declaration of having met

[cananner 2]

My fiance and I met last year, visited each other twice during 2010, and then in December I went to stay with him for a few months. So I've been in the US for 3 months now and am planning to leave before the 6 months are up (as a Canadian, I can be in the US for 6 months out of a year with no visa. They don't give you an I-94 either).

In our declaration, I described both short visits and explained my current visit. It ends with:

"It is now March 5th, 2011. Since [cananner], as a Canadian visitor, can only be in the United States for 6 months out of a year, she will be returning to Montreal before May, so that she does not overstay her US visit."

I guess I'm just paranoid that whoever reviews our case will read that and be like "NO RETURN TICKET?!" even though we've stated that I'm fully aware that I can't just hang out in the US for an unlimited time. Is what I've written okay?

[Anh map 2,098]

You just need to show that you've met face to face within the past two years.

[max+patricia 24]

I don't think it's even necessary. USCIS likely puts more priority on ensuring that you two have actually met. My fiancee was here in the US when I filed her I-129F and all I added to our "having met in the last 2 years" paper was a short sentence saying that she was currently here on a tourist visa and had arrived on X date.

[Sunny123 44]

My fiance and I met last year, visited each other twice during 2010, and then in December I went to stay with him for a few months. So I've been in the US for 3 months now and am planning to leave before the 6 months are up (as a Canadian, I can be in the US for 6 months out of a year with no visa. They don't give you an I-94 either).

In our declaration, I described both short visits and explained my current visit. It ends with:

"It is now March 5th, 2011. Since [cananner], as a Canadian visitor, can only be in the United States for 6 months out of a year, she will be returning to Montreal before May, so that she does not overstay her US visit."

I guess I'm just paranoid that whoever reviews our case will read that and be like "NO RETURN TICKET?!" even though we've stated that I'm fully aware that I can't just hang out in the US for an unlimited time. Is what I've written okay?

Get a stamp on your way out of the US. You need to irrefutable evidence that you were in the united states or that they were in Canada with with you. I sent in my application but didn't have a copy of a boarding pass for flight or a copy of a passport stamp to show were in the eachother's countries. But here's also something that a friend of my did when her fiance was in the country they went to a land mark had their picture taken with the current news paper.

Edited March 6, 2011 by Sunny123

[NotYourPsycho 0]

Get a stamp on your way out of the US. You need to irrefutable evidence that you were in the united states or that they were in Canada with with you. I sent in my application but didn't have a copy of a boarding pass for flight or a copy of a passport stamp to show were in the eachother's countries. But here's also something that a friend of my did when her fiance was in the country they went to a land mark had their picture taken with the current news paper.

I have 0 stamps from crossing the border to Canada over 2 times a month for the past year and a half. I have asked a few times, and they don't. Best thing is to keep receipts from gas/purchases on both sides and keep a list to match.

Good luck!!

[pushbrk 13,178]

My fiance and I met last year, visited each other twice during 2010, and then in December I went to stay with him for a few months. So I've been in the US for 3 months now and am planning to leave before the 6 months are up (as a Canadian, I can be in the US for 6 months out of a year with no visa. They don't give you an I-94 either).

In our declaration, I described both short visits and explained my current visit. It ends with:

"It is now March 5th, 2011. Since [cananner], as a Canadian visitor, can only be in the United States for 6 months out of a year, she will be returning to Montreal before May, so that she does not overstay her US visit."

I guess I'm just paranoid that whoever reviews our case will read that and be like "NO RETURN TICKET?!" even though we've stated that I'm fully aware that I can't just hang out in the US for an unlimited time. Is what I've written okay?

Your statement is fine. Now concentrate on providing primary evidence that she is/was here. Since there won't be passport stamps, airline boarding passes, in country receipts for her credit card purchases or proof of life photo will do.