Jump to content
I AM NOT THAT GUY

All the drama was for naught: Wisconsin Senate Passes Bill

 Share

45 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Walker/West 2012!

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

The lone Democrat present on the conference committee, Rep. Tony Barca, shouted that the surprise meeting was a violation of the state's open meetings law but Republicans voted over his objections.

:lol:

Sucks when your silly little tricks backfire, doesn't it?

Yes, keep telling yourself it's those big, ugly unions that are destroying America

They sure as hell destroyed Detroit.

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline

I thought is was the manufacture of ####### cars that doomed the Detroit car makers to closing down those factories; hence, the loss of employment. Its a real crapfest when we misrepresent unions as responsible for something they're not. Were the unions responsible for designing, procuring parts, and authorizing raw material use for the factories? I think now. More like it was those that now continue to try to bust unions that were only interested in maximizing their profit margin could be to blame, IF we want to make silly, one track assumptions in our arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

I thought is was the manufacture of ####### cars that doomed the Detroit car makers to closing down those factories; hence, the loss of employment. Its a real crapfest when we misrepresent unions as responsible for something they're not. Were the unions responsible for designing, procuring parts, and authorizing raw material use for the factories? I think now. More like it was those that now continue to try to bust unions that were only interested in maximizing their profit margin could be to blame, IF we want to make silly, one track assumptions in our arguments.

No, Zero. It wasn't GM's fault that they adopted a different corporate model than their Japanese and German competitors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline

Nope - the cars were not the problem.

I see. Thanks. It must have been those bloodthirsty union employees, making cars that couldn't compete. Lets forget about corporate decision-making. They didn't control the factories after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

I see. Thanks. It must have been those bloodthirsty union employees, making cars that couldn't compete. Lets forget about corporate decision-making. They didn't control the factories after all.

Steve Rattner, the Obama administration’s former "car czar" who has a book out about the

bailing out of General Motors and Chrysler, gives an interesting summary of his first

impressions of Detroit to Peter Lattman in the New York Times:

So, for example, I found that the culture in Detroit, and at General Motors in

particular, was even more bureaucratic and more stultified than what I would have guessed

before I got there. The financial controls were far weaker than anything I would’ve

imagined before I got there. On the positive side, GM had better projects than I would’ve

imagined and it had also brought its manufacturing efficiency to a much higher level than

I would’ve predicted.

That can be summarised as: GM was a terrible company making surprisingly good cars. Or:

Detroit itself was in a bad way, whereas its manufacturing plants were healthy.

We shall see whether the “new GM” proves more energetic and disciplined in the long-term

but this could be an argument for moving the headquarters of the Big Three out of Detroit

and its surrounding areas, much as Boeing moved from Seattle to Chicago 10 years ago.

If the fundamental problem is the ingrained corporate culture at HQ, that is a reason to

blow it up and move somewhere else entirely. Alan Mulally, Ford’s chief executive, is a

former executive of Boeing, incidentally.

link

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline

Steve Rattner, the Obama administration’s former "car czar" who has a book out about the

bailing out of General Motors and Chrysler, gives an interesting summary of his first

impressions of Detroit to Peter Lattman in the New York Times:

That can be summarised as: GM was a terrible company making surprisingly good cars. Or:

Detroit itself was in a bad way, whereas its manufacturing plants were healthy.

We shall see whether the “new GM” proves more energetic and disciplined in the long-term

but this could be an argument for moving the headquarters of the Big Three out of Detroit

and its surrounding areas, much as Boeing moved from Seattle to Chicago 10 years ago.

If the fundamental problem is the ingrained corporate culture at HQ, that is a reason to

blow it up and move somewhere else entirely. Alan Mulally, Ford’s chief executive, is a

former executive of Boeing, incidentally.

link

That's an excellent account. Thanks again.

You mean, by not offering an unsustainable defined benefits plan for their employees?

What are the Germans or Japanese offering their employees? Being an issue of competitiveness...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

I would say labor played 20% of the role in detroits decline, same with management. If you really want to know why the US auto industry suffered in the 80s/90s/00s its because of the Japanese. They simply were better at making automobiles and they had newer facilities to manufacture them in.

Part of this is because of World War 2. The US was the manufacturing HQ for the world from the 1940s-1960s because it was the only manufacturer that hadn't been bombed to rubble...everyone else was rebuilding. This was an advantage for a while, but a handicap later on as Germany/Japan etc. built modern facilities and the US was paying the costs of retooling antiquated ones. I think the 80s were the turning point for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

PS. Either the republicans of wisconsin are morons for taking so long to find this loophole, or they were afraid their true intentions would be revealed as Steven said, and simply lost patience. Take your pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Rattner, the Obama administration’s former "car czar" who has a book out about the

bailing out of General Motors and Chrysler, gives an interesting summary of his first

impressions of Detroit to Peter Lattman in the New York Times:

That can be summarised as: GM was a terrible company making surprisingly good cars. Or:

Detroit itself was in a bad way, whereas its manufacturing plants were healthy.

We shall see whether the “new GM” proves more energetic and disciplined in the long-term

but this could be an argument for moving the headquarters of the Big Three out of Detroit

and its surrounding areas, much as Boeing moved from Seattle to Chicago 10 years ago.

If the fundamental problem is the ingrained corporate culture at HQ, that is a reason to

blow it up and move somewhere else entirely. Alan Mulally, Ford’s chief executive, is a

former executive of Boeing, incidentally.

link

I think its more complicated than that.

Management at the big three did agree to the union contracts in the end, but I think they did so at a time when it was possible to honor them.

But the market changed, as it always does, the Japanese and Germans stared offering products in the US market that were better for roughly the same cost. Now, you can either improve your quality to compete, which requires culture changes that didn't happen very easily at any level of the company, or drop your price to place your products at a market point they actually belonged in, which they could not do because of the union agreements they made in the past.

There is always a market for lower quality products if the are priced appropriately.

PS. Either the republicans of wisconsin are morons for taking so long to find this loophole, or they were afraid their true intentions would be revealed as Steven said, and simply lost patience. Take your pick.

How long before Wisconsin joins Russia in making democracy a farce.

keTiiDCjGVo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...