help plzzzzzzzz (K-1 but 'married' - Morocco)

[moroccogirlny 100]

What's that saying?......people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones?

[san diego 407]

What's that saying?......people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones?

Good one

[I_Am_That_I_Am 46]

K1 = FIANCE/FIANCEE (NOT YET married) . very simple.

I am asking those who are doing fraudulent things to bear in mind that many innocent couples get affected by their actions. The more questionable things you do, the stricter the consul people get, the more elusive the US visa gets. It's just not fair.

[gigi_a 0]

hey guys i need help plz

my sister file k1 and she has interview next week on amreican consula in morocco

so she is scared cause she is married and file k1

i wait the respond thnkx for the help

Is she married to the US citizen with whom she filed the K1 or someone else???

[Golden Gate 530]

Is she married to the US citizen with whom she filed the K1 or someone else???

I was wondering that myself, but I didn't ask it.

[Casprd 167]

This is bad. They need to stop the K-1 now or she is risking a lifetime ban. Even then since the petition has made it to the consulate, the CO's will remember this and getting the CR-1 approved is going to be very difficult.

[KittyPollitt 284]

No wonder people having trouble getting K1/CR1 in Morocco. more than 50% of the threads from Morocco that I read here are some sort of fraud or look like it.

[Lisamarie 79]

Yeah really, he always has some kind of drama-filled comment, and rarely anything useful.

It is possible that they filed a K-1, then decided to marry later while waiting in the process and didn't ask questions or research on what they needed to do, and now that they're at the interview stage they're thinking about it and freaking out about it. There is no way to know until the OP comes back. But it's not necessarily "fraud"....

[souleymon 27]

I just thought she should cancel the appointment.It really has bn a long process ..but then she can save a life ban for a known duration or resetting things to norm.

This is total Misinformation as people do not essentially make research before filing forms.I do hope her mind isnt set up for the appointment and want to risk giving it a shot

[Que Saudade 284]

It isn't fraud unless they go through with the process. No one knows the intentions when they first filed. The proper response now would be to cancel the petition and let the consulate know they got married and have abandoned the K1 and will be filing a CR1.

It would be of interest whether they got married AFTER filing the K1 or before filing the K1. This may be where the problem of proceeding may arise. However, speculation without further information isn't prudent. Keep in mind that the OP isn't the actual petitioner or beneficiary. There is information missing for sure.

[brian and aileen 14]

I read the same problem over and over again and that comes from Morocco! It's like its the same person asking but using a lots of names.

[Robert&Liliya 31]

** Post violating our Terms of Service (TOS) has been removed (and one quoting same). Specific violation:

[Will Not] Condone or instruct, either directly or indirectly, others on how to commit fraudulent or illegal immigration activities in any way, shape, manner or method

If you see this in the thread it may be safe to assume that the “Don't do it” and comments about fraud may have something to do with what has been removed.

[Gosia & Tito 199]

It might just be a problem of bad English with nervousness. Every case is different, and unless all details are posted, not easy to make a determination.

If anything, the government here is not precisely clear and transparent in their forms and instructions, that is why VJ exists. Why would every embassy have a different procedure (aside from wanting to protect and catch fraud)??, it would make things much more easy to digest.

Then there is the well known time disparities across Vermont and California, the RFEs, etc. Even if some things are discretionary by the adjudicator, make it so is more predictable.

And they are not always clear and/or knowledgeable:

Just in the past 2 days, my fiancee was told (by an Embassy employee taking calls for fiancee/immigration visas no less) that the DS230 was a must for a K1. My understanding from the instructions is that is no needed unless you are in an immigrant track, which is confirmed here in VJ by a post.

[Love Eth 14]

K1 = FIANCE/FIANCEE (NOT YET married) . very simple.

I am asking those who are doing fraudulent things to bear in mind that many innocent couples get affected by their actions. The more questionable things you do, the stricter the consul people get, the more elusive the US visa gets. It's just not fair.

I agree on this. Most innocent people are affected by some fraudulent people and their ativites.

Please keep the system CLEAN.

Thanks

Edited June 15, 2011 by Love Eth

[san diego 407]

I read the same problem over and over again and that comes from Morocco! It's like its the same person asking but using a lots of names.

Agreed!