Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

A provision in Alabama's immigration law requiring schools to collect citizenship information on undocumented aliens may raise objections from the U.S. Justice Department and is making some education officials uneasy.

The legislation, passed last week, includes a provision that requires public schools to determine the citizenship of students enrolling in the school, either by confirmation of a birth certificate or of documents establishing the citizenship or immigration status of the child.

Sen. Scott Beason, R-Gardendale, one of the sponsors of the bill, said the section is designed to gather information on the number of undocumented aliens in public schools and the price of educating them.

"That is where one of our largest costs come from," he said. "It's part of the cost factor. Are the parents here illegally, and if they were not here at all, would there be a cost?"

The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division said in a May 6 letter to school districts nationwide that "student enrollment practices that may chill or discourage" the enrollment of undocumented aliens, based on their immigration status or their parents', violated federal law.

"The undocumented or non-citizen status of a student (or his or her parent or guardian) is irrelevant to that student's entitlement to an elementary and secondary public education," the letter states.

Louis Fryer, attendance coordinator for Elmore County Public Schools, said asking for papers would effectively discourage student enrollment and create legal issues.

"Once you start asking that question, you get to the point where you're tacitly trying to deny access to school," he said. "Not many people are going to try to enroll students if they are illegal immigrants."

The law, still awaiting the signature of Gov. Robert Bentley, requires school boards to submit citizenship data to the State Board of Education. The State BOE is required to compile that data into an annual report to the Legislature that analyzes the effects or expected effects of the presence of undocumented students on those "who are citizens of the United States residing in Alabama."

The Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that undocumented aliens could not be denied public education based on their immigration status. The case, Plyler v. Doe, involved a Texas law that denied money for the education of undocumented children and a school district that tried to charge children without documentation tuition to attend public school. The court ruled the laws were "directed against children" and violated the 14th Amendment.

Beason said sponsors studied Plyler v. Doe in drafting the legislation and were careful to reflect its requirements.

"This section is specifically designed to know how much the cost is," he said. "I think it's completely within the boundaries."

The Alabama immigration law lists "primary and secondary school education" as one of the public benefits where verification of residency is not required, and contains no specific provisions barring the enrollment of children with questionable immigration status in public schools.

However, schools are mandated to determine the citizenship status of students, while parents of students with questionable status are required to provide documentation to the school within 30 days of the student's enrollment.

"As written, the law does not say you should turn them away at (the) doorstep," said Sam Brooke, an attorney with the Southern Poverty Law Center who works on immigration issues. "But the effect is going to be exactly that. If you pass a law that has chilling effect on constitutional rights, that's just as bad as passing a law banning the right in the first place."

The DOJ said school districts may ask for birth certificates to establish a student's age, but "may not bar a student from enrolling in its schools based on a foreign birth certificate."

Rep. Becky Nordgren, R-Gadsden, introduced a bill earlier this year that would have required school superintendents to notify law enforcement officials of parents who failed to provide proof of citizenship or immigration status to local school districts. The legislation did not make it out of committee.

Sally Howell, executive director of the Alabama Association of School Boards, said school boards would comply with the reporting requirements, but would prefer the section be eliminated, fearing it exposed school boards to litigation.

"School boards are going to comply with (the) law of land," she said. "But we don't want to be caught in the crosshairs of a constitutional battle."

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20110608/NEWS02/106080307/Immigration-law-makes-school-officials-uneasy?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

My Journey:

We met through a study-abroad program in Shanghai, China in August of 2009

We got engaged March of 2010

I received my K1 VISA in 6 months (June-December 2010)

We were married 04/02/2011
I received my conditional 2-year greencard (AOS) in 2.5 months with no interview (April-June 2011)

Our son was born 02/03/2013

I received my masters degree in Speech-Language Pathology 04/17/2013

I received my 10-year greencard (ROC) in 3 months with no interview (March-June 2013)

My husband returned from deployment 06/20/2013

My naturalization journey took 4 months (April-August 2014)

I became a US citizen on 08/01/2014

Received passport in 3 weeks (regular processing)

Thank you, VJ! smile.png

  • 1 month later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

post violating TOS has been removed

Edited by Kathryn41

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

. Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

Posted

Was this meant to be a poll, MBH? If so, I would vote "yea" on the matter.

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...