Jump to content
^_^

What would suck least?

By ^_^ in General Polls

 Share

What would suck least?  

40 members have voted

  1. 1. What would suck least? Assume your choice only affects the future, not the past. All works of poetry and feats of engineering already in existence will remain so.

    • A world without poets
      32
    • A world without engineers
      8

  2. 2. What would suck least?

    • A world without Big Oil
      20
    • A world without Big Pharma
      20

  3. 3. What would suck least?

    • A constitutional amendment stripping Americans of the right to bear arms
      29
    • A constitutional amendment stripping Americans of the right to free speech
      6
    • The U.S.A. ceases to exist
      5

17 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,288

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

Honestly? The third question can't be answered, because if either of the first two is voted for, the third is automatically voted for.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
I AM NOT THAT GUY Grand Master

I AM NOT THAT GUY   5,715

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted

None of it is important. Humans deal as a species. As individuals, we suck -- big time.

I tend to think that the set of circumstances that would have to occur to allow removing either of the first two amendments are significantly worse than simply not having a country at all.

I can't believe I agree with A.J. Countries are not important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kathryn41 Grand Master

Kathryn41   3,205

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
 Timeline
Posted

Post containing inappropriate comment has been removed. Acceptable parts of the post have been returned to the thread below:

It's easy to vote, you just don't want to. .

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

.― Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dude Proficient

The Dude   206

Posted
Filed: Other Country: Andorra
 Timeline
Posted

Post containing inappropriate comment has been removed. Acceptable parts of the post have been returned to the thread below:

No offense Kathryn, but thats bull. What I posted was not a violation of the TOS.

What the hell did I miss???????????

I stated that if he focused more on logical thinking and less on assaulting people (wedgies are an assault or battery depending on the circumstances), then it wouldn't be so difficult of a decision to make.

Indy.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites
^_^ Grand Master

^_^   5,021

Posted
Filed: Timeline
  • Author
Posted

No offense Kathryn, but thats bull. What I posted was not a violation of the TOS.

I stated that if he focused more on logical thinking and less on assaulting people (wedgies are an assault or battery depending on the circumstances), then it wouldn't be so difficult of a decision to make.

They are assault if unwanted and unwelcome. And if it's not assault, it is plain weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...