Jump to content

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

By DAMIAN PALETTA

The U.S. government has 15 different agencies overseeing food-safety laws, more than 20 separate programs to help the homeless and 80 programs for economic development.

These are a few of the findings in a massive study of overlapping and duplicative programs that cost taxpayers billions of dollars each year, according to the Government Accountability Office.

A report from the nonpartisan GAO, to be released Tuesday, compiles a list of redundant and potentially ineffective federal programs, and it could serve as a template for lawmakers in both parties as they move to cut federal spending and consolidate programs to reduce the deficit. Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.), who pushed for the report, estimated it identifies between $100 billion and $200 billion in duplicative spending. The GAO didn't put a figure on the spending overlap.

The GAO examined numerous federal agencies, including the departments of defense, agriculture and housing and urban development, and pointed to instances where different arms of the government should be coordinating or consolidating efforts to save taxpayers' money.

The agency found 82 federal programs to improve teacher quality; 80 to help disadvantaged people with transportation; 47 for job training and employment; and 56 to help people understand finances, according to a draft of the report reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Instances of ineffective and unfocused federal programs can lead to a mishmash of occasionally arbitrary policies and rules, the report said. It recommends merging or consolidating a number of programs to both save money and make the government more efficient.

"Reducing or eliminating duplication, overlap, or fragmentation could potentially save billions of tax dollars annually and help agencies provide more efficient and effective services," the report said.

There have been multiple efforts to cull the number of federal programs in recent years, but they often run into opposition from lawmakers in both parties who rush to defend individual spending provisions. In fact, GAO's recommendations are often ignored or postponed by federal agencies and lawmakers, particularly when they could require difficult political votes.

The report says policy makers should consider creating a single food-safety agency because of a number of redundancies. The Food and Drug Administration makes sure that chicken eggs are "safe, wholesome, and properly labeled" while a division of the Department of Agriculture "is responsible for the safety of eggs processed into egg products."

Spokespeople for the Department of Agriculture and FDA pointed to the Obama administration's creation of the Food Safety Working Group, which works to better coordinate the government's regulators.

The report says there are 18 federal programs that spent a combined $62.5 billion in 2008 on food and nutrition assistance, but little is known about the effectiveness of 11 of these programs because they haven't been well studied.

The report took particular aim at government funding for surface transportation, including the building of roads and other projects, which the administration has made a major part of its push to update the country's infrastructure.

The report said five divisions within the Department of Transportation account for 100 different programs that fund things like highways, rail projects and safety programs.

One program that funnels transportation funds to the states "functions as a cash-transfer general-purpose grant program, rather than as a tool for pursuing a cohesive national transportation policy," the report said. Similarly, it chided the government over encouraging federal agencies to purchase plug-in hybrid vehicles while having policies that agencies reduce electricity consumption. It said government agencies have purchased numerous vehicles that run on alternative fuels only to find many gas stations don't sell alternative fuels. This has led government agencies to turn around and request waivers so they didn't have to use alternative fuels.

A spokesperson for the Department of Transportation said the president's budget for fiscal year 2012 "proposes to cut waste, inefficiency and bureaucracy by consolidating over 55 separate highway programs into five core programs, and by merging six transit programs into two programs."

On teacher quality, the report identified 82 programs that often have similar descriptions and goals and are spread across 10 federal agencies, including the Department of Education, the Department of Energy and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Nine of these programs are linked to science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Fifty-three of the programs are relatively small, receiving $50 million or less, "and many have their own separate administrative processes."

The GAO highlighted 80 different economic development programs at the Department of Commerce, HUD, Department of Agriculture and Small Business Administration, that spent a combined $6.5 billion last year and often overlapped. For example, the four agencies combined to have 52 different programs that fund "entrepreneurial efforts," 35 programs for infrastructure, and 26 programs for telecommunications. It said 60% of the programs fund only one or two activities, making them "the most likely to overlap because many of them can only fund the same limited types of activities."

