Jump to content

136 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

The wheels came of on the first relationship. I can buy this. As for you meeting another guy that you already want to marry, this is total bull, or you are seeing this person through rose colored glasses because you want to stay in the U.S. My advice, first, think about do you really want to spend your life with this guy, or do you just want a way into the U.S. It's going to get ugly if you are just trying to immigrate, and married to someone that you don't really love. Second, if you are sincere about this, get a good immigration attorney.

Feb. 2005 - Met in Brazil the first time

May. 2005 - Visited Brazil

Aug. 2005 - Visited Brazil

10/30/05 - Mailed I129F

11/09/05 - NOA1

Nov. 2005 - Visited my fiance in Brazil

02/02/06 - NOA2

Feb. 2006 - Visited my fiance in Brazil

02/24/06 - Packet received at NVC

03/20/06 - Fiance received packet 3 from consulate

04/26/06 - Fiance received appointment letter

05/09/06 - I flew to Rio

5/10/06 - Met fiance at airport

5/11/06 - Medical exam in Rio

05/12/06 - Interview in Rio - APPROVED!!!!

05/17/06 - Received visa in Rio

07/20/06 - POE Miami

10/16/06 - Married!!!!

01/10/07 - Sent AOS and EAD application

01/17/07 - NOA - Receipt

02/02/07 - Biometric appointment

02/09/07 - NOA - Transfer of case to California center

03/22/07 - EAD approved

05/10/07 - AOS approved!!!!

Eulalia and Bill

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Just to put the cat among the proverbial birds here...

To the best of my understanding, she can marry whoever she wants to and apply for AOS. She cannot do it based on the I-129F from her K1, but I don't believe she (or rather, her new husband) is prohibited to file an I-130 on her behalf. It would be more ethical for her to return to Manila and file for a new K1, or marry and wait out the K3, but I don't believe she cannot AOS. I would suggest very strongly a consultation with an competent immigration attorney before she does anything though.

You guys may not like it, but I think that everyone is entitled to a "life happens" clause. I met my (now) husband in March '05, and we married in June '05. Three months - is that an automatic fraud indicator? Because we're still happily married over a year later. I was engaged to another USC when we met, although I was working out of the US on a C1/D visa rather than being here as a K1. Was I just looking for a green card, any USC would do? No. I found two individual men who both happened to be American citizens.

Sometimes things work out differently than you plan, so be a little gentle.

:star:

Sorry Christina.. the INA is clear.. she is only eligible to get permanent residency via AOS through marriage to the original K1 petitioner. If she waishes to marry someone else, she will have to leave the US and enter the US and get issued another status. Since she is Filipino and has already had a K-visa issued, the only way she's going to get a visa into the US in a reasonable period of time is with another K visa of some type.

As Yodrak insinuates, there is only one other way that she can get permanent residency without leaving the US. But I'm going to leave that for an attorney to spell out...

Edited by zyggy

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Hi Everybody,

After reading through many posts here earlier and now, I can understand why some of you feel the way you feel about my situation. Maybe I shoul have explained in detail about our intentions. I did not want so many of you to get angry for no reason.

It is very natural sometimes for two people to be in love and want to get married as quickly as we want to. I never intended to "catch someone" or did not even think I can meet anyone so quickly after being in a failed relationship.

However, this is as the situation is, and in fact, we are also ready to wait out the time required for me to go back to manila and apply for K3 visa. My now fiance and soon to be husband is not able to come and stay with me because he has a good job here and he can only come for visits. We are only trying to find out if there is a way we can avoid me going back to Manila, however if we cannot find a good way, we will ahve no other choice but for us to get married now, and for me to go back, or for my husband to come to manila and for us to get married there. I understand this. The only reason why I am asking this question now is, because I do not want to stay here illegally after 90 days if we do not have a good chance of staying together.

So, again, I please ask all of you to accept my apologies for making all of you feel so angry and I ask the ones who can, to please give me advice what, if any, way we can remain together....It is mainly after reading all your posts and going through the wait myself that I am not sure I will be able to go through such a wait again, with so much heartache, that I ask this...It may not be fair to others who are waiting, but all we can do is try....

