Jump to content
David and Marina

Over 140 days & Congressional Inquiry/Media

 Share

20 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: France
Timeline
but the signatures of people who have not been waiting 6 months will do nothing. you could start a "we've been waiting 3 months petition" ?

Not even vaguely true. It's simple accountability and proper management we want...and that has to do with ALL of us...old and new filers alike. So all voices will matter equally. If it's a congressional inquiry we want, the only thing that matters is that American citizens are concerned and want answers. Believe me, as someone who's done a little unofficial lobbying for various causes, that's all it takes is a mass of people who want answers to effect the necessary pressure.

January 2004: Met Laurent at the Bibliothèque nationale in Paris

February 2004: We became an actual couple

January 29th, 2006: I left France to return to the United States--AWFUL to say goodbye!

June 2006: Finally convinced Laurent that a K-1 visa would be more time-effective than trying to get an H-1

August 1st, 2006: The K-1 petition is finally in the mail and on its way to Nebraska...WooHoooo!! And yes, I remembered to attach the check! :-)

August 3rd, 2006: USPS online tracking shows that my petition (sent certified) was received at the NSC at 5:05am

August 14th, 2006: NOA1 received USPS!! (I-129F recv'd at CSC: 8/4; NOA date: 8/10; last touched: 8/11)

October 2nd, 2006: I MISTAKENLY thought we had an approval...False alarm...Back to waiting...

October 3rd, 2006: TOUCHED!!

October 4th, 2006: REALLY AND TRULY APPROVED!!! Email notification lists 10/3 as the NOA2 date.

Later that same day: TOUCHED...AGAIN! Hope that means I'm in a cozy box and moving to NVC this week...

October 10th, 2006: Received official NOA2 via snail mail.

October 19th, 2006: Case received at NVC!! AWESOME!!

October 20th, 2006: Case forwarded to Paris!! DHL says two shipments were headed that way. Must be in there somewhere...

October 27th, 2006: Received official receipt letter from NVC via USPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Japan
Timeline

I have to agree with that. I too would be a little weary about signing or putting a receipt number. Those who have should remove it. In my opinion people dealing with these cases can be very judgemental and if you label yourself with your number then who knows what trouble they could try to stir up for you. Also good point about whether they are going to look at every name and compare it to names of those that have applied for visas. I dont think they have the time for it. There really isnt anyway to avoid the waiting process and I doubt they will consider cutting corners in order to push cases through faster since security is the top issue these days for them. Every case is different in reference to country and situation.

ARR.jpgaug06ayeshaB.jpg

Meeting Online: Yahoo chartroom Aug 2001.

Direct meeting & marriage: Dec 2003 USA, NY

I-130 petition in DCFR Tokyo: March 14th 2004. Case reffered to DHS USCIS

Four visits to japan in 2004: Oct 2004, wife got pragnant.

Wife/Fiance left USA and moved into Japan: Feb 5th 2005.

Baby Born: June 24th 2005(Japan)

I-130 denied: July 17 2005(Divorce was declared not valid)

Refiling Divorce: oJuly 17th 2005 NY State.

Divorce granted: Nov 17th 2005

K-1 application: Mar 1st 2006

Approval: May 23rd 2006

US consulate RFE: June 15th 2006

FRE sent (Original passports, birth certificate, all origional docs): July 10th 2006

Medical: Oct 11th 2006.

Interview: Nov 10th 2006(expected)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
I signed but no way I am giving a case number out. there are over 50 of us over 150 days. I would expect a lot more signatures than I am seeing.

wolf

Wolf is right! Why are there only 47 signatures so far? We ALL want the same thing right? So our voices should be heard!

2-14-2006- Engaged on a snowy night in Kiev

2-19-2006- Filed I129F

2-23-2006- NOA1 generated-REJECTED- (they said no fee attached, but I sent THE SAME CHECK back)

3-13-2006- NOA1 generated, reciept date of application

6-2-2006- (Sasha's bday) Transferred to CSC

6-14-2006- Recieved at CSC

6-23-2006- RFE generated IMBRA

6-30-2006-RFE recieved and returned by me.

7-8-2006-RFE recieved by CSC

7-11-2006-"touched" I just figured this out!!! ;)

8-3-2006 - Touched!

8-4-2006 - Touched again!

8-6-2006 - Touched again again!

8-25-2006 - Touched! Its been almost three weeks since the last one...forgot how that felt!

9-7-2006- Touched...but only because I called. :( So dissapointed right now....

9-8-2006- Touched...a real one...not because I called. Hope it actually means something like it did for Gary!

9-11-2006-APPROVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

9-12-2006-Touched again today...to NVC?

9-16-2006-NOA2 recieved in mail

10-4-2006-Petition sent to NVC

10-21-2006-Touched??? #######?!?

10-25-2006-Touched again??

10-27-2006-NVC case received!

10-30-2006-NVC sent case to Consulate in Kiev!!! Come come on hurry up!!!

11-30-2006-Interview...PASSED!

12-8-2006-arriving together at Portland International Airport!!!

1-25-2007-MARRIED!

3-6-2007-Filed EAD, AP, and I485

3-13-2007-NOA1's for all of the above. ONE year exactly from NOA1 of 129f. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Australia
Timeline
I have to agree with that. I too would be a little weary about signing or putting a receipt number. Those who have should remove it. In my opinion people dealing with these cases can be very judgemental and if you label yourself with your number then who knows what trouble they could try to stir up for you.

ANYONE KNOW HOW I CAN EDIT MY SIGNATURE LINE TO REMOVE CASE # ????? :help:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Why does it matter how long I have been waiting? Can't I sign in support of those people who have been waiting for longer than 6 months, wouldnt it be beneficial to have all my family and friends sign this petition to show that even though they have no stake in this they support the idea of the president keeping his word as well as the the director being held accountable???

Just asking.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...