President Bush assassinated in new TV docudrama

[*Robert* 2]

the so called "war on terror"....

The so-called war on terror is being resuscitated as I type this. Rummy and W have started the CPR the last couple of days. It ain't dead - remember, it never is dead around election time.

Be afraid....

Boo!

yeah, I was listening to it while we were eating, and I almost threw up my food! Why does he EVEN bother?!!!

Poor George... he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!!!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

the so called "war on terror"....

The so-called war on terror is being resuscitated as I type this. Rummy and W have started the CPR the last couple of days. It ain't dead - remember, it never is dead around election time.

Be afraid....

Boo!

yeah, I was listening to it while we were eating, and I almost threw up my food! Why does he EVEN bother?!!!

Poor George... he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!!!

I can't believe that some people will actually buy back into all this "we will eventually win in Iraq" and "let's fight them over there" and "the war on terror" #######. Holy shite, what's it gonna take for the last souls to fcuking wake up and smell the coffee? Rove's propaganda machine is being warmed back up. It'll be entertaining for sure. Noticed that there were over 150 casualties in Baghdad in a number of attacks within a just a 30min window today while W was telling us that we're winning? Winning what, anyways? The insurgency was in it's last throes many months ago. The Veep said so. Bunch of fcuking idiots in the White House.

Edited September 1, 2006 by ET-US2004

[*Robert* 2]

the so called "war on terror"....

The so-called war on terror is being resuscitated as I type this. Rummy and W have started the CPR the last couple of days. It ain't dead - remember, it never is dead around election time.

Be afraid....

Boo!

yeah, I was listening to it while we were eating, and I almost threw up my food! Why does he EVEN bother?!!!

Poor George... he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!!!

I can't believe that some people will actually buy back into all this "we will eventually win in Iraq" and "let's fight them over there" and "the war on terror" #######. Holy shite, what's it gonna take for the last souls to fcuking wake up and smell the coffee? Rove's propaganda machine is being warmed back up. It'll be entertaining for sure. Noticed that there were over 150 casualties in Baghdad in a number of attacks within a just a 30min window today while W was telling us that we're winning? Winning what, anyways? The insurgency was in it's last throes many months ago. The Veep said so. Bunch of fcuking idiots in the White House.

You got that right... and yet the number of troops on the ground continue to increase...

things that make you go...

hmmmmmmm

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

the so called "war on terror"....

The so-called war on terror is being resuscitated as I type this. Rummy and W have started the CPR the last couple of days. It ain't dead - remember, it never is dead around election time.

Be afraid....

Boo!

yeah, I was listening to it while we were eating, and I almost threw up my food! Why does he EVEN bother?!!!

Poor George... he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!!!

I can't believe that some people will actually buy back into all this "we will eventually win in Iraq" and "let's fight them over there" and "the war on terror" #######. Holy shite, what's it gonna take for the last souls to fcuking wake up and smell the coffee? Rove's propaganda machine is being warmed back up. It'll be entertaining for sure. Noticed that there were over 150 casualties in Baghdad in a number of attacks within a just a 30min window today while W was telling us that we're winning? Winning what, anyways? The insurgency was in it's last throes many months ago. The Veep said so. Bunch of fcuking idiots in the White House.

You got that right... and yet the number of troops on the ground continue to increase...

That's because we did not send sufficient troops to handle all the flowers. Remember the flowers?

[*Robert* 2]

Hey Reinhard, you watching the game?!

If not... you need to tune to the travel channel, and watch "Florida's Top 10 Beaches"!!!

Some hot looking bikinis!!!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

If not... you need to tune to the travel channel, and watch "Florida's Top 10 Beaches"!!!

There are more than 10 top biatches in Florida.

[incanada1234 0]

I wouldn't mind this docudrama so much if, to be fair, Hillary Clinton was assassinated at the same time.

[Sinergy 3]

Yeah, gross. If Bush died, we'd have Cheney and he'd probably be worse.

We already have Cheney. Had him since 2001. Or do you believe Dubya is really running the show?

Neither Dubya or Cheney is running the show. Dubya is busy reading Curious George books (his name is in it, he thinks its cool) while Cheney holds them, turning the pages, while the both of them sit confused on how to read. While other people sit and think of how to run the country, writing out lil speaches in which they think will make dubya look and sound smart, when in reality hes making his speach and still thinking of his book at home at which hes still stuck on the same word he couldnt figure out the night before.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

the so called "war on terror"....

The so-called war on terror is being resuscitated as I type this. Rummy and W have started the CPR the last couple of days. It ain't dead - remember, it never is dead around election time.

Be afraid....

Boo!

yeah, I was listening to it while we were eating, and I almost threw up my food! Why does he EVEN bother?!!!

Poor George... he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!!!

I can't believe that some people will actually buy back into all this "we will eventually win in Iraq" and "let's fight them over there" and "the war on terror" #######. Holy shite, what's it gonna take for the last souls to fcuking wake up and smell the coffee? Rove's propaganda machine is being warmed back up. It'll be entertaining for sure. Noticed that there were over 150 casualties in Baghdad in a number of attacks within a just a 30min window today while W was telling us that we're winning? Winning what, anyways? The insurgency was in it's last throes many months ago. The Veep said so. Bunch of fcuking idiots in the White House.

Terror.

