Jump to content
one...two...tree

Clever Study Uses Genetics Trick to Trace Language Back to Its Very Beginning, in Africa

 Share

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

What’s the News: Southern Africa may be the birthplace of human language, according a new study published yesterday in Science. The study further suggests that language may have arisen only once, with one ancestral language giving rise to all modern tongues, an idea linguists have long debated. This finding parallels the human migrations out of Africa supported by genetic and fossil evidence.

How the Heck:

  • The study’s author, evolutionary psychologist Quentin Atkinson of the University of Auckland in New Zealand, looked at 504 modern languages from around the world.
  • He then tallied the phonemes—the distinct sounds of consonants, vowels and tones—that make up each language. Languages vary widely in how many phonemes they have: Some of the Khoisan languages in Africa (widely known for their click sounds) have more than a hundred phonemes, while languages spoken in many Pacific islands have far fewer, such as Hawaiian’s 13. (English is somewhere in the middle, with about 45.)
  • To build a model for the origins of language, Atkinson borrowed an idea from population genetics: the founder effect, which says that when a small group branches off from a population, it loses genetic diversity.
  • Performing mathematical analysis to bring together the number of phonemes a language had and its location on the globe, Atkinson found a linguistic founder effect: The farther from Africa, the fewer phonemes a language had—the less diverse its sounds were. This distance from Africa explained 30% of the variation in number of phonemes a language had, and still explained nearly 20% of the variation when modern population size was taken into account (since smaller populations are also linked to a smaller number of phonemes).

What’s the Context:

  • Language is believed to be at least 50,000 years old, and could be 100,000 years old, predating the human migrations out of Africa that began about 50,000 years ago. The development of language in Africa, Atkinson told the Wall Street Journal, “was the catalyst that spurred the human expansion that we all are a product of.”
  • Using the traditional methods of tracking how words evolve, linguists have only been able to trace particular languages back less than 10,000 years, since words change so quickly (and there are no written records going back further). By taking a different approach, Atkinson may have gleaned information about language much further back in time.

Not So Fast:

  • While Atkinson’s idea stems from population genetics, the mechanisms of change in the two fields are very different: A population’s genetic diversity changes over generations, while phonemes can change far more rapidly. The founder effect accounts for a different amount of the variation between groups, as well, explaining up to 85% of the genetic diversity in populations but only about 20% of the phoneme diversity in languages.
  • Many linguists aren’t yet sure if they should believe what they hear. As University of Pennsylvania linguist Donald A. Ringe told the New York Times, “It’s too early to tell if Atkinson’s idea is correct, but if so, it’s one of the most interesting articles in historical linguistics that I’ve seen in a decade.”

Reference: Quentin D. Atkinson. “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa,” Science, April 15, 2011. DOI:10.1126/science.1199295

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/04/15/clever-study-uses-genetics-trick-to-trace-language-back-to-its-very-beginning-in-africa/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+80beats+%2880beats%29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline

:lol: Must have been English if it was South Africa. right?

Probably Ebonics. :whistle:

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...