Dept. of Overlap: GAO Finds Hundreds of Duplicative Programs The report took aim at several military programs, which could prove thorny because many lawmakers from both parties are wary to cut defense spending. It said there were 130,000 military and government medical professionals, 59 Defense Department hospitals and hundreds of clinics that could benefit from consolidating administrative, management and clinical functions.

For example, it said the government "may have developed duplicate" programs to counter improvised explosive devices, with the Marine Corps and the Army paying to develop similar "mine rollers." The Marine mine roller costs $85,000, and the Army mine roller costs $77,000 to $225,000. "Officials disagree about which system is most effective, and [the Pentagon] has not conducted comparative testing and evaluation of the two systems," the report said. The Pentagon didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

The GAO study was required by a provision inserted by Sen. Coburn into a law that raised the federal borrowing limit last year. This report is the first produced in response to the provision.

Write to Damian Paletta at damian.paletta@wsj.com http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703749504576172942399165436.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5

If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Lesotho
Timeline
Posted

I'm sure some democrats will be here shortly screaming about the job losses that would result if we cut duplicate spending!

The dems won't even agree to a measly 4 billion in cuts that Obama already endorsed. The lack of responsibility in congress has gone way beyond incompetence. We need to be cutting hundreds of billions each year and we can't even get this token set of cuts. Unreal.

Republicans Ease Demands in Effort to Avert Government Shutdown

February 26, 2011, 12:04 AM EST

By Brian Faler

Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. House Republicans agreed yesterday to temporarily ease some demands for cuts in federal spending, a move Senate Democrats said “encouraged” them as the two sides work to avert a government shutdown next week.

House Republicans proposed a two-week spending bill that would make $4 billion in cuts through a handful of reductions already backed by President Barack Obama and by eliminating unspent funds for legislative pet projects. A failure to enact a new plan by March 4, when current spending authority expires, would cause a shutdown.

The Republicans dropped, at least for now, demands for cuts in a number of government programs, proposing instead to keep most federal agencies at current budget levels through March 18. Democrats wouldn’t say whether they will accept the plan, though they had kinder words for yesterday’s action than for earlier Republican proposals they rejected.

“We are encouraged to hear that Republicans are abandoning their demands for extreme measures like cuts to border security, cancer research and food safety inspectors,” Jon Summers, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said in a statement.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, said in a statement that the bill “includes common-sense spending cuts to responsibly keep the government running for the next two weeks and avoid a shutdown.”

Reid, a Nevada Democrat, had sought a 30-day extension at current spending levels. Summers said the Republicans’ two-week plan “sounds like a modified version of what Democrats were talking about” to allow time to prepare a longer-term measure that would fund the government through Sept. 30, the end of the 2011 fiscal year.

Highway, Election Spending

The House Republican proposal would make $1.24 billion in reductions, including a $650 million cut in highway spending, $75 million less for election-assistance grants to states and a $29 million reduction in a broadband loan program. It would end four Department of Education programs as proposed in Obama’s budget request earlier this month.

The measure also would rescind $2.7 billion from accounts lawmakers used to fund their pet projects -- a practice, known as earmarking, that both parties say they have abandoned.

Even if lawmakers are able to avoid a shutdown next week, they must bridge large differences over how much to spend for the remainder of the fiscal year.

The House last week passed legislation that would cut $61 billion in spending this year by eliminating more than 100 programs and cutting hundreds of others. Senate Democrats have rejected those cuts, saying they would threaten the economic recovery. Even so, Democrats have said they will seek additional cuts.

‘Resolve Our Differences’

“I have talked to members of the Republican leadership, and I am hopeful we can resolve our differences on a long-term measure quickly so that we are not forced to continue funding the government in disruptive two-week increments that undermine efficiency,” Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the second-ranking House Democrat, said in a statement.

“We welcome the news that they are beginning to embrace the need to cut spending,” Cantor said. “But I’d caution my Senate Democrat colleagues to make sure that their cuts are significant and serious spending reduction proposals, not just minor efforts to trim around the edges.”

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-02-26/republicans-ease-demands-in-effort-to-avert-government-shutdown.html

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

I'm sure some democrats will be here shortly screaming about the job losses that would result if we cut duplicate spending!

:bonk: you beat me to it!

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...