Yodrak, you have suggested some other option other than me going back. Can you please elaborate.....

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Hi Everybody,

After reading through many posts here earlier and now, I can understand why some of you feel the way you feel about my situation. Maybe I shoul have explained in detail about our intentions. I did not want so many of you to get angry for no reason.

It is very natural sometimes for two people to be in love and want to get married as quickly as we want to. I never intended to "catch someone" or did not even think I can meet anyone so quickly after being in a failed relationship.

However, this is as the situation is, and in fact, we are also ready to wait out the time required for me to go back to manila and apply for K3 visa. My now fiance and soon to be husband is not able to come and stay with me because he has a good job here and he can only come for visits. We are only trying to find out if there is a way we can avoid me going back to Manila, however if we cannot find a good way, we will ahve no other choice but for us to get married now, and for me to go back, or for my husband to come to manila and for us to get married there. I understand this. The only reason why I am asking this question now is, because I do not want to stay here illegally after 90 days if we do not have a good chance of staying together.

So, again, I please ask all of you to accept my apologies for making all of you feel so angry and I ask the ones who can, to please give me advice what, if any, way we can remain together....It is mainly after reading all your posts and going through the wait myself that I am not sure I will be able to go through such a wait again, with so much heartache, that I ask this...It may not be fair to others who are waiting, but all we can do is try....

Yodrak, you have suggested some other option other than me going back. Can you please elaborate.....

That is for you and your attorney... if you want to find out, you going to have to have a consultation...

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted
chuck and kim,

This is not true. She has 90 days of authorized stay in the USA whether she marries her petitioner or not.

Yodrak

.... your K-1 visa status is only good if you marry him within 90 days, otherwise you will be out of status and a ban may be triggered upon this "misused" of your K-1 Visa.

....

chuck and kim

I always understand that K-1 Visa is issued to the beneficiary to enter the US for a very specific purpose: get married within 90 days to the petitioner who applied the I-129F. Her K-1 LEGAL status is good for 90 days. The 90 days clock starts ticking the moment she enters POE, so get married or stay illegally after the 90 days. I don't know or even care if there is any other option that may be availabale to her to stay here. The fact here is she would be lying and misused her K-1 Visa to marry anyone other than her K-1 Petitioner. Folks on VJ work their @$$ off to get a visa for their lovers to come and get married to them. This case smells funny and it is Illegal to misuse K-1 Visa.

Maybe, I should be more specific: "your k-1 status is legal, if you marry your petitioner within 90. After 90 days without married the petitioner, you're out-of-status and remain here ILLEGALLY, a ban may be triggered upon your future entry to the US." Still wrong?

"You always get what you've always gotten if you always do what you always did."

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

I think you can stay the 90 days, then you're out of status.

Hi Everybody,

After reading through many posts here earlier and now, I can understand why some of you feel the way you feel about my situation. Maybe I shoul have explained in detail about our intentions. I did not want so many of you to get angry for no reason.

It is very natural sometimes for two people to be in love and want to get married as quickly as we want to. I never intended to "catch someone" or did not even think I can meet anyone so quickly after being in a failed relationship.

However, this is as the situation is, and in fact, we are also ready to wait out the time required for me to go back to manila and apply for K3 visa. My now fiance and soon to be husband is not able to come and stay with me because he has a good job here and he can only come for visits. We are only trying to find out if there is a way we can avoid me going back to Manila, however if we cannot find a good way, we will ahve no other choice but for us to get married now, and for me to go back, or for my husband to come to manila and for us to get married there. I understand this. The only reason why I am asking this question now is, because I do not want to stay here illegally after 90 days if we do not have a good chance of staying together.

So, again, I please ask all of you to accept my apologies for making all of you feel so angry and I ask the ones who can, to please give me advice what, if any, way we can remain together....It is mainly after reading all your posts and going through the wait myself that I am not sure I will be able to go through such a wait again, with so much heartache, that I ask this...It may not be fair to others who are waiting, but all we can do is try....

