on the opposite side of the spectrum.

given the rants by some about palin and now bachmann, i'd say that point is wrong.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Which begs the question: is it wrong to make sexist remarks about female politicians and women in general?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

given the rants by some about palin and now bachmann, i'd say that point is wrong.

Actually, if 'some' are making similar comments about Palin and Bachmann that you did about Hillary (while objecting to the latter) then the point would be spot on. Surely...