New Policy for Suspensions: For Excessive Issues

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Are there people who actually get that many suspensions?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Are there people who actually get that many suspensions?

If you look at the two posts prior to yours, it seems there is at least one.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

Several.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Can you extend that to warnings as well? For example, by default, a member should be warned in a PM before getting a suspension, however, if they are repeatedly violating the same TOS within a certain time frame (like with suspensions), then they automatically are suspended without warning.

I only know from what some here have shared with me outside of this forum, but it seems to be that members are getting quick suspensions for what amounts to very minor violations and without warning. Right now, it is all too easy for someone who has a personal ax to grind, to hit the report button on the most petty of issues. In the OT and P&R, there has long been a steady flow of online banter and bickering. There's a lot of instigating going on that leads to TOS violations and it seems that the instigator isn't getting equal punishment. It's like in hockey, when there's a fight that breaks out, it's not just the two fighting, but the instigator who also goes to the penalty box. It's understandable that it gets difficult to effectively monitor what actually has transpired, which is why it should matter as to who is hitting the report button, as they are most often an active participant. So perhaps a potential suspension to those who repeatedly hit the report button over the pettiest of issues and when they seem to consistently target a certain member?

Edited February 15, 2011 by 8TBVBN

[Ban Hammer 13,333]

For example, by default, a member should be warned in a PM before getting a suspension,

by default? where did you come up with that?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

by default? where did you come up with that?

Say what? I'm expressing my opinion - that by default, a member should be given a warning prior to a suspension, except when they repeatedly violate the same TOS within a certain time frame.

Edited February 15, 2011 by 8TBVBN

[tmma 467]

in OT and PR people who express their opinion to the masses should prepare by growing. a. thicker.skin.

The upper forums...totally diff matter.

IMO ( of course I say that jic someone takes offense at my opinion ).

[Ban Hammer 13,333]

Say what? I'm expressing my opinion - that by default, a member should be given a warning prior to a suspension, except when they repeatedly violate the same TOS within a certain time frame.

except for that's not how it's worded in the tos, nor in ewok's post. so how did you come up with "by default"?

A person may receive a one or more day suspension if:

Again, a person personally attacks another member by using profane language, verbal threats, or other forms of derogatory comments directly at a specific member. This is referring to blatantly derogatory and antagonizing threats, not one made in jest. In this case judgment may be necessary including looking at if this is a trend or just a single event that will likely not occur again.

Or

If a person repeatedly disregards requests by a moderator to curb certain behavior that is destructive to the community.

link

[^_^ 5,021]

this is too funny.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

in OT and PR people who express their opinion to the masses should prepare by growing. a. thicker.skin.

The upper forums...totally diff matter.

IMO ( of course I say that jic someone takes offense at my opinion ).

Well said.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Sorry, another question. Was there some sort of major issue that occurred recently that this is in response too? I'm noticing that P&R/OT has been much much quieter in the last 24 hrs as if there was some sort of mass suspension.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

No mass suspension.

[웃 910]

No mass suspension.

Will I get suspended if I keep posting bugs in the 'Post Bugs Here' thread?

[Kathryn41 3,205]

Can you extend that to warnings as well? For example, by default, a member should be warned in a PM before getting a suspension, however, if they are repeatedly violating the same TOS within a certain time frame (like with suspensions), then they automatically are suspended without warning.

By the time it gets this serious you can rest assured that the individuals involved are well aware of their indiscretions and have been warned many, many times by all members of the moderation team, not just one in particular. They have had a number of suspensions - often increasingly longer ones - and have refused to modify their posting behaviour in spite of warnings and suspensions. This is very much a last chance option prior to a complete suspension of their account. This is for serious, habitual abuse, whether instigating or in response.

[luckytxn 2,264]

Sorry, another question. Was there some sort of major issue that occurred recently that this is in response too? I'm noticing that P&R/OT has been much much quieter in the last 24 hrs as if there was some sort of mass suspension.

I have been very busy lately and sleeping weird times and stuff. Promise to try soon to come back more often and get things back to normal.