Apple under fire for allowing app that 'cures' homosexuality

[mawilson 2,133]

two men sticking their ####### in each others mouth and then stuffing it up each others ####### is sick and demented.

Is it sick and demented when a man sticks his ####### in his wife's mouth and then stuffs it up her ####### (not necessarily in that order)?

[Dan and Judy 614]

on the topic of bestiality, you'll have to discuss that with the person that brought it up.

it is a bit of a stretch to try to make what i said about "adults" to include different species

The Captain is the person that brought that up

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Is it sick and demented when a man sticks his ####### in his wife's mouth and then stuffs it up her ####### (not necessarily in that order)?

Not at all.

[mawilson 2,133]

Not at all.

How come?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The Captain is the person that brought that up

Never mind - I know what Charles is talking about now. It was a thread about a Columbia Professor who was charged with incest for having sex with his adult daughter. Presumably this is not sordid or depraved.

Edited March 24, 2011 by fishdude

[Captain Hammer 113]

I find it pretty absurd when people object to homosexuality based on how grody they think the man putting his wee-wee in the hoo-hoo is. (these are clinical terms btw, I try to stay professional when I'm talking about men putting their wee-wee's in other men's hoo-hoos.) Because I've seen pictures of a lot of the people here on Visa Journey, and while I like a lot of you, I'm sorry but I don't want to see you having sex, no matter how pure and beautiful and filled with double rainbows it may seem to you. For the vast majority of the population let's just say it's good that exhibitionism isn't more popular. So to object on these grounds is the weakest of all possible arguments: "homosexuality is wrong because I have a really good imagination."

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I find it pretty absurd when people object to homosexuality based on how grody they think the man putting his wee-wee in the hoo-hoo is. (these are clinical terms btw, I try to stay professional when I'm talking about men putting their wee-wee's in other men's hoo-hoos.) Because I've seen pictures of a lot of the people here on Visa Journey, and while I like a lot of you, I'm sorry but I don't want to see you having sex, no matter how pure and beautiful and filled with double rainbows it may seem to you. For the vast majority of the population let's just say it's good that exhibitionism isn't more popular. So to object on these grounds is the weakest of all possible arguments: "homosexuality is wrong because I have a really good imagination."

Yeah I don't get that - the aesthetics of sex. Imagination aside - that's surely only important for people who are into some sort of voyeurism, like hiding in hotel closets hoping to catch someone going at it. Given that most people (I hope) don't that - why on Earth should they care? It's not like they're being confronted by extreme close-ups of people's private parts.

Edited March 24, 2011 by fishdude

[Ban Hammer 13,486]

The Captain is the person that brought that up

not unless duncan is also the captain.

Guess it depends on what you're saying it in regards to - homosexuality is one thing, incest, sheep shagging or public masturbation = quite another.

Never mind - I know what Charles is talking about now. It was a thread about a Columbia Professor who was charged with incest for having sex with his adult daughter. Presumably this is not sordid or depraved.

again, consenting adults.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

I don't have any problems with hot looking bi sexual women if that counts for anything.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

again, consenting adults.

Consent is irrelevant to incest - particularly between parents and children.

[Ban Hammer 13,486]

Consent is irrelevant to incest - particularly between parents and children.

not children anymore, in the story all parties concerned are adults.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Is it sick and demented when a man sticks his ####### in his wife's mouth and then stuffs it up her ####### (not necessarily in that order)?

No way.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

not children anymore, in the story all parties concerned are adults.

Consent is irrelevant to incest (legally and morally), particularly between parents and children (regardless of whether the parties are adult or otherwise).

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I don't have any problems with hot looking bi sexual women if that counts for anything.

I think it does.

[Ban Hammer 13,486]

Consent is irrelevant to incest (legally and morally), particularly between parents and children (regardless of whether the parties are adult or otherwise).

not that long ago, consent to homosexual acts was illegal and considered immoral too. which is it, grown adults can or can't make their own decisions about their sexual choices?