Yodrak, you have suggested some other option other than me going back. Can you please elaborate.....

Feb. 2005 - Met in Brazil the first time

May. 2005 - Visited Brazil

Aug. 2005 - Visited Brazil

10/30/05 - Mailed I129F

11/09/05 - NOA1

Nov. 2005 - Visited my fiance in Brazil

02/02/06 - NOA2

Feb. 2006 - Visited my fiance in Brazil

02/24/06 - Packet received at NVC

03/20/06 - Fiance received packet 3 from consulate

04/26/06 - Fiance received appointment letter

05/09/06 - I flew to Rio

5/10/06 - Met fiance at airport

5/11/06 - Medical exam in Rio

05/12/06 - Interview in Rio - APPROVED!!!!

05/17/06 - Received visa in Rio

07/20/06 - POE Miami

10/16/06 - Married!!!!

01/10/07 - Sent AOS and EAD application

01/17/07 - NOA - Receipt

02/02/07 - Biometric appointment

02/09/07 - NOA - Transfer of case to California center

03/22/07 - EAD approved

05/10/07 - AOS approved!!!!

Eulalia and Bill

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

chuck and kim,

This is not true. She has 90 days of authorized stay in the USA whether she marries her petitioner or not.

Yodrak

.... your K-1 visa status is only good if you marry him within 90 days, otherwise you will be out of status and a ban may be triggered upon this "misused" of your K-1 Visa.

....

chuck and kim

I always understand that K-1 Visa is issued to the beneficiary to enter the US for a very specific purpose: get married within 90 days to the petitioner who applied the I-129F. Her K-1 LEGAL status is good for 90 days. The 90 days clock starts ticking the moment she enters POE, so get married or stay illegally after the 90 days. I don't know or even care if there is any other option that may be availabale to her to stay here. The fact here is she would be lying and misused her K-1 Visa to marry anyone other than her K-1 Petitioner. Folks on VJ work their @$$ off to get a visa for their lovers to come and get married to them. This case smells funny and it is Illegal to misuse K-1 Visa.

Maybe, I should be more specific: "your k-1 status is legal, if you marry your petitioner within 90. After 90 days without married the petitioner, you're out-of-status and remain here ILLEGALLY, a ban may be triggered upon your future entry to the US." Still wrong?

Prima fascie, it may smell funny.. but once all the details are exposed it may not be... and we know very little... That's why a consultation with an immigration attorney is imperative...

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Posted

Wow. This thread is a good example of so many people spouting misinformation without basis. For those of you that have been corrected ... please be more careful in the future. If you don't know for sure maybe your advice is unwarranted. Don't feel compelled to give an answer if you don't know the correct answer.

05/16/2005 I-129F Sent

05/28/2005 I-129F NOA1

06/21/2005 I-129F NOA2

07/18/2005 Consulate Received package from NVC

11/09/2005 Medical

11/16/2005 Interview APPROVED

12/05/2005 Visa received

12/07/2005 POE Minneapolis

12/17/2005 Wedding

12/20/2005 Applied for SSN

01/14/2005 SSN received in the mail

02/03/2006 AOS sent (Did not apply for EAD or AP)

02/09/2006 NOA

02/16/2006 Case status Online

05/01/2006 Biometrics Appt.

07/12/2006 AOS Interview APPROVED

07/24/2006 GC arrived

05/02/2007 Driver's License - Passed Road Test!

05/27/2008 Lifting of Conditions sent (TSC > VSC)

06/03/2008 Check Cleared

07/08/2008 INFOPASS (I-551 stamp)

07/08/2008 Driver's License renewed

04/20/2009 Lifting of Conditions approved

04/28/2009 Card received in the mail

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

Funny the ONE thing that caught her eye out of ALL These posts was Yodrak saying there is a way she could stay...

NOT any of the posts about CONSULTING A QUALIFIED ATTORNEY!!!!

Finally finished with immigration in 2012!

familyxmas-1-1.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted

one needs to stay, will find the way! Really, legal or not legal, she can stay here, have babies and run into some church in Chicago for refuge... So, why not!

