What was Global Warming is now....

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Yep, them NASA scientists really pulled a fast one on us all....haha, oh boy. Good thing, guys with an elementary understanding of science such as yourself are on to their shenanigans like flies on sh!t.

That a boy! Keep that attitude up! Cling to your fallen theories until the bitter end. Tell me again, why did they change the name of this theory from Global Warming to Climate Disruption? Oh wait, I know. It is because the warming stopped! Now everything from drought to flood, heat wave to arctic blast, bad hurricanes seasons to quiet seasons to your bad case of gas is all because of GW?

The jokes on you pal!

[Dakine10 5,452]

That a boy! Keep that attitude up! Cling to your fallen theories until the bitter end. Tell me again, why did they change the name of this theory from Global Warming to Climate Disruption? Oh wait, I know. It is because the warming stopped! Now everything from drought to flood, heat wave to arctic blast, bad hurricanes seasons to quiet seasons to your bad case of gas is all because of GW?

The jokes on you pal!

So when exactly did the warming stop? 2010 was the warmest year on record (tied wtih 2005) since record keeping began in 1880.

Are you trying to say that global temperature is dropping based on a cold and snowy January?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

So when exactly did the warming stop? 2010 was the warmest year on record (tied wtih 2005) since record keeping began in 1880.

Are you trying to say that global temperature is dropping based on a cold and snowy January?

Here is what I am saying. The GW hoaxers have been selling this "crisis" stuff for a couple decades. Nothing changes.

Now the Republicans are going to cut off funding for more studies and deep six any environmental laws, taxes etc. It will all be put on hold for a few years. Maybe 10-12 years. Whether you think that is stupid or not, does not matter. It IS going to happen.

So in 10-12 years is it still going to be a crisis? Who will be listening then?

[JohnSmith2007 353]

So when exactly did the warming stop? 2010 was the warmest year on record (tied wtih 2005) since record keeping began in 1880.

Are you trying to say that global temperature is dropping based on a cold and snowy January?

I am saying the warming stopped. You just admitted it. This year tied with 2005 which is almost the same as 1998. If we are having GW then each year should be warmer than the last. Yet since 1998 there has been no warming at all. At worst you can say we are having global tempurature stasis. But you can't call it that because it isn't scary sounding enough.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I am saying the warming stopped. You just admitted it. This year tied with 2005 which is almost the same as 1998. If we are having GW then each year should be warmer than the last. Yet since 1998 there has been no warming at all. At worst you can say we are having global tempurature stasis. But you can't call it that because it isn't scary sounding enough.

I like this graph:

[JohnSmith2007 353]

I like this graph:

You know, I am not really smart and all that but it looks like the temp from 1989 and last year are about the same! Yeah, a whole lot of warming going on there!

And the spread from 1880 to today is just short of 1 deg. Wow! It sure is getting hot!!!!!

Edited February 4, 2011 by JohnSmith2007

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

You know, I am not really smart and all that but it looks like the temp from 1989 and last year are about the same! Yeah, a whole lot of warming going on there!

If you use the stretch function, you can make any data plot look ominous.

[Ban Hammer 13,481]

And the spread from 1880 to today is just short of 1 deg. Wow! It sure is getting hot!!!!!

correct. ominous, eh?

Edited February 4, 2011 by charles!

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I like this graph:

Looks kinda like a hockey stick. Kinda. Like. Actually it doesn't look like a hockey stick at all.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

And the spread from 1880 to today is just short of 1 deg. Wow! It sure is getting hot!!!!!

correct. ominous, eh?

Yeah, it makes me want the government to raise my taxes to fix it!!!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

What a bunch of smart guys we've got right here. Ha! Them dirty, good-for-nothing scientists trying to trick ordinary joe's with their fancy charts and data. You fellas ought to start your own science. Call it Joe Science.

Edited February 4, 2011 by 8TBVBN

[Peikko 1,575]

I have to ask, how exactly do you think science research projects work? If I am supposed to accept that there is a huge hoax going on I also have to believe that climate scientists world wide are deliberately manipulating data and apparently the reason why they are doing this is to obtain more funding to perpetuate the hoax. Now, I know that the idea of man being able to influence the global climate is a bit of a difficult concept for some people to grasp, but surely the idea that climate scientists abandoned all pretense at doing any real research more than 20 years ago simply in order to line their own pockets (because money is really what makes a scientist tick) and that this has been happening in every country in the world requires a huge leap into irrationality. I know which makes more sense to me.

Edited February 4, 2011 by Madame Cleo

[tmma 467]

What a bunch of smart guys we've got right here. Ha! Them dirty, good-for-nothing scientists trying to trick ordinary joe's with their fancy charts and data. You fellas ought to start your own science. Call it Joe Science.

grrrrr.....I had a bet that your next post on this thread would contain the word ' consensus' and the phrase ' body of scientists'. Grrrrr.

Edited February 4, 2011 by tmma

[one...two...tree 2,762]

grrrrr.....I had a bet that your next post on this thread would contain the word ' consensus' and the phrase ' body of scientists'. Grrrrr.

[Ban Hammer 13,481]

Looks kinda like a hockey stick. Kinda. Like. Actually it doesn't look like a hockey stick at all.

we oughta make them canadians play hockey with hockey sticks shaped like that.