got denied after 3 yrs and 8 months of waiting..

[eagerly 2]

I have provided them with all the evidences that will prove I am not a risk to my wife, they denied us for reason that they believe I will be of risk to my wife in the future...what is then their proof that I will? Their reasoning was not elaborated further, it's because no one can tell what is to happen in the future but only GOD. Not fair as well to be asking us for evidences but on their end they cant provide one.

I think the question is ...how are we able to address the situation? Is it enough to write in blogs? Does USCIS read blogs? Is meeting our Congressman or Senator do us good? Ombudsman? Who could come up with a solution to look into how they are dealing this type of cases. I am guessing they know whats happening...but do they really care? It would be a politicalsuicide to support us...the rules must be reviewed and again my question is how and what does it take to have our concerns heard..who will HELP US let them understand?

[Deputy Purple 1,294]

I have provided them with all the evidences that will prove I am not a risk to my wife, they denied us for reason that they believe I will be of risk to my wife in the future...what is then their proof that I will? Their reasoning was not elaborated further, it's because no one can tell what is to happen in the future but only GOD. Not fair as well to be asking us for evidences but on their end they cant provide one.

I think the question is ...how are we able to address the situation? Is it enough to write in blogs? Does USCIS read blogs? Is meeting our Congressman or Senator do us good? Ombudsman? Who could come up with a solution to look into how they are dealing this type of cases. I am guessing they know whats happening...but do they really care? It would be a politicalsuicide to support us...the rules must be reviewed and again my question is how and what does it take to have our concerns heard..who will HELP US let them understand?

File a federal lawsuit appealing the decision and challenging them to prove that you will be a threat to your wife.

Maybe contact the ACLU in your area.

[eagerly 2]

Thanks for your reply Bob 4 Anna..but who will ever win with the government? Even the Arizona governor lost in the case re proof of someone staying in Arizona legally. This will be my last post on this thread..sorry to the OP and visa journey administrator for using this thread.

File a federal lawsuit appealing the decision and challenging them to prove that you will be a threat to your wife.

Maybe contact the ACLU in your area.

[Deputy Purple 1,294]

Thanks for your reply Bob 4 Anna..but who will ever win with the government? Even the Arizona governor lost in the case re proof of someone staying in Arizona legally. This will be my last post on this thread..sorry to the OP and visa journey administrator for using this thread.

If nobody will press the fight then there will never be a victory.

I would fight to be with my wife all the way to the Supreme Court.

I would contact every organisation I could find including ACLU, and regional Legal Rights Agencies for assistance in the fight.

[lemmony 1]

Tell that to your senator, it was the US government that passed this law, it has good intentions to protect unsuspecting immigrants from US citizen sexual preditors. Do the crime then suffer the consequences. I have no sympathy for sexual predators

Example of what could happen before the law.

http://candleforlove...showtopic=18398 (Did the visa so that can continue their sex habit on the step child.)

Be careful of the ones pointing the fingers.While over 800,000 American citizens are listed under the sexual offenders list for minor things like peeing in public and concetual sex the real pervs are making the laws,staying free and racking the cash.....considering the people responsible for the law have very uhm shall we say sorted lives what do you expect? John Walsh admitted to treatment as an admitted sexual predator Congressman Mark Foley busted sexting and trying to molest little boys in the congress building...Lundsford caught with computers full of kiddie porn, Lundsfords son nabbed for child molestation in public in a mall..multiple times.. I am afraid to ask the history of others. unfortunately the list goes on..geesh...

Edited October 10, 2011 by lemmony

[NigeriaorBust 4,087]

By defination child molesters are NOT having consentual sex. They are raping someone that doesn't have the legal capacity to say yes. They may know how to utter the word and even undress but legally they are not able to consent to sex, to vote, to drink and frequently are too young to drive a car.

[Deputy Purple 1,294]

By defination child molesters are NOT having consentual sex. They are raping someone that doesn't have the legal capacity to say yes. They may know how to utter the word and even undress but legally they are not able to consent to sex, to vote, to drink and frequently are too young to drive a car.

And exactly what are you adding to this conversation?

Don't ignore inconvenient facts. It's a fact that the US has failed on EVERY FRONT to do anything real or effective protecting children (or anyone) from sex offenses.

The SOR (Sex Offender Registry) is worthless because it contains people convicted of Peeing in an alley behind a bar, skinny dipping, walking from their own bathroom to their own bedroom naked after a shower whilst a neighbor kid was peeking into their window, 18 year old having sex with 16/17 year old girlfriend, unlawful restraint (Yes in Illinois Unlawful restraint conviction gets you on the registry).

The Registry and current laws have parents looking at the stranger down the street but "Stranger Danger" is in fact the lowest level of threat to our kids despite the fact that those are the cases that get all of the press. 90% of Child Sex Offenses are committed by relatives or close trusted family friends.

If the Registry was working then please enlighten me as to why over 90% of Sex Crime arrests are of people who have no previous sex crime record?

[evli1966 88]

And exactly what are you adding to this conversation?

Don't ignore inconvenient facts. It's a fact that the US has failed on EVERY FRONT to do anything real or effective protecting children (or anyone) from sex offenses.

The SOR (Sex Offender Registry) is worthless because it contains people convicted of Peeing in an alley behind a bar, skinny dipping, walking from their own bathroom to their own bedroom naked after a shower whilst a neighbor kid was peeking into their window, 18 year old having sex with 16/17 year old girlfriend, unlawful restraint (Yes in Illinois Unlawful restraint conviction gets you on the registry).

The Registry and current laws have parents looking at the stranger down the street but "Stranger Danger" is in fact the lowest level of threat to our kids despite the fact that those are the cases that get all of the press. 90% of Child Sex Offenses are committed by relatives or close trusted family friends.

If the Registry was working then please enlighten me as to why over 90% of Sex Crime arrests are of people who have no previous sex crime record?

AMEN