the truth about 9/11?

[CarolineM 0]

we're adults, aren't we?

questionable for some...

[mmmbop1976 1]

i am not a islam/muslim hater, the only people i hate are dictators, tyrants, and any person that would try ti take freedom away from others.

having said that, i quick read the article and i do think it supports the thought that the conspiracy theorists are kind of out in left field on this one. but, today is 9/11, a day that we should remember our almost 3000 citizens that were brutally murdered all because they lived in a country that believes in freedom. today is not the day to ponder the what for's and why if's and other conspiracies. so, for your timing of this post i say to you.....

[Saddle Bronc 124]

i am not a islam/muslim hater, the only people i hate are dictators, tyrants, and any person that would try ti take freedom away from others.

having said that, i quick read the article and i do think it supports the thought that the conspiracy theorists are kind of out in left field on this one. but, today is 9/11, a day that we should remember our almost 3000 citizens that were brutally murdered all because they lived in a country that believes in freedom. today is not the day to ponder the what for's and why if's and other conspiracies. so, for your timing of this post i say to you.....

Q: what did Paul C's original post reveal?

A: that Paul C is a chopf#ck!

[type2negative 0]

Q: what did Paul C's original post reveal?

A: that Paul C is a chopf#ck!

I would use "confirmed".

[almaty 19]

Q: what did Paul C's original post reveal?

A: that Paul C is a chopf#ck!

I would use "confirmed".

\

it is never confirmed..the word is "certified"

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Q: what did Paul C's original post reveal?

A: that Paul C is a chopf#ck!

I would use "confirmed".

\

it is never confirmed..the word is "certified"

Either way,

Edited September 11, 2006 by CherryXS

[mybackpages 0]

this article was discussed on "democracy now" this morning........ not 3 months ago

I think it is a very interesting "other" view of what "may" have happened on that terrible day........

how is that callous?

I heard this discussion on Democracy Now this morning. I miss they would have had more time to get into some of the particulars of the debate. I agree it's not callous, but rather respectful to those harmed on this date 5 years ago to have a open dialogue.

[danae 0]

this article was discussed on "democracy now" this morning........ not 3 months ago

I think it is a very interesting "other" view of what "may" have happened on that terrible day........

how is that callous?

I heard this discussion on Democracy Now this morning. I miss they would have had more time to get into some of the particulars of the debate. I agree it's not callous, but rather respectful to those harmed on this date 5 years ago to have a open dialogue.

I agree. And to those who branded this article as 'sick'- Im inclined to think that you skimmed the first paragraph, made your assumptions and posted here without actually reading the whole article. This is indeed a very objective piece.

And if Paul felt this was appropriate to post this today (after all it IS just another day) then he is perfectly within his rights to do so. Its called freedom of speech. To suggest this thread gets closed is just plain ridiculous.

[Ban Hammer 13,340]

I agree. And to those who branded this article as 'sick'- Im inclined to think that you skimmed the first paragraph, made your assumptions and posted here without actually reading the whole article. This is indeed a very objective piece.

And if Paul felt this was appropriate to post this today (after all it IS just another day) then he is perfectly within his rights to do so. Its called freedom of speech. To suggest this thread gets closed is just plain ridiculous.

i'll agree that he has the right to post it, however, posting it today shows a lack of judgement as shown by the outraged replies. tomorrow would have been a better day.

[mmmbop1976 1]

And if Paul felt this was appropriate to post this today (after all it IS just another day) then he is perfectly within his rights to do so. Its called freedom of speech. To suggest this thread gets closed is just plain ridiculous.

i bet if your SO was one of the victims on 9/11 you wouldn't call it "just another day"

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Considering that 9/11 was a completely unprecedented event - no modern skyscraper has suffered that sort of catastrophic damage I'm not sure why there is any need for a conspiracy theory.

It's like coming across a body with a knife its back and suggesting that it was poisoned.

[Ban Hammer 13,340]

Considering that 9/11 was a completely unprecedented event - no modern skyscraper has suffered that sort of catastrophic damage I'm not sure why there is any need for a conspiracy theory.

It's like coming across a body with a knife its back and suggesting that it was poisoned.

omg is it a full moon? i'm agreeing with erekose again!

[type2negative 0]

Considering that 9/11 was a completely unprecedented event - no modern skyscraper has suffered that sort of catastrophic damage I'm not sure why there is any need for a conspiracy theory.

It's like coming across a body with a knife its back and suggesting that it was poisoned.

Tehnically speaking that applies only to the first tower. Second tower was a precendented event.

As for the rest of post -

I'm not sure why there is any need for a conspiracy theory

I have to give but i feel

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Considering that 9/11 was a completely unprecedented event - no modern skyscraper has suffered that sort of catastrophic damage I'm not sure why there is any need for a conspiracy theory.

It's like coming across a body with a knife its back and suggesting that it was poisoned.

Tehnically speaking that applies only to the first tower. Second tower was a precendented event.

As for the rest of post -

I'm not sure why there is any need for a conspiracy theory

I have to give but i feel

Well my friend, its one more opinion than you have

[Twomoles 8]

I founded this article was very interesting and read it with big interest as another opinion and theory about historical events.