Jump to content

110 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Assume the Position, Representative Bachmann

by John Hayward

You can tell Michele Bachmann had a great debut at the Republican primary debate in New Hampshire last night, because swarms of liberal writers are breaking off from their pursuit of Sarah Palin’s tour bus to dive-bomb her.

Dana Milbank of the Washington Post decided to headline a basically complimentary assessment of Bachmann’s debate performance as “Bachmann assumes the position.” He was riffing on CNN moderator John King’s instruction for the candidates to assume their positions at the lectern, which he turned into a rather tortured metaphor for the entire debate. (Milbank was watching a different debate than the rest of the country if he thinks Newt Gingrich’s position was “a bored college professor.”)

Just try to imagine anyone at a liberal paper headlining a story about one of the 2008 Democrat debates as “Obama assumes the position.”

Milbank also couldn’t resist mentioning how Bachmann was shorter than the other candidates, carping about which camera she was looking into when she gave her response to Barack Obama’s State of the Union address, dragging out a weird liberal obsession with something she said about the abolition of slavery in Iowa six months ago, and demeaning her with the wholly inaccurate designation of “back bencher.” He thinks she did great in the debate, mind you. He just wanted to drop the standard payload of snotty liberal conventional wisdom that makes the Washington Post so boring.

Bachmann got slapped with another round of backhanded compliments from E.J. Dionne of the Post, who generously allowed that “she was at ease and forceful without looking crazy or out-of-control.” Wow, Michele Bachmann got through a whole debate without needing a straitjacket! Stop the presses!

“It’s a sign of how far to the right the Republican Party has moved that she didn’t stand out for her extreme views,” continued Dionne. No, Mr. Dionne, it’s a sign of how far your corrupt and demagogic Democrat Party has dragged America to the left edge of ruin that a simple common-sense defense of capitalism and liberty sounds “extreme” to you. Departing a large, luxuriously appointed ship to clamber into a little wooden boat is a "radical" thing to do, but it's also the right thing to do, when the ocean liner is sinking.

Dionne concludes by speculating that “if President Obama was watching, nothing that happened tonight made him quake in his boots. On the contrary, it was striking that the ideas on offer were largely conservative boilerplate.”

Of course President Obama wasn’t watching. He’s got fundraising to do. That is his sole concern for the remainder of his disastrous first term. Yesterday he was flopping horribly at a Miami arena, where he couldn’t fill a thousand seats at $44 a head. Note to tired lefty hacks like Dionne: you’re not going to be able to dismiss conservative ideas by yawning and claiming they’re all “boilerplate.” Obama is the one America is bored to death of. The vast numbers of unemployed people produced by his policies have lots of time on their hands to be bored.

It’s also funny to hear the answers to a 30-second debate format dismissed as “boilerplate.” How were these folks supposed to cram nuance into their answers? Hold up flash cards covered with telemetry and bar codes?

No one in Bachmann’s camp can be surprised at the kind of attacks coming her way. Much of the media will just scribble her name over “Sarah Palin” on broadsides they have already written. Forensic gynecologist Andrew Sullivan will soon be demanding DNA samples from the children she claims issued from her loins. It’s not just Bachmann’s superficial similarities to Palin that make the attacks so predictable. It’s that she also represents the views, concerns, and aspirations of normal people. Liberals hate the views, concerns, and aspirations of normal people. They require obedience to an agenda designed by superior minds. Bachmann made it clear she aims to misbehave.

After last night’s debate, the Republican primary boiled down to a Rocky IV contest, with Mitt Romney in the Ivan Drago role, while Michele Bachmann is jogging through the snow with a log on her back. She’ll draw more fire in the short term, because the Left will react more viscerally to her. They won’t be able to stop thinking about the positions they want to see her in.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44172

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Well, seems to me that the author has already found the appropriate position for Rep. bachmann to assume - that of a victim. How novel. And I thought she wasn't supposed to be like Sarah...

has the press ever been kind to a female competing for the oval office?

bachmann, palin, hillary, ferraro......

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

Run Bachman run! Too hilarious for words, what to the GOP has become.

B and J K-1 story

  • April 2004 met online
  • July 16, 2006 Met in person on her birthday in United Arab Emirates
  • August 4, 2006 sent certified mail I-129F packet Neb SC
  • August 9, 2006 NOA1
  • August 21, 2006 received NOA1 in mail
  • October 4, 5, 7, 13 & 17 2006 Touches! 50 day address change... Yes Judith is beautiful, quit staring at her passport photo and approve us!!! Shaming works! LOL
  • October 13, 2006 NOA2! November 2, 2006 NOA2? Huh? NVC already processed and sent us on to Abu Dhabi Consulate!
  • February 12, 2007 Abu Dhabi Interview SUCCESS!!! February 14 Visa in hand!
  • March 6, 2007 she is here!
  • MARCH 14, 2007 WE ARE MARRIED!!!
  • May 5, 2007 Sent AOS/EAD packet
  • May 11, 2007 NOA1 AOS/EAD
  • June 7, 2007 Biometrics appointment
  • June 8, 2007 first post biometrics touch, June 11, next touch...
  • August 1, 2007 AOS Interview! APPROVED!! EAD APPROVED TOO...
  • August 6, 2007 EAD card and Welcome Letter received!
  • August 13, 2007 GREEN CARD received!!! 375 days since mailing the I-129F!

    Remove Conditions:

  • May 1, 2009 first day to file
  • May 9, 2009 mailed I-751 to USCIS CS
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...