Majority of Americans still understand global warming, despite best efforts of Fox

[Zero Sum 305]

Again, call it what you want to. I really don't care.

Its not anyone here but you, John, calling things what they want to call them. Just thought I'd point that out.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

...factual scientific opinion...

You oxymoron, you!

Don't you mean, "Is it written in little red book?"

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Its not anyone here but you, John, calling things what they want to call them. Just thought I'd point that out.

You are trying to bait me and I am not biting. Call it what you want.

[Zero Sum 305]

You oxymoron, you!

Don't you mean, "Is it written in little red book?"

Shhh. I just notice words when written.

You are trying to bait me and I am not biting. Call it what you want.

Well we can start that your premise on climate is not climate to begin with... and that in itself is well-defined fact. Now do you feel not baited?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Zero, it's futile trying to explain science to people who have a 6th Grade understanding of science. Most of these yahoo deniers don't even have a college degree, which explains a lot.

[Zero Sum 305]

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Zero, it's futile trying to explain science to people who have a 6th Grade understanding of science. Most of these yahoo deniers don't even have a college degree, which explains a lot.

This from a guy that draws cartoons for a living. Opps, I mean a failed cartoon artist.

It doesn't matter though. Cry all you want. No cap and tax, no CO2 regulation. That is all that matters.

[Zero Sum 305]

I really wish both of you would stop insulting each other. There really is no need to to this. With factual information, though, John has yet to prove he knows what he is talking about.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

It doesn't matter though. Cry all you want. No cap and tax, no CO2 regulation. That is all that matters.

The Republicans won't be able to simply wipe it away through defunding the EPA.

Edited March 19, 2011 by 8TBVBN

[JohnSmith2007 353]

I really wish both of you would stop insulting each other. There really is no need to to this. With factual information, though, John has yet to prove he knows what he is talking about.

I don't have to prove a thing. I am confident in my opinion and I have no desire to change yours. All I care about is that there is no cap and tax and that the EPA does not regulate CO2. Since I don't believe that man is causing GW my position makes perfect sense. If you don't agree that is also fine with me.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

The Republicans won't be able to simply wipe it away through defunding the EPA.

As long as there is no CO2 regulation or taxes then it is all good.

[Zero Sum 305]

I don't have to prove a thing. I am confident in my opinion and I have no desire to change yours. All I care about is that there is no cap and tax and that the EPA does not regulate CO2. Since I don't believe that man is causing GW my position makes perfect sense. If you don't agree that is also fine with me.

If that's all you care about, then there's no need to use flawed science to prove a point.

Of course not believing in something makes perfect sense- to those that don't believe it. Its called having a closed mind.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

Zero, it's futile trying to explain science to people who have a 6th Grade understanding of science. Most of these yahoo deniers don't even have a college degree, which explains a lot.

no one is denying yahoo, it exists.

http://www.yahoo.com

As long as there is no CO2 regulation or taxes then it is all good.

i think if cali had the same electric rates i have then some there might change their mind about it all.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

If that's all you care about, then there's no need to use flawed science to prove a point.

Of course not believing in something makes perfect sense- to those that don't believe it. Its called having a closed mind.

I keep forgetting you are new here. There have been endless discussions both pro and con about GW. In the end Steven starts bringing out the tin foil hat pics and the flat earth posters and declares that it is "settled science". There is no discussing it with him. So my reaction is to just dismiss him and point out that he has lost. Lost that is, in the sense of there will be no carbon rationing or taxes. I have gotten to my opinion by exstensive reading on the subject. I truly doubt that man has any effect on the earths temps. If you would like to have that debate I am willing but at the same time I know that Steven will step in and start in with the tin foil hat pics again. It makes any debate here impossible.

[Zero Sum 305]

I keep forgetting you are new here. There have been endless discussions both pro and con about GW. In the end Steven starts bringing out the tin foil hat pics and the flat earth posters and declares that it is "settled science". There is no discussing it with him. So my reaction is to just dismiss him and point out that he has lost. Lost that is, in the sense of there will be no carbon rationing or taxes. I have gotten to my opinion by exstensive reading on the subject. I truly doubt that man has any effect on the earths temps. If you would like to have that debate I am willing but at the same time I know that Steven will step in and start in with the tin foil hat pics again. It makes any debate here impossible.

I applaud this post. Now you are saying something different- you doubt something. That is a far cry from taking a hard position that is contrary to a very convincing body of evidence based on more than just opinions and interpretations.