Indeed. Not to mention its not clear how we are winning, or indeed what we are winning - because its equally unclear what the goal of this "war on terror" is. With Iraq not having any direct link to 9/11 and US national security threats - people already suspect that this is simply a new justification for plain, old fashioned imperialist expansion.

9/11 just gave the president carte blanche to knock over all the "ant-hills" he doesn't like, regardless of whether or not they are involved in any actual terrorism.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Indeed. Not to mention its not clear how we are winning, or indeed what we are winning - because its equally unclear what the goal of this "war on terror" is. With Iraq not having any direct link to 9/11 and US national security threats - people already suspect that this is simply a new justification for plain, old fashioned imperialist expansion.

9/11 just gave the president carte blanche to knock over all the "ant-hills" he doesn't like, regardless of whether or not they are involved in any actual terrorism.

You weren't briefed? The object of the 'war on terror' is to rid the world of all terrorists - kill them all before they can breed anymore. Then we can go back to occupying countries for their natural resources or paying off governments in name of American democracy. King George III would be so proud.

Edited September 3, 2006 by Steven_and_Jinky

[*Robert* 2]

Indeed. Not to mention its not clear how we are winning, or indeed what we are winning - because its equally unclear what the goal of this "war on terror" is. With Iraq not having any direct link to 9/11 and US national security threats - people already suspect that this is simply a new justification for plain, old fashioned imperialist expansion.

9/11 just gave the president carte blanche to knock over all the "ant-hills" he doesn't like, regardless of whether or not they are involved in any actual terrorism.

You weren't briefed? The object of the 'war on terror' is to rid the world of all terrorists - kill them all before they can breed anymore. Then we can go back to occupying countries for their natural resources or paying off governments in name of American democracy. King George III would be so proud.

Right on!!!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Indeed. Not to mention its not clear how we are winning, or indeed what we are winning - because its equally unclear what the goal of this "war on terror" is. With Iraq not having any direct link to 9/11 and US national security threats - people already suspect that this is simply a new justification for plain, old fashioned imperialist expansion.

9/11 just gave the president carte blanche to knock over all the "ant-hills" he doesn't like, regardless of whether or not they are involved in any actual terrorism.

You weren't briefed? The object of the 'war on terror' is to rid the world of all terrorists - kill them all before they can breed anymore. Then we can go back to occupying countries for their natural resources or paying off governments in name of American democracy. King George III would be so proud.

Indeed. Just makes you wonder though - based on say the profiling thread is it actually terrorism we oppose or merely islamic extremism?

From a linguistic point of view the concept of a "war on terror" is completely ludicrous, makes me cringe everytime I hear it. War on terrorism - sure, but war on terror? How do you declare war on a vague emotion?

I mean the emperor Caligula supposedly declared war on the sea....

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I mean the emperor Caligula supposedly declared war on the sea....

Bush's war on terror is like that: An attempt to dig a hole in the water.

Wonder if he'll ever figure out that it's a futile undertaking...

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Indeed. Not to mention its not clear how we are winning, or indeed what we are winning - because its equally unclear what the goal of this "war on terror" is. With Iraq not having any direct link to 9/11 and US national security threats - people already suspect that this is simply a new justification for plain, old fashioned imperialist expansion.

9/11 just gave the president carte blanche to knock over all the "ant-hills" he doesn't like, regardless of whether or not they are involved in any actual terrorism.

You weren't briefed? The object of the 'war on terror' is to rid the world of all terrorists - kill them all before they can breed anymore. Then we can go back to occupying countries for their natural resources or paying off governments in name of American democracy. King George III would be so proud.

Indeed. Just makes you wonder though - based on say the profiling thread is it actually terrorism we oppose or merely islamic extremism?

From a linguistic point of view the concept of a "war on terror" is completely ludicrous, makes me cringe everytime I hear it. War on terrorism - sure, but war on terror? How do you declare war on a vague emotion?

I mean the emperor Caligula supposedly declared war on the sea....

Are you questioning the President? You know who that aligns you with? The little baby terrorists that are being born right at this moment. This war is on YOU, brother.

Edited September 3, 2006 by Steven_and_Jinky

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Indeed. Not to mention its not clear how we are winning, or indeed what we are winning - because its equally unclear what the goal of this "war on terror" is. With Iraq not having any direct link to 9/11 and US national security threats - people already suspect that this is simply a new justification for plain, old fashioned imperialist expansion.

9/11 just gave the president carte blanche to knock over all the "ant-hills" he doesn't like, regardless of whether or not they are involved in any actual terrorism.

You weren't briefed? The object of the 'war on terror' is to rid the world of all terrorists - kill them all before they can breed anymore. Then we can go back to occupying countries for their natural resources or paying off governments in name of American democracy. King George III would be so proud.

Indeed. Just makes you wonder though - based on say the profiling thread is it actually terrorism we oppose or merely islamic extremism?

From a linguistic point of view the concept of a "war on terror" is completely ludicrous, makes me cringe everytime I hear it. War on terrorism - sure, but war on terror? How do you declare war on a vague emotion?

I mean the emperor Caligula supposedly declared war on the sea....

Are you questioning the President? You know who that aligns you with? The little baby terrorists that are being born right at this moment. This war is on YOU, brother.

Because if we're not with him, we're with the terrorists.

So much for the "cool-headed decision maker"