Ron Paul admits he would not have ordered the bin Laden kill

[slim 1,525]

This is why we need more guns to protect us from this tyranny.

You're finally starting to get it.

[Zero Sum 305]

You're finally starting to get it.

Exactly!

I have always believed in the 2nd Amendment. We need to be protected from these police thugs. I am sure we will have the necessary firepower to defend our property from invading police officers trying to arrest us for unjust crimes.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

I get what zero is saying in his sarcasm, though I don't like that this ruling is based on the idea that the law will protect the person in the end, given how law can change over time....like this ruling where 800 years of precedent went down the drain.

[BishopM 114]

I suppose it depends which caste you are born to. If you are born to the priest caste, then killing would be out of character, but if you are born to the warrior caste, then that is your destiny.

hmmmmm....brother, your reply is +1 and correct...very Bhagavad Gita of you...I am seriously impressed!

Blessings - Bishopji

[rlogan 2,036]

So typical of big brother tyranny fans to manipulatively phrase it as an "admission", as if he were "confessing" something.

Ron Paul did already and will continue to force the other candidates to address the ghastly out-of-control spending, the removal of checks and balances by concentrating far too much power in the executive, and the debasing of the currency through open market operations of the federal reserve.

When you get behind the personal attacks by people making them against Ron Paul you invariably find they are sucking off the government ####### somehow, and that is what they hate about Ron Paul - the idea of making their keep without the police power of the state behind them.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

You mean you can't fault Ron Paul for believing integration was federal government over-reach into the 'rights' of private citizens and their business establishments? Unless you are 'sucking on the government teat?'

[^_^ 5,021]

When you get behind the personal attacks by people making them against Ron Paul you invariably find they are sucking off the government ####### somehow, and that is what they hate about Ron Paul - the idea of making their keep without the police power of the state behind them.

You mean you can't fault Ron Paul for believing integration was federal government over-reach into the 'rights' of private citizens and their business establishments? Unless you are 'sucking on the government teat?'

Yeah, that is what he is saying. As is the case with everything else he says, he's wrong about this too.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

You mean you can't fault Ron Paul for believing integration was federal government over-reach into the 'rights' of private citizens and their business establishments? Unless you are 'sucking on the government teat?'

Yeah, that is what he is saying. As is the case with everything else he says, he's wrong about this too.

That is the price you pay for sucking on Uncle Sam's moob. If you want privacy, then don't feed at the taxpayer trough.