So Obama is Running For Re-election (duh)......

[The Dude 206]

They don't. An airport does not have to allow the TSA to be a part of their security team. NEXT.

Wrong Paul. An airport must provide adequate security. If they don't wish to pay to provide their own, which must meet the governments standards (and continue to do so), they can. Even then, the private company is only administering the TSA's regulations.

Source

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Wrong Paul. An airport must provide adequate security. If they don't wish to pay to provide their own, which must meet the governments standards (and continue to do so), they can. Even then, the private company is only administering the TSA's regulations.

Source

your literacy is astounding.

"Adequate" security is very questionable when it comes to the likes of the TSA and you know it. Violating the 4th and 5th amendments keep them from being a legitimate organization.

[CarlosAndSveta 808]

Wrong Paul. An airport must provide adequate security. If they don't wish to pay to provide their own, which must meet the governments standards (and continue to do so), they can. Even then, the private company is only administering the TSA's regulations.

Source

He won't admit that he is wrong. I already pointed out the Federal law that covers TSA security in his thread on that subject yet he still says they have no authority.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

He won't admit that he is wrong. I already pointed out the Federal law that covers TSA security in his thread on that subject yet he still says they have no authority.

Never said that don't have any authority.

The reading comprehension around here is pure ####### lately, i swear.

I've talked about what they cannot do and what's constitutional and not, but never said they don't have any authority.

[The Dude 206]

your literacy is astounding.

"Adequate" security is very questionable when it comes to the likes of the TSA and you know it. Violating the 4th and 5th amendments keep them from being a legitimate organization.

Paul, you would actually make a point here, if you included a fact or two to substantiate your suppositions. But you're still wrong. The TSA has a right to be at each airport, just not necissarily as the administering personnel at the airport. Your illiteracy astounds me Paul. You should educate yourself, it would save you from some of these ignorant moments.

[The Dude 206]

Never said that don't have any authority.

The reading comprehension around here is pure ####### lately, i swear.

I've talked about what they cannot do and what's constitutional and not, but never said they don't have any authority.

You're arguing semantics here. Even in that case, your poor use of grammar lack of comprehension betray you.

They don't. An airport does not have to allow the TSA to be a part of their security team. NEXT.

They dont' have to allow the TSA to staff their security team, but they do have to follow the guidelines established and maintained by the TSA. Furthermore, they are required continually show compliance with TSA regulations.

[CarlosAndSveta 808]

Never said that don't have any authority.

The reading comprehension around here is pure ####### lately, i swear.

I've talked about what they cannot do and what's constitutional and not, but never said they don't have any authority.

Then explain what you meant when you wrote this in your other thread:

the thing is, the TSA agents don't have to be allowed at the airports to begin with. There's no law on the books that mandates the TSA per se. There are a few airports that use a different security company.

TSA guidelines aren't set by themselves and not by congress as well. So there's no 'law' that the state has to abide by in this situation either.

Until that happens, Texas and the other states that have done this, have the upper hand.

[^_^ 5,021]

Then explain what you meant when you wrote this in your other thread:

You need a few courses in remedial literacy!

[Sergi9 110]

Civil liberties are the least of our worries. I have social conservatives as much as the next guy does, but when it gets down to it, they aren't as bad as the fiscal policies we have to worry about on certain Democrats and Republicans.

Really? Can you name a country with a higher per capita incarceration rate than the US?

[CarlosAndSveta 808]

You need a few courses in remedial literacy!

I'll put my reading comprehension skills against yours any day.

[^_^ 5,021]

I'll put my reading comprehension skills against yours any day.

reading?

that's your problem right there obamafanboi.

books just turn people into dumb commies. haven't ya heard? (heard, not read).

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Then explain what you meant when you wrote this in your other thread:

the TSA isn't mandated. The TSA is the 'filler' technically if an airport does not wish to provide their own security.

Private security firms are allowed, so long as they abide by the law set forth in the ATSA. The security company must prove to the under secretary that they are indeed following the law, but that's about it.

The TSA doesn't get to change the rules and laws on a whim though. You can't change security mandates/laws without an act of congress. We don't work that way in this country.

It's a lot easier to use the TSA because there's no red-tape, but even the TSA has been known to royally screw up from time to time. The difference between them and a private security firm, is a private security firm wants to keep its contract. The TSA has nothing to lose in its actions. I'd trust someone under contract more.

[The Dude 206]

the TSA isn't mandated. The TSA is the 'filler' technically if an airport does not wish to provide their own security.

Private security firms are allowed, so long as they abide by the law set forth in the ATSA. The security company must prove to the under secretary that they are indeed following the law, but that's about it.

The TSA doesn't get to change the rules and laws on a whim though. You can't change security mandates/laws without an act of congress. We don't work that way in this country.

It's a lot easier to use the TSA because there's no red-tape, but even the TSA has been known to royally screw up from time to time. The difference between them and a private security firm, is a private security firm wants to keep its contract. The TSA has nothing to lose in its actions. I'd trust someone under contract more.

You're still wrong, but I thought this might make you feel better

[Obama 2012 1,714]

You're still wrong, but I thought this might make you feel better

read the ATSA and then get back to me.

[^_^ 5,021]

read the ATSA and then get back to me.

and the beat goes on!