Jump to content

48 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailybeast/20110614/ts_dailybeast/14700_newhampshirerepublican2012presidentialdebaterepublicanextremismondisplay;_ylt=ArN99hxYqmP_7kmbaFdcExXZa7gF;_ylu=X3oDMTVnY2U0dmZiBGFzc2V0A2RhaWx5YmVhc3QvMjAxMTA2MTQvMTQ3MDBfbmV3aGFtcHNoaXJlcmVwdWJsaWNhbjIwMTJwcmVzaWRlbnRpYWxkZWJhdGVyZXB1YmxpY2FuZXh0cmVtaXNtb25kaXNwbGF5BGNjb2RlA29mZmdtcHRvcDUwMHBvb2wEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwM2BHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDaGFzdGhlZ29wbG9z

Has the GOP Lost Its Mind?

Michelle Goldberg – Tue Jun 14, 1:21 am ET

EW YORK – Romney said he’d blow up the world economy over the debt ceiling. Bachmann doesn’t believe in evolution or global warming. And those were the debate’s stars.

Here are things that Republicans suggested eliminating or privatizing in last night’s debate: FEMA, NASA, the EPA, the Federal Labor Relations Board, Medicaid and food stamps. Herman Cain promised not to appoint any Muslims who want to kill Americans to his cabinet. Michele Bachmann supports states rights on gay marriage, but also supports a constitutional amendment outlawing it. Newt Gingrich faults big government for the lamentable absence of manned stations on the moon. Rick Santorum wants to “a system of discipline” to “punish” gay soldiers, which suggests that his problem with pornographic Google results is not likely to abate. Tim Pawlenty views Iraq as “one of the shiniest examples of success in the Middle East.”

In this crowd, Mitt Romney seemed almost statesmanlike, even though he says he’s willing to blow up the world economy by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. At least he admitted that Sharia law will not soon be coming to America, about as brave a concession to reality as we’re likely to see from this field.

At least Romney admitted that Sharia law will not soon be coming to America, about as brave a concession to reality as we’re likely to see from this field.

He and Bachmann were the winners last night. Romney came off as relatively serious and reasonable, and benefited from the fact that Tim Pawlenty wimped out when invited to take on his health care record. Bachmann, who announced her candidacy during the debate, probably gained more from the proceedings than anyone. She was charming, charismatic and far better spoken than Sarah Palin, to whom she’s often compared, has ever been. Of course, she doesn’t believe in evolution or global warming, thinks homosexuality can be cured and warns of a plot to merge the United States with Canada and Mexico, but in today’s Republican Party, none of that is particularly controversial. It’s going to be a long seventeen months.

Edited by Why_Me

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

To be better spoken than Sarah Palin gets you an honorable mention these days? **, my four year old daughter could run for President if all it takes to be considered a viable candidate is to be better spoken than Sarah Palin. Only in America. Seriously, we're so fcuked.

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

To be better spoken than Sarah Palin gets you an honorable mention these days? **, my four year old daughter could run for President if all it takes to be considered a viable candidate is to be better spoken than Sarah Palin. Only in America. Seriously, we're so fcuked.

But can your daughter take on Big Oil and a corrupt state government and win?

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Filed: Timeline
Posted
But can your daughter take on Big Oil and a corrupt state government and win?

Obviously, she doesn't meet some of the constitutional requirements to become President. I don't even have her long form birth certificate but only her certification of live birth from the state of Florida which, given that she was born to immigrant parents from Europe and - co-incidentally - East Africa, would put her at odds with Danno, Charles and the rest of the World Nut Daily crew. She even spent several visits - a few months at a time - in East Africa during her first few years and is bound to spend more time there as she grows up. So, it would be an uphill battle for her seeing how much hate "real" Americans have for fellow - by their definition not-so-real - Americans.

I was simply referring to the quality highlighted for Michele which boiled down to being better spoken than Sarah Palin. My daughter - even at her very young age - has that quality. So it is from that perspective that I am saying that my daughter would be considered a viable candidate in today's GOP. And that should be worrisome to all of us.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Obviously, she doesn't meet some of the constitutional requirements to become President. I don't even have her long form birth certificate but only her certification of live birth from the state of Florida which, given that she was born to immigrant parents from Europe and - co-incidentally - East Africa, would put her at odds with Danno, Charles and the rest of the World Nut Daily crew. She even spent several visits - a few months at a time - in East Africa during her first few years and is bound to spend more time there as she grows up. So, it would be an uphill battle for her seeing how much hate "real" Americans have for fellow - by their definition not-so-real - Americans.

i fail to see what i have to do with that topic - so leave me out of your rants.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Hey, you worship at the altar of the WND. We've been through this in the other thread.

judging people by their links :rolleyes:

here, go apechit over this one too

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/314599-chicago-states-attorney-lets-bad-cops-slide/

:secret: it's a huffington post

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

I was simply referring to the quality highlighted for Michele which boiled down to being better spoken than Sarah Palin. My daughter - even at her very young age - has that quality. So it is from that perspective that I am saying that my daughter would be considered a viable candidate in today's GOP. And that should be worrisome to all of us.

BD-Daughter for President 2032 :dance: :dance: (she'll be >35 then, yeah?)

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
If you don't understand politics, then don't post absurd nonsense like this. You might as well have just done your insipid "si, man" act.
Let's not count Bachmann out so fast, no man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...