Ewok, is this the low standard you accept from a mod?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Not where I work.

Some of these NSFW policies are insane. Like working for the Taliban or Spanish Inquisition

[^_^ 5,021]

Some of these NSFW policies are insane. Like working for the Taliban or Spanish Inquisition

Everyone's scared of getting sued.

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

Why is it that so many women have it in for the RUB forum ?

Maybe because certain RUB men whine about it so much?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Why is it that so many women have it in for the RUB forum ?

Jealous. Of the women more than the men...or, maybe not.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

IF that is actually how you feel, then maybe you should express it rather than the usual misogyny. Seems quite convenient that you suddenly respect western women since being accused of misogyny publicly.

So I guess first marriages to a western woman don't count in your statistics? Don't post unsubstantiated bullsh!t like that, it only furthers your foolish image.

Misogynist comments are OK as long as they are only about a western ex-wife. Got it Brad.

Now you disagree with me that American women are not fat and sloppy? I never said they were. Ever.

First marriages to western women would not count in the divorce rate of western men later married to RUB women...you are correct.

I do not agree with you that mysogynist comments are OK if directed at western women.

[Jenn! 918]

There should be separate, anonymous mod accounts in order to prevent this sort of thing.

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

There should be separate, anonymous mod accounts in order to prevent this sort of thing.

i thought that was tried a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.

[TracyTN 237]

Was it? I don't remember that. I still think it's a brilliant idea.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

We could call them the Secret Squad, or SS for short.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Maybe because certain RUB men whine about it so much?

You don't see peeps from the RUB forum being ####### retentive and trying to control everything. We live and let live. There seems to be a certain click on here that runs to this forum every chance they get to whine and whine more. It's like there can't ever be enough rules for these peeps for them to be happy.

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

I don't know - there's no other regional forum where the native members flip out when someone with the wrong flag posts something. That seems whiny/####### retentive to me.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

I don't know - there's no other regional forum where the native members flip out when someone with the wrong flag posts something. That seems whiny/####### retentive to me.

Iv'e seen that happen a few times now...peeps over reacting over nothing. But that goes both ways I think. Iv'e seen it on both sides. Some peeps act like they are gun shy or something. Everyone seems to be getting along now...which makes for boring, but oh well, at least we all get along like happy campers.

[Pooky 3,786]

Was it? I don't remember that. I still think it's a brilliant idea.

It was tried. It crashed and burned badly.

Have you seen the "Who is Vi-Jay" thread? Multiply that by the number of moderator pseudonyms. And some of the more prolific posters at the time were driven away by the suspicion and animosity the situation generated.

Bad idea.

[Jenn! 918]

It was tried. It crashed and burned badly.

Have you seen the "Who is Vi-Jay" thread? Multiply that by the number of moderator pseudonyms. And some of the more prolific posters at the time were driven away by the suspicion and animosity the situation generated.

Bad idea.

It seems to work in other large moderated forums - I see no reason that VJ should be different. The mod accounts do not engage in lengthy exchanges with the members. They do their business and get out.

[Fandango 1,439]

Because there wasn't. Nothing more than a platform to attack some one (particularly some one who moderates you - and you don't like it).

Who says that? You are the only one making comments like that. Should some one report you, or just start a thread complaining about what a terrible misogynist you are? Do you seriously think this about American women?

And furthermore, eekee actually got the joke and was not bothered a bit. Any one on VJ who acknowledges that men are visual/tactile creatures are sure to get into trouble with the facebook posse (unless there is an easier target).

In other words, I am defending YOU from this terrible mod. If you disagree, YOU CAN JUST STAY OUT OF IT.

Because it was exactly that. Creating a thread (instead of the report threatened or PM suggested) was the purpose. This kind of attack is a TOS violation as well. Lisa sent a report hours after she started this thread, when a mod asked her about it. It isn't difficult to see what the real goal is here.

It's not a TOS Violation, I happen to think you're a terrible mod, and obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so.

I didn't 'report' the thread at first, because it's been so long that I actually ever reported someone, that at first I didn't know where the report button was. Then, I thought - the report's just gonna go to you anyway, so why bother. I only reported it because Charles actually pm'd me asking me where the report was.

The real goat is that you fail at reading comprehension, if you think what I took umbrage with was the 'visual creatures' comment. It's your behavior I find unbecoming a mod. Even your reply here proves my point.

But at the end of the day, nothing will be done about this anyway, so it will continue on as usual.

Now here's another thing I never did before...as the OP, I am requesting a lock. You have questions as to what is upsetting? Re read here. If you still don't grasp it, then there's nothing more I can do.

Now, kindly lock this thread. And since you're a mod, and I'm the OP, I expect the next line to be 'thread locked at OP's request'. Or, you can show more of your true colors by having more of a sh!t fling with me, which again, was my inital point anyway.

Thanks!