Jump to content

23 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Portsmouth is a great little city. New Hampshire is definitely underrated. It's beautiful. It's like Vermont, but for people who like freedom.

Are you against gay marriage and civil unions? Which freedoms do people in New hampshire have that we don't?

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: Timeline
Posted

The chart you quote is a conservative report. Conservative values rank high. I am sure we get no points for marriage and civl unions...

Dude, do you even read? I even bolded this sentence for you but I'll paste it for you again. And yes, you do get points for civil unions. This report even frowns on jailing people for victimless crimes (marijuana possession, for example).

Vermont (#45 economic, #11 personal, #40 overall) must be considered one of the least free states in the Union, unless all one is interested in are guns and civil unions.
Filed: Timeline
Posted

Which freedoms do people in New hampshire have that we don't?

Since you refuse to read, here you go. Another pasted excerpt.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire is by our count the freest state in the country. Depending on weights, however, it really shares the first, second and third slots with Colorado and South Dakota. New Hampshire does much better on economic (#2) than personal freedom (#13). Taxes and spending are among the lowest in the country, but the tax regime is highly skewed. New Hampshire has the third highest property and corporate income taxes in the United States. These

should be high priorities for cutting. On the spending side, the likeliest suspect for cutting is transportation, which is higher than average once one controls for federal grants and population density (less dense states spend more on roads). Once state population is controlled for, New Hampshire is one of the most fiscally decentralized states in the country. Local governments also must raise two-thirds of what they spend with their own taxes. Gun laws are among the most liberal in the country, but the state has a weak “peaceable journey” regime (carrying a firearm in a car requires a concealed carry permit). Its alcohol regime is relatively free. Despite state control of retail distribution of wine and spirits, the effective tax rates on these products are zero, according to the Tax Foundation. Marijuana laws are middling; low-level possession could be decriminalized like Maine, while low-level cultivation could be made a misdemeanor like both Maine and Vermont. New Hampshire is the only state in the country with no seat-belt law for adults. It lacks a motorcycle helmet law but does have a bicycle helmet law and authorizes

sobriety checkpoints. New Hampshire is one of three states that permit self-insurance for auto liability. Gambling is relatively controlled: Most gaming must take place under a charitable license, social gaming is prohibited, and aggravated gambling is a felony. State approval is required to open a private school. Home school laws are about average on the whole, but the standardized testing and recordkeeping requirements are more onerous than most states.

Labor laws are generally market-friendly, but it is not a right-to-work state. Occupational licensing is worse

than average. Both eminent domain and asset forfeiture have been thoroughly reformed. The state’s liability

system is one of the best, but campaign finance regulations are quite strict. As of 2006, smoking bans allowed many exemptions, but a thoroughgoing ban has since passed (not captured by our index).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Since you refuse to read, here you go. Another pasted excerpt.

Actually I prefer to be briefed rather than read the reports. Thanks. I'll let you know if I need anything else.

So I see that Vermont is number 11 in personal freedom to New Hampshire's number 13. OK I am down with that. New Hampshire has crazy strict gun laws! You need a permit for a gun in the car? #######! Plus they do not let us carry guns there but we let them carry here. No fair.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Since you refuse to read, here you go. Another pasted excerpt.

Actually I prefer to be briefed rather than read the reports. Thanks. I'll let you know if I need anything else.

A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read.

-Mark Twain

Filed: Timeline
Posted

So I see that Vermont is number 11 in personal freedom to New Hampshire's number 13.

Wow, you read!

New Hampshire has crazy strict gun laws! You need a permit for a gun in the car? #######! Plus they do not let us carry guns there but we let them carry here.

I guess the author had Vermonters like you in mind when they wrote this:

Vermont (#45 economic, #11 personal, #40 overall) must be considered one of the least free states in the Union, unless all one is interested in are guns and civil unions.

I suppose when guns and civil unions are all you have, it's understandable that's all you're interested in.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

It's interesting to read that Texas has a small state government, but it's not that surprising. I can't recall too many complaints from natives about the size. The state agencies with which I've dealt seem to be remarkably efficient (although there sure could be more Driver's License offices, si man). Twice, both on Mondays, I filed forms by mail with the Nonprofit division of the State Corporations Section, and I received the executed forms back in the mail on (first time) Friday and (second time) Thursday. Granted that they were rather simple forms, but someone was on the ball and didn't sit on them, when they surely could have.

Texas state agencies seem to have outstanding websites, which makes conducting business extremely easy and even a pleasure. I wonder whether concentrated effort was put into these in order to avoid expanding the size of the state government.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Texas

Texas (#7 economic, #5 personal, #5 overall) has one of the smallest state governments in the country. Nevertheless, as one of us who lives in Texas can testify, there are plenty of areas where improvement is needed. As a percentage of corrected GSP, Texas has the second lowest tax burden in the country and the third lowest grants-adjusted government spending. However, government employment is a standard deviation higher than the national average.

Gun control is better than average, but the state falls short on open-carry laws, stricter-than-federal minimum age for purchase rules, and dealer licensing. Alcohol is less regulated than in most other states, and taxes are low. Low-level marijuana cultivation is a misdemeanor, but otherwise marijuana laws are very harsh. Texas does not authorize sobriety checkpoints. Private and home schools are almost completely unregulated. Labor laws are generally

good, except for a prevailing wage law. Texas is the only state not to require employers to contribute to workers’ compensation coverage. While Texas has only light community rating, it has imposed mandated coverages on health insurance increasing the cost of premiums by more than 63%.45 Texas is one of the leaders in telecom and cable “deregulation.” Unfortunately, eminent domain has not been extensively reformed. The state’s liability system is much

worse than average; ending the election of judges may help here. There are no smoking bans on private property.

On the bolded items:

Our 'availability' of alcohol might be more lax than in other states, but don't be fooled on regualation. The TABC is one of tbe biggest and most powerful agencies in the state and they take their job VERY seriously. Not to mention our liquor taxes are actually quite high.

On 'Sobriety Checkpoints,' that's actually being taken up in this legislative session. Texas has come down hard on this side of drunk driving in recent years (major cities mostly) and it gets more harsh. They've been setting up checkpoints during holiday weekends and even getting COURT ORDERED blood tests on the spot at some of these checkpoints. It's disgusting to be honest. The government should have NO RIGHT to your blood if all you are doing is driving down the road... "probable cause" goes a bit too far here and they want to make them 'legal' statewide now too.

On 'workers compensation' insurance... The state doesn't require the state-verion of it, however every employer who does not carry it, has to make it very visible to their employees that they don't carry it and they also need to have some sort of other 'insurance/policy' in place to cover any on-the-job intances. I deal with this all the time in the company I work for.

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...