Critics on right say Palin is 'becoming Al Sharpton, Alaska edition'

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

It's true most prostitutes are not physically fit

I knew that.

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

of course you did

[Peikko 1,575]

I am not too good at explaining it actually, but Ron will fill you in. He explains very well how prostitution is disrespectful of women, I have seen him do it many times. I believe him.

I AM pro-choice and I think a woman ought to be able to choose to be a prostitute, even legally, but I agree with Ron that it is disresectful and therefore do not use them. Besides, I am married and my wife is HOT and she doesn't cost me any LESS if I also go to prostitutes so...why would I? But mostly it is because I respect women. Mostly. And partially because a lot of prostitutes are kind of, well...chunky.

How is it disrespectful? Someone else may well have good reasons for believing it is, but what are YOUR reasons for saying that? You said it so either you have a good reason or you are talking ######.

Yes, you are married and at the moment your wife is hot to you, but that's not going to last IF your criteria for being hot is skin deep, literally again making your statement that you respect women completely void. You constantly demonstrate that you don't respect women at all. Women are not simply vessels for men to have sex with.

Oh, and when you procure a prostitute, you have the choice as to which prostitute you choose, that's the beauty of it so your mostly/partially rational is moot.

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

High class hookers are expensive - ask Charlie Sheen

[Peikko 1,575]

so all we need to do is go to legal prostitutes that regularly test, use common sense with their choice of clients (does that mean they take American Express?) and insist on proper use of condoms.

And NO threesomes

OK, got it.

If you practiced what you preached, yes you would. If you believe the proper relationship between a man and a woman is the procurement of sex for the man in exchange for goods for the women, which IS what you and why_me said, then yes using a prostitute would be the most honest way to do that.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

so all we need to do is go to legal prostitutes that regularly test, use common sense with their choice of clients (does that mean they take American Express?) and insist on proper use of condoms.

And NO threesomes

OK, got it.

No threesomes ??? Are you serious ?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

How is it disrespectful? Someone else may well have good reasons for believing it is, but what are YOUR reasons for saying that? You said it so either you have a good reason or you are talking ######.

Yes, you are married and at the moment your wife is hot to you, but that's not going to last IF your criteria for being hot is skin deep, literally again making your statement that you respect women completely void. You constantly demonstrate that you don't respect women at all. Women are not simply vessels for men to have sex with.

Oh, and when you procure a prostitute, you have the choice as to which prostitute you choose, that's the beauty of it so your mostly/partially rational is moot.

I like Ron's reasons. I just forget what they were, but they were good. Promise.

I really do not know the procedure when procuring a prostitute. Thanks anyway. The whole thing sounds disrepectful to women. Kinda like procuring meat or something. ewwww.

[Peikko 1,575]

High class hookers are expensive - ask Charlie Sheen

So they should be but maintaining a wife isn't cheap, unless you are one of those disgusting creatures that procures a wife to use for sex and house keeping. That's the lowest of the low.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

No threesomes ??? Are you serious ?

That was Madame Cleo, not me. Being married doesn't mean you can't have threesomes.

So they should be but maintaining a wife isn't cheap, unless you are one of those disgusting creatures that procures a wife to use for sex and house keeping. That's the lowest of the low.

Are they cheaper if they just do sex and housekeeping?

If you practiced what you preached, yes you would. If you believe the proper relationship between a man and a woman is the procurement of sex for the man in exchange for goods for the women, which IS what you and why_me said, then yes using a prostitute would be the most honest way to do that.

I don't agree.

[Peikko 1,575]

I like Ron's reasons. I just forget what they were, but they were good. Promise.

I really do not know the procedure when procuring a prostitute. Thanks anyway. The whole thing sounds disrepectful to women. Kinda like procuring meat or something. ewwww.

You like something, but can't remember what it was but I am to trust you that it's good? It sounds disrespectful because it's a transaction? How are transactions disrespectful?

[Peikko 1,575]

I don't agree.

Clearly. You'd rather buy a wife than a prostitute, you aren't sure what the difference is but you're sure buying a wife is more respectful.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Clearly. You'd rather buy a wife than a prostitute, you aren't sure what the difference is but you're sure buying a wife is more respectful.

MC please don't take offense to this post because there's none intended...but I wouldn't be surprised at all after reading your post on here that you don't have your ol man's testies in a jar somewhere. It's pretty obvious who wears the pants around your house.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

You like something, but can't remember what it was but I am to trust you that it's good? It sounds disrespectful because it's a transaction? How are transactions disrespectful?

Ron will explain. You don't have to take my word for it.

Transactions are not a problem. I never said transactions were disrepectful, except for....

RON! Please explain to MC how prostitution is disrespectful to women.

MC please don't take offense to this post because there's none intended...but I wouldn't be surprised at all after reading your post on here that you don't have your ol man's testies in a jar somewhere. It's pretty obvious who wears the pants around your house.

it is possible the testes are the only thing(s) left.

Clearly. You'd rather buy a wife than a prostitute, you aren't sure what the difference is but you're sure buying a wife is more respectful.

Yes! That was it! That was what Ron said. Something about long term committment and all that. Buying vs. renting.

Edited March 16, 2011 by Gary and Alla

[Peikko 1,575]

MC please don't take offense to this post because there's none intended...but I wouldn't be surprised at all after reading your post on here that you don't have your ol man's testies in a jar somewhere. It's pretty obvious who wears the pants around your house.

Relationships do not have to involve domination and subjugation. Sometimes, people can actually have mutual respect for each other. Both can have strong personalities, opinions and wills and yet get along just dandy. I would think that's something you are not familiar with, but trust me, it's both possible and extremely exhilarating.

[Peikko 1,575]

Ron will explain. You don't have to take my word for it.

Transactions are not a problem. I never said transactions were disrepectful, except for....

RON! Please explain to MC how prostitution is disrespectful to women.

it is possible the testes are the only thing(s) left.

Yes! That was it! That was what Ron said. Something about long term committment and all that. Buying vs. renting.

For someone who is extremely driven by how others perceive them to be, you are not doing yourself any favours. I'd quit while you are this far behind if I were you