He doesn't like GUNS.

[The_Dude 1,142]

some people do consider you a gun nut for having just one firearm. as for banana clips, what do you consider to be one? by piercing i assume you mean armor piercing? and just what is an assault rifle? this maybe?

Yes, I did mean armor piercing. I don't like using that full term though because most people seem to go straight to depleted uranium rounds or something uniquely military like that. Charles, those pics that you posted, I support the right to own the first one, but oppose the right to own the second one, as well as the kit available to convert it. What do I consider a banana clip? I'm assuming that is a rhetorical question.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

add to the conversation much?

What you wrote has nothing to do with anything that's been said in the thread. All it does is polarise the thread and create a bogus impression that gun owners are somehow being victimised. It's tosh.

[Ban Hammer 13,429]

Yes, I did mean armor piercing. I don't like using that full term though because most people seem to go straight to depleted uranium rounds or something uniquely military like that. Charles, those pics that you posted, I support the right to own the first one, but oppose the right to own the second one, as well as the kit available to convert it. What do I consider a banana clip? I'm assuming that is a rhetorical question.

same rifle, it's still a .22 rifle.

ap doesn't have a hunting application that i can think of. i suppose some shoot it as it's military surplus and thus cheaper to shoot than factory loads.

banana clips aren't a rhetorical question. at what capacity do they become one to you? imo drums are the greater of the two if one is seeking an evil.

What you wrote has nothing to do with anything that's been said in the thread. All it does is polarise the thread and create a bogus impression that gun owners are somehow being victimised. It's tosh.

they are. pay attention.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Rubbish. It's a irrelevant video response to a silly music video. Getting worked up about it to suggest that somehow gun owners are victims is just childish.

[Ban Hammer 13,429]

not a surprising response.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Neither is that. You seem to want to appear a victim. The other day you were complaining that you've been victimised because someone disagreed with you about "consensual adult behaviour". Today it's getting attacked because.you own a gun. Nothing that remotely relates to the OP, the conversation at hand or anything said in the thread.

[Ban Hammer 13,429]

Neither is that. You seem to want to appear a victim. The other day you were complaining that you've been victimised because someone disagreed with you about "consensual adult behaviour". Today it's getting attacked because.you own a gun. Nothing that remotely relates to the OP, the conversation at hand or anything said in the thread.

bollocks.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

If you don't want to create the impression that you, and by extension: gun owners, are being victimised by non gun owners, why bring it up?

Logically, if what i said is 'bollocks', you wouldn't have done that. Yet, you have.

[Ban Hammer 13,429]

If you don't want to create the impression that you, and by extension: gun owners, are being victimised by non gun owners, why bring it up?

Logically, if what i said is 'bollocks', you wouldn't have done that. Yet, you have.

if you believe gun owners aren't being victimized by non gun owners, then your eyes are shut.

see chicago for more info, if you were really interested in being more enlightened.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Enlightened to you wanting to appear a victim on a message board?

[Peikko 1,575]

If a gun owner can be victimised by a non gun owner, doesn't that make gun ownership nonsensical? I thought the whole point of owning a gun was to prevent oneself from becoming a victim, and now I find it's singularly unsuccessful. Magic!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Words hurt more than bullets :-P why shoot someone's body full of holes when you can shoot up their ego!

[Peikko 1,575]

It's a particularly wierd line of reasoning, that is for sure. Mind you, this whole thread makes no sense whatsoever so it's not really a big surprise.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Yeah it's just an excuse to complain about 'libruls'.

[The_Dude 1,142]

if you believe gun owners aren't being victimized by non gun owners, then your eyes are shut.

see chicago for more info, if you were really interested in being more enlightened.

In what way are gun owners being victimized by non-gunowners? I abhor using that word because it generally implies some sort of crime is being commited.