Jump to content
galatakulesi2003

what is the strongest evidence of bona fide relationship do you think?

 Share

48 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

IMO the strongest evidence you can provide to USCIS to prove a bona fide marriage is to show them that a couple is commingled financially. There are many couples that can't have children or they have chosen not to have children for personal and different reasons, but they still have a legitimate married, sometimes even happier that those who have children together. That's why for USCIS purpose to show financial ties are on the top, because into a real marriage must exist a financial commitment, though to have children cannot to be forced.

good.gif

Not to mention many of us are past the age of having children together.

USCIS

NOA1 08/19/08

NOA2 01/20/09

NVC

Received 01/26/09

Completed 02/13/09 (19 Days)

Interview Assigned 03/27/09 (6 weeks after NVC completion)

Medical

04/14/09 (Toronto)

Interview

Montreal 05/12/09 (88 days after NVC completion) **APPROVED**

POE

06/16/09 Buffalo

07/02/09 Welcome Letter Received

07/07/09 Applied for SSN

07/10/09 "Card production ordered" email received

07/13/09 SSN received

07/14/09 "Approval notice sent" email received

07/17/09 GREEN CARD received

Removal of Conditions

03/21/11 I-751 mailed to VSC

03/23/11 I-751 received at VSC

03/29/11 Cheque Cashed

03/30/11 NOA1 received (3/24/11)

04/11/11 Biometrics appointment notice received

05/05/11 Biometric appointment

12/13/11 **Approval date** (5 days short of 9 months!)

12/19/11 Approval letter and green card received

Naturalization

05/16/2019 Filed online (estimated completion February 2020)

05/18/2019 Biometrics scheduled

05/21/2019 Receipt notice and biometrics notices posted to online account.05/23/2019 Hard copy of NOA1 received

05/24/2019 Hard copy of biometrics appointment received

06/07/2019 Biometrics appointment (estimated completion January 2020)

12/31/2019 Email received "Interview scheduled"

01/01/2020 Interview date notice posted to online account (02/19/2020)

01/05/2019 Hard copy of interview appointment received

02/19/2020 Interview (**Approved**) and same day Oath Ceremony. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

Things like joint tax returns, both names on a lease for a house... that's strongest. Whatever shows a comingling of financial and personal lives.

We were able to enclose the "birth facts" sheet (from the hospital) for newborn Mini-Bone, plus a photo of him and the bleary-but-happy Papa & Mama T-B. after surviving the very first night in the hospital. Fortunately, I had put the rest of the ROC package together in advance, or we NEVER would have gotten it off. Things have gotten a bit less hectic now that Mini-B. is 4.5 months old -- those first 3 months were an experience, si man. :)

Speaking of babies, when you order the birth certificate, get at least 4 official copies -- you'll need them (they make great gifts for the grandmas, in addition to formal use).

I don't know why the birth certificate was $23 per copy when our marriage certificate was only $7 -- go figure, si man.

T Bone are doing this right now too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
T Bone are doing this right now too?
Huh, man? :huh:

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline

Things like joint tax returns, both names on a lease for a house... that's strongest. Whatever shows a comingling of financial and personal lives.

We were able to enclose the "birth facts" sheet (from the hospital) for newborn Mini-Bone, plus a photo of him and the bleary-but-happy Papa & Mama T-B. after surviving the very first night in the hospital. Fortunately, I had put the rest of the ROC package together in advance, or we NEVER would have gotten it off. Things have gotten a bit less hectic now that Mini-B. is 4.5 months old -- those first 3 months were an experience, si man. :)

I didn't know there was a mini-Bone, congrats on his arrival!

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline

As has been listed before: financial co-mingling.

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Mexico
Timeline

I understand the argument that financial co-mingling SHOULD be viewed as the strongest evidence of a valid marriage. However, I've seen a surprising number of posts from people who have received RFEs despite sending in a couple years of joint tax returns. On the other hand, I can't recall seeing a post about an RFE from someone who sent in a birth certificate for a biological child of the U.S. citizen and foreign spouse. Now maybe my memory is faulty and someone can dig up posts that disprove what I wrote, but I would tend to agree with the original post. Also, put yourselves in the shoes of an adjudicator--if there's a child involved, you may think twice about throwing up roadblocks to the immigration process.

By the way, none of what I wrote should be construed as an argument that children are necessary to prove the validity of a marriage. I'm just commenting on what I've observed.

11/30/07: Married in Mexico

I-130 Timeline
01/12/08: I-130 sent to VSC
02/11/08: NOA1
10/14/08: NOA2
11/18/08: Case complete at NVC
02/04/09: Interview--CR1 visa granted!
02/05/09: POE in El Paso, TX

Removal of Conditions Timeline
01/08/11: I-751 package sent to VSC
01/11/11: NOA1
02/08/11: Biometrics appointment
08/16/11: Approved!
08/20/11: 10-year green card received

Citizenship Timeline

03/03/14: N-400 sent to Dallas, TX

03/07/14: NOA1

04/03/14: Biometrics appointment

05/21/14: Interview--passed!

07/30/14: Oath ceremony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A baby might be the single strongest evidence, but there's a reason why it's not the only one asked. The term "anchor baby" was not created for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the argument that financial co-mingling SHOULD be viewed as the strongest evidence of a valid marriage. However, I've seen a surprising number of posts from people who have received RFEs despite sending in a couple years of joint tax returns. On the other hand, I can't recall seeing a post about an RFE from someone who sent in a birth certificate for a biological child of the U.S. citizen and foreign spouse. Now maybe my memory is faulty and someone can dig up posts that disprove what I wrote, but I would tend to agree with the original post. Also, put yourselves in the shoes of an adjudicator--if there's a child involved, you may think twice about throwing up roadblocks to the immigration process.

By the way, none of what I wrote should be construed as an argument that children are necessary to prove the validity of a marriage. I'm just commenting on what I've observed.

Oh, I have seen many filers that have kids together getting RFE and sometimes even they have to attend an interview. I don’t know if you understand Spanish, but if you do, I invite you to read the sub forum of Latin America here in VJ. Also another forum in Spanish where you can confirm what I’m telling you is Univision Immigration forum.

Problem I have seen with those filers is that they believe that they do not need to send much more evidence because they have kids together, and that should be enough to be approved, which we have to agree is not totally certain despite the fact that it’s completely unfair to those filers with not children.

I was approved without interview or RFE in both process AOS and ROC and we don’t have children together. Bottom line is each case is unique and the decision is in the hands of the IO that has your case.

K1-K2 Visas Journey

(Day 1) 05/23/07: Packet sent to CSC

(Day 247) 01/25/08: Interview. Approved!

(Day 254) 02/01/08: Visas Received.

AOS Journey K1-K2

(Day 1) 04/20/08: Application sent.

(Day 73) 07/02/08: EAD,AP Approved!

(Day 108) 08/05/08: AOS Approved!

(Day 114) 08/11/08: 2 years GC received.

ROC Journey K1-K2

(Day 1) 05/09/10: Application sent.

(Day 129) 09/14/10: ROC Approved!

(Day 135) 09/20/10: 10 years GC received.

Naturalization Journey

(Day 1) 10/02/11: Application sent.

(Day 122) 01/31/12: Interview. PASSED!

(Day 125) 02/03/12: Oath Ceremony. Done!

End of our Journey:

Daughter and I became U.S. Citizens on 02/03/2012.

(Day 1) 02/09/12: Applied for U.S. Passport & Passport card.

(Day 16) 02/24/12: Passport received.

(Day 19) 02/27/12: Passport Card received.

(Day 24) 03/03/12: Got CoN back.

N-600 for Daughter

(Day 1) 02/04/12: Application sent.

(Day 117) 05/30/12: Picked up Certificate of Citizenship at USCIS local office Chicago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

LOL :thumbs: :thumbs:

Don't mean to be rude.. I have a daughter myself... I just think this is a funny comment..

If you don’t mean to be rude why do you lets us know you have a daughter. I personally don’t care about that info.

I am not sure if I should help you guys here because you are trying to trivialize the info that Just-Bob give here because you probably feel personally alluded by his bluntness. On top of this his comment is right and all the latter comments are mostly wrong. For the USCIS having a child is not always good because having a child doesn’t always demonstrate an ongoing relationship. Having kids is only good for the USCIS when BOTH spouses participate in the child's development and education in and ongoing bases.

The most import information for the USCIS is joint assets. Bank account, joint loans etc. because people never joint their asset with people they don’t trust.

I have gathered this info from a past post where a member had Chat with USCIS director

Here is the link:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/220440-i-751-evidence/

Edited by deus360
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Turkey
Timeline

I think a child definetely shows that marriage is bona fide..i don't think those who get married only to get green card would like to make a child because their marriage is fake and they will want to divorce after they get the green card. However a child always doesn't show ongoing relationship. That is why uscis needs to see more evidence that proves ongoing relationship, but a child still an important proof..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Pakistan
Timeline

List I am submitting

1) Birth Cert. of baby

2) Joint Tax Returns

3) Same address on DL

4) Same address on ID cards from counry of Origin(myself, wife & baby)

Thats all there is to it. Rest is all commentary.

IR5 For Parent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

List I am submitting

1) Birth Cert. of baby

2) Joint Tax Returns

3) Same address on DL

4) Same address on ID cards from counry of Origin(myself, wife & baby)

Thats all there is to it. Rest is all commentary.

You should also submit joint tax transcripts because these legitimize your tax returns, because tax transcripts are issued by the IRS and are more difficult to fake. You should also maybe provide joint bank accounts or some other joint liabilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Morocco
Timeline

I think a child definetely shows that marriage is bona fide..i don't think those who get married only to get green card would like to make a child because their marriage is fake and they will want to divorce after they get the green card. However a child always doesn't show ongoing relationship. That is why uscis needs to see more evidence that proves ongoing relationship, but a child still an important proof..

I know of women who's husbands knocked them up, got their citizenship, and still left. There are no limits to what some individuals will do to stay in the US. USCIS knows this and judges people accordingly, using OTHER evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...