"You always get what you've always gotten if you always do what you always did."

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted
one needs to stay, will find the way! Really, legal or not legal, she can stay here, have babies and run into some church in Chicago for refuge... So, why not!

I'm curious... just a hypothethical here... if she finds an innocent schumuck to impregnate her and over stays illegally until her child is born, will she have a defense to stay in this country as the child is born--and the child having been born in the US is a US citizen. Can she claim she has the right to stay here as her child is a US citizen and a mother needs to be with a newborn baby. Has this defense been used successfully in the past? Yorak?

AOS I-485

07/10/07 - Sent I-485 via USPS Priority Mail to Chicago Lockbox

07/23/07 - Received NOA1 in my home mailbox

08/13/07 - Received ASC Biometrics Appointment Letter in my home mailbox

08/31/07 - USCIS mailed out Appointment letter with Postmark Date 8/31/07

09/04/07 - Received actual Appointment Letter (Interivew Date 10/30/07)

09/06/07 - Completed Biometrics Appointment at local ASC

10/30/07 - Scheduled AOS Interview Appointment - Approved

I-751

08/13/09 - Sent I-751 to CSC

08/17/09 - Receipt date of NOA

09/16/09 - Biometrics

09/17/09 - "Touched"

12/15/09 - Card production ordered

12/17/09 - Approval notice sent

12/21/09 - Received 10-Year GC and Welcome Letter

N-400

08/16/10 - Sent N-400 to AZ Lockbox via USPS First Class Mail with Delivery Confirmation

08/18/10 - USPS Confirms delivery: August 18, 2010, 9:57 am, PHOENIX, AZ 85036

08/24/10 - Check #501 for $675 cleared my account @ 11:20 pm EDT

08/27/10 - Received NOA dated 8/23/10 with a Priority date of 8/18/10

09/07/10 - Received Biometric RFE dated 9/3/10 -- Fingerprint apt. schedule 10/1/10

10/01/10 - Fingerprint Appointment-- Completed

10/09/10 - Received Interview Appointment Letter dated 10/6/10 for scheduled interview on 11/09/10

11/09/10 - Interview Passed

11/18/10 - Oath Ceremony

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I've been reading this post, and I just wanted to say to the OP that I hope you find a way to get to wherever you need to be in your life to be truly happy. And I second the have a consultation with a well-respected lawyer. They can give your more clear and educated advice than those of us who know little to nothing about your case can.

:star: Cass (bebop the great)

us.gif

timeline.gif

K-1

Service Center: California (transferred from Nebraska)

Consulate: Vancouver, Canada (transferred from Montreal)

06.17.2006 — Engagement!

08.23.2006 — NOA1

11.01.2006 — NOA2

01.25.2007 — Interview—APPPROOOVVEEEDD!!

02.12.2007 — Entry date!

03.01.2007 — Applied for SSN.

03.08.2007 — Social Security Card arrives! :)

03.17.2007 — Wedding day! Happy St. Patty's Day! YAY! :D

AOS/EAD

04.30.2007 — AOS/EAD Mailed off (No AP)

05.02.2007 — Arrives in Chicago.

05.08.2007 — NOA1 for AOS/EAD

06.01.2007 — Biometrics (and EAD Touch)

06.14.2007 — AOS Touch

06.17.2007 — AOS Transferred to CSC

06.19.2007 — AOS Touch

06.20.2007 — AOS Touch

06.21.2007 — AOS Touch (They must be doing something!)

07.25.2007 — EA Card Arrives. YAY! :)

09.03.2007 — AOS Touch, something finally!

09.05.2007 — AOS Touch

09.07.2007 — AOS Touch

09.09.2007 — AOS Touch

09.10.2007 — AOS Touch

09.11.2007 — AOS Approval without interview

09.17.2007 — Welcome to America! Letter arrives

09.29.2007 — Green card arrives! WOOO! No more USCIS until 06/09.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted

She won't have any defense to stay in the country - just having a USC child (or husband) doesn't help until the child is 21 is can petition for the parent. The woman in Chicago will end up being deported in my opinion.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...