OFFENSIVE SPEACH should be illegal.

[Danno 1,228]

There's a new world coming.

[slim 1,533]

Too many cops.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Too many cops.

PIGS is more like it.

Those aren't cops. Those are pigs. Scum, dirt. Communist Trash.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

There is no 'a' in speech

[웃 910]

^^^

[luckytxn 2,265]

It is still OK for a politician to preach right?

[The Dude 206]

Too many cops.

More like too many degenerate criminals in this country. We should just deport them all, regardless if they are citizens or not.

[Zero Sum 305]

PIGS is more like it.

Those aren't cops. Those are pigs. Scum, dirt. Communist Trash.

You tell them. Only scummy, unbathed communist trash pigs try to uphold local ordnance these days.

[^_^ 5,021]

You tell them. Only scummy, unbathed communist trash pigs try to uphold local ordnance these days.

Edited May 21, 2011 by \

[Obama 2012 1,714]

You tell them. Only scummy, unbathed communist trash pigs try to uphold local ordnance these days.

Ordinances on freedom of speech?

Ummm, no.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

What the ** is 'speach' anyway? Sounds obscene. Should be illegal.

[Zero Sum 305]

Ordinances on freedom of speech?

Ummm, no.

I know you're so right about that, actually.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

I know you're so right about that, actually.

whether you're serious or not, I cannot tell.

Think of it this way..

When the Republican National Convention was in Minneapolis in '08, you had to get a 'permit' to protest and you had to be 'assigned' a spot to protest. Even then, you have to be 'scheduled' as well.

Don't get me wrong, I understand their reasoning, but in a country that is supposed to be about free speech, you would think that on a PUBLIC street, you would be able to hold a protest so long as you are doing no harm to anyone physically/impeding someone's way, etc...

[Zero Sum 305]

whether you're serious or not, I cannot tell.

Think of it this way..

When the Republican National Convention was in Minneapolis in '08, you had to get a 'permit' to protest and you had to be 'assigned' a spot to protest. Even then, you have to be 'scheduled' as well.

Don't get me wrong, I understand their reasoning, but in a country that is supposed to be about free speech, you would think that on a PUBLIC street, you would be able to hold a protest so long as you are doing no harm to anyone physically/impeding someone's way, etc...

That's because speech and protesting are two separate things when done in public.

Do the police sometimes overstep their authority in enforcing local ordinance? Sure, sometimes.

Your rant on the rest is pretty lame though. A bit